Pulsed Field Ablation vs Anti-Arrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation

(AVANT GUARD Trial)

Not currently recruiting at 77 trial locations
BS
Overseen ByBoston Scientific
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Boston Scientific Corporation
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial examines the effectiveness of two treatments for individuals with persistent atrial fibrillation, a type of irregular heartbeat. The goal is to determine whether pulsed field ablation, a new heart procedure, is safer and more effective than anti-arrhythmic drugs, which help control heart rhythm. It suits individuals who have experienced symptoms from persistent atrial fibrillation for more than a week but less than a year and have not recently used these heart medications. Participants must be willing to have a small heart monitor device placed under their skin for the study. As an unphased trial, this study provides a unique opportunity to contribute to groundbreaking research that could enhance future treatment options.

Do I have to stop taking my current medications for the trial?

The trial does not specify if you must stop taking your current medications, but it does exclude those who have been treated with certain anti-arrhythmic drugs within 6 months before enrollment. It's best to discuss your specific medications with the trial team.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research has shown that pulsed field ablation (PFA) is generally safe for treating atrial fibrillation, a type of irregular heartbeat. In one study with 339 patients, the procedure succeeded in almost all cases, with very few safety issues. Another study with 637 patients found a low rate of safety events, just 2%, indicating that serious problems are rare. Additionally, no major safety issues were reported within a week of the procedure in another group of patients.

Anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) are already used to treat irregular heartbeats like atrial fibrillation. Since these drugs are approved for this purpose, their safety is well understood. However, side effects can occur and vary depending on the specific drug.

Overall, both PFA and AAD treatments are generally well-tolerated by people with atrial fibrillation.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) for treating persistent atrial fibrillation because it offers a novel approach compared to traditional anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs). Unlike AADs, which work by altering the electrical signals in the heart, PFA uses electrical fields to precisely target and eliminate problematic heart tissue without damaging surrounding areas. This technique could potentially reduce side effects and improve outcomes for patients. Additionally, PFA's precision and minimally invasive nature could lead to quicker recovery times and more effective management of atrial fibrillation.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for persistent atrial fibrillation?

Research has shown that pulsed field ablation (PFA), one of the treatments studied in this trial, holds promise for treating ongoing atrial fibrillation (AF), a type of irregular heartbeat. One study found PFA effective for 63.5% of patients after one year, with nearly two-thirds experiencing significant benefits. Another study demonstrated that PFA reduced irregular heartbeats by 94%, greatly lessening symptoms for patients. These results suggest that PFA could be a strong first choice for treating persistent AF. Participants in this trial may receive either PFA or an Anti-Arrhythmic Drug (AAD) as their initial treatment.12346

Who Is on the Research Team?

OW

Oussama Wazni, M.D.

Principal Investigator

The Cleveland Clinic

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

Inclusion Criteria

Your doctor has confirmed that you have had continuous atrial fibrillation for more than 7 days, but no longer than 365 days.
You are able to understand and agree to participate in the study.
You are able to complete all required tests at an approved medical center.
See 2 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Randomization and Initial Treatment

Subjects are randomized to either Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) or Anti-Arrhythmic Drug (AAD) therapy as initial treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation.

12 months
Multiple visits as per local clinical practice

Blinding Period

Monitoring and adjustment of AAD dosage or PFA procedure to assess initial treatment efficacy.

Up to 12 months

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, including assessment of atrial fibrillation burden and treatment success.

12 months

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Flecainide, Sotalol, Propafenone, Dofetilide, Dronedarone
  • Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA)
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Anti-Arrhythmic Drug (AAD)Active Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Boston Scientific Corporation

Lead Sponsor

Trials
758
Recruited
867,000+
Michael F. Mahoney profile image

Michael F. Mahoney

Boston Scientific Corporation

Chief Executive Officer since 2016

MBA from Wake Forest University, BBA in Finance from the University of Iowa

Kenneth Stein profile image

Kenneth Stein

Boston Scientific Corporation

Chief Medical Officer since 2020

MD from Harvard Medical School, MMSc in Clinical Investigation from Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology

Citations

Pulsed Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial FibrillationPrimary effectiveness was 63.5% (57.3% lower confidence limit) at 1 year, with 8.5% patients having a single, isolated atrial fibrillation ...
Pulsed Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial FibrillationPrimary effectiveness was 63.5% (57.3% lower confidence limit) at 1 year, with 8.5% patients having a single, isolated atrial fibrillation ...
Pulsed Field Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation With ...Freedom from recurrent atrial flutter was 97.2%. Detailed analysis of the full insertable cardiac monitor data revealed freedom from AA of ≥30 ...
One-year outcomes of a conformable single-shot pulsed ...Following the ablation procedure, these patients experienced a 94% reduction in daily AA burden, with a postablation burden of 1.6 ± 1.8%, ...
5.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39243306/
Safety, efficacy, and quality of life outcomes of pulsed field ...Conclusions: Similar to outcomes in the global cohort, ablation with the PulseSelect™ PFA catheter was efficient, effective, and safe in a Japanese population, ...
Considerations regarding safety with pulsed field ablation ...PFA represents a promising ablation modality for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, with overall favorable safety outcomes observed in initial human studies.
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security