The Effect of Immediate Versus Delayed Debriefing on Basic Life Support Competence In Undergraduate Nursing Students.
Palo Alto (17 mi)Overseen byFahad Alanezi, PhD Candidate, MSc, BSN
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Travel: May be covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: N/A
Waitlist Available
Sponsor: University of Cincinnati
No Placebo Group
Trial Summary
What is the purpose of this trial?The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if immediate (hot) or delayed (cold) debriefing is better for undergraduate nursing students during Basic Life Support (BLS) training.
The study aims to:
* Identify the effect of hot versus cold debriefing in BLS training for nursing students.
* Identify which debriefing method students prefer.
Researchers will compare the two debriefing methods. Participants will:
* Be randomly assigned (by flipping a coin) to either hot or cold debriefing.
* Take part in a simulation about Basic Life Support.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
* Junior or senior nursing students (i.e., in their third or fourth year of the BSN degree).
Treatment Details
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Hot DebriefingExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
The control group received a hot debriefing (immediately after the simulation).
Group II: Cold DebriefingExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
The researcher assigned a cold debriefing (after one-day post-simulation) for undergraduate nursing students in the intervention group.
Find a clinic near you
Research locations nearbySelect from list below to view details:
University Of Cincinnati College of NursingCincinnati, OH
Loading ...
Who is running the clinical trial?
University of CincinnatiLead Sponsor