Condition
Location

42 Hyperthermia Trials

Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Hyperthermia patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.

Undergoing cancer treatment comes with various risks and side effects. This clinical trial aims to reduce those risks and side effects through continuous monitoring of vital signs and blood levels. The goal is to see if potential side effects can be identified and treated sooner. During this study, participants will wear an Alio Smartpatch™. The Alio Smartpatch™ is a wireless remote monitoring system. This device will measure participants' vital signs and blood levels. Participants will also be asked to use continuous glucose monitors to measure their glucose levels. The data collected on each participant from these devices will be remotely monitored at all times by clinical staff at a company known as Quantify Remote Care. If a participant's results look like they are experiencing a side effect, the participant will be contacted immediately by Quantify Remote Care team. The Quantify Remote Care team will function as an extension of the participant's cancer clinical team and will relay any significant issues back to them. Quantify Health also provides dietary and mental health support as needed for all participants.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 65
Sex:All
30 Participants Needed
This trial studies whole-body hyperthermia (WBH), a treatment using controlled heat exposure, to help improve mood and reduce anxiety. It focuses on women with postpartum depression (PPD) who prefer non-medication treatments. WBH works by affecting the immune system and brain function.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 50
Sex:All
240 Participants Needed
The goal of this interventional clinical study is to investigate the use of mild therapeutic hypothermia devices for preservation of sensory structures in the cochlea after noise exposure. The main aims of the study are: 1. To test the safety and best duration for use for a new hypothermia device. 2. To determine if the hypothermia device helps decrease noise-induced hearing loss in a group of firefighters. Participants will wear the mild therapeutic hypothermia therapy devices immediately after a fire service shift serially over a year. Researchers will compare results from those receiving the therapy to those from a control group (individuals receiving no therapy and a sham therapy).
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 55
Sex:All
116 Participants Needed
Radiation therapy to the head and neck region is known to cause taste dysfunction. Preliminary studies showed that cooling normal structures may lower damage caused by radiation. The purpose of this research study is to see if it is feasible to use an intraoral cooling device during radiation treatments to preserve or lower the decline of taste function.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Early Phase 1
Age:18+
Sex:All
15 Participants Needed
As overheating in buildings is expected to increase as global warming continues, proactive measures to increase heat resiliency in heat-vulnerable older people are needed, especially for those without access to home cooling or reliable sources of electricity. While short-term heat acclimation through exercise in the heat has been shown to increase heat dissipation and decrease both the physical and mental stress imposed on individuals exposed to heat, such protocols are not tenable for older, sedentary adults. A recent report showed that seven consecutive days of warm-water immersion improved whole-body heat loss and reduced physiological strain as assessed during an exercise-heat stress in habitually active older men This represents a critical finding as an increase heat-loss capacity would serve as an important safeguard for older adults exposed to indoor overheating due to lack of air-conditioning. While this preliminary data highlights passive hot water immersion as a promising strategy for increasing heat-resilience in vulnerable adults, work is needed to confirm its efficacy in more "real-world" environments. Thus, this study aims to assess the effectiveness of a 7-day passive heating (warm-water immersion with core temperature clamped at \~38.5°C for the final 60 minutes) protocol in mitigating increases in thermal and cardiovascular strain in older females exposed to daylong (10-hours) indoor overheating (36°C, 45% relative humidity) prior to and following the passive heating intervention. Relative to males, females have a reduced heat loss capacity (\~5%), which is driven by differences in the activation of heat loss responses (i.e., skin blood flow and sweating). Although there have been mixed findings with regards to the influence of sex as a mediating factor for heat-related mortality, some studies suggest that females are at a higher risk of heat-related mortality and morbidity compared to males, especially amongst older individuals (≥65 years). Notably, a greater proportion of older females died compared to their male counterparts during the 2021 Western Heat Dome. While the underlying causes for these differences remain unclear, greater cardiovascular strain may place females at higher mortality risk during extreme heat.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:65 - 85
Sex:Female
12 Participants Needed
The overall goal of this project is to identify a work/rest cycle that allows for faster mission completion needed in emergency situations, compared to current Army heat guidance, while mitigating heat strain and neuromuscular fatigue. This project will determine the trade-off between faster mission completion and risk of heat strain and physical performance decrements. Completion of this project will allow military leaders to make informed decisions by understanding the impact of their choices on the magnitude of physical performance decrements and expected heat casualties, setting up hot weather missions for success.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 39
Sex:All
24 Participants Needed
This study is being done to see if the investigators can improve the outcome of patients with biliary tract cancer that do not qualify for surgery. This study will compare the effects, good and/or bad, of using a combination of standard of care chemoimmunotherapy, with the addition of radiation and deep hyperthermia. In this study, participants will be receiving standard of care chemoimmunotherapy (gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab), radiation (spatially fractionated radiation therapy), and deep hyperthermia. Chemoimmunotherapy Chemoimmunotherapy is when chemotherapy drugs are combined with immunotherapy drugs. Chemotherapy uses different drugs to kill or slow the growth of cancer cells, whereas immunotherapy drugs are used to help the immune system attack cancer cells. For this study, the drugs Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Durvalumab will be used. Chemoimmunotherapy will be delivered over 4 cycles for this study and can continue longer if the treating physician decides this is appropriate. Each cycle will last 3 weeks. Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) SFRT is a form of radiation therapy that gives a single large dose of radiation to large tumors or tumors that do not qualify for surgery. This is not a standard type of treatment for people with this diagnosis. For this study, participants will be receiving radiation once on day 1 of the second chemoimmunotherapy cycle. Deep Hyperthermia (HT) Hyperthermia is used in combination with chemoimmunotherapy and radiation treatment in this study. Hyperthermia has the potential to make both chemotherapy and radiation treatments more effective. For this study, participants will receive HT three times: on the first day of cycles 2, 3, and 4 of chemoimmunotherapy.
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 1
Age:21+
Sex:All
15 Participants Needed
A recent report showed that maintaining indoor temperature at or below 26°C safeguards older, heat vulnerable adults against potentially dangerous increases in thermal and cardiovascular strain during an extreme heat event (PMID: 38329752). However, this proposed limit does not consider the potential cumulative effect of successive days of heat exposure, which could lead to a progressive deterioration in thermoregulatory and cardiovascular function and necessitate adjustments to upper indoor temperature limits. Further, thermal comfort and quality of sleep may be negatively impacted when bedroom temperatures exceed 24°C (PMID: 3090680). On this basis, some health agencies have recommended that bedroom temperatures at night should not exceed 26°C unless ceiling fans are available (PMID: 3090680). Currently, however, it is unknown whether indoor overheating impairs sleep quality and physiological strain on a subsequent day in older adults and, if so, whether maintaining indoor temperature at 26°C is sufficient to prevent these adverse health impacts. With rising global temperatures and more extreme heat events, energy management strategies to limit the strain on the power grid during the daytime are now increasingly commonplace. Thus, understanding the benefits of maintaining indoor temperature at the recommend upper limits of 26°C during the nighttime only on surrogate physiological indicators of health is an important step in understanding how to optimize protection for heat-vulnerable older adults when power outages occur. The investigators will assess the efficacy of proposed indoor temperature limits (i.e., 26°C) in mitigating increases in core temperature and cardiovascular strain over three consecutive days (3 days, 2 nights) in older adults (60-85 years) with (indoor temperatures maintained at the recommend 26°C at all times throughout the three days) and without (daytime temperature fixed at 34°C (temperature experienced in homes without air-conditioning during an extreme heat event) with nighttime temperature at 26°C) access to daytime cooling. By quantifying the effect of daylong indoor overheating on surrogate physiological outcomes linked with heat-related mortality and morbidity in older adults, the investigators can determine if refinements in the recommended upper temperature threshold is required, including best practices when power outages may occur during an extreme heat event.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:65 - 85
Sex:All
12 Participants Needed
The purpose of this study is to compare surface and intradermal skin temperature responses to heat stress with and without evaporative and convective cooling.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 65
Sex:All
20 Participants Needed
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two temperature management systems, the warmUP (WU-20) and the Bair Hugger®, in preventing perioperative hypothermia during surgeries. The study aims to determine whether the warmUP system is as effective as the Bair Hugger® in maintaining core body temperature. The main questions this trial aims to answer are: Does the warmUP system maintain intraoperative body temperatures as effectively as the Bair Hugger® during abdominal surgeries? Does the warmUP system offer additional benefits, such as reduced bacterial dispersion compared to the Bair Hugger®? Participants will: Use either the warmUP or Bair Hugger® system during surgery Undergo abdominal surgeries lasting approximately 2.5 hours Have their core temperatures monitored to assess the effectiveness of the warming device The study will evaluate whether the warmUP system provides equivalent temperature management with a smaller body surface area exposed, potentially offering advantages in surgical infection control.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 80
Sex:All
26 Participants Needed
Occupational heat stress directly threatens workers' ability to live healthy and productive lives. Heat exposed workers are at an elevated risk of experiencing impaired work performance and cognitive function leading to a greater risk of work-related injuries which includes traumatic injury and a myriad of pathophysiological conditions (e.g., heat stroke, acute kidney injury, adverse cardiovascular events). To mitigate the adverse health effects of occupational heat stress, safety organizations recommend upper limits for heat stress, typically defined by a worker's metabolic rate and the prevailing wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT). In instances where the heat load created by the combination of work intensity, environment, and clothing worn exceed the upper heat stress limits (uncompensable heat stress), controls such as rest breaks are prescribed to limit increases in core temperature beyond recommended limits. While workers are encouraged to find shelter from the heat during a rest break, it is not always possible or feasible. Typically, workers may rest while remaining exposed to the heat, recover in a shaded area or rest in an air-conditioned room or vehicle. However, the effectiveness of these cooling strategies in mitigating the level of physiological strain experienced by the worker during prolonged work in a hot environment remains unclear. In this project, the investigators will assess the efficacy of the different cooling strategies in preventing excursions in core temperature beyond recommended limits (38.0°C) following the initial stay time for moderate-intensity work in hot ambient conditions (WBGT of 29°C; represents hot outdoor conditions experienced by workers in summers in Ontario, Canada) in context of the prescribed American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) work-to-rest allocation for unacclimated adults. On three separate days, participants will walk on a treadmill at a fixed metabolic rate of 200 W/m2 until core temperature reaches and/or exceeds 38.0°C or until volitional fatigue. Thereafter, participants will complete an additional 180 min work bout employing the recommended ACGIH work-to-rest allocation of 1:3 (starting with a 45 min rest break followed by a 15 min work bout, with the cycle repeated three times over the 180 min work simulation bout) without (Control) or with cooling mitigation during each 15-min break consisting of either: i) partial cooling equivalent to sitting in a shaded space (WBGT 24°C; 31.7°C and 35% RH) such as under a tree with a light breeze (simulated with pedestal fan fixed at \~2 m/s) or ii) full cooling equivalent to sitting in air-conditioned space (e.g., room or vehicle) maintained at 22°C and 35% RH (equivalent WBGT of 16°C).
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 69
Sex:Male
20 Participants Needed
The goal of this interventional clinical study is to investigate the use of mild therapeutic hypothermia for preservation of residual hearing in cochlear implant surgery. The main questions the trial aims to answer are: 1. Is mild therapeutic hypothermia safe for use during cochlear implantation? 2. Is mild therapeutic hypothermia effective at preserving residual hearing after cochlear implantation? Participants will receive mild therapeutic hypothermia therapy during cochlear implant surgery. Researchers will compare results from those receiving the therapy to those from a control group (individuals receiving no therapy).
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18+
Sex:All
54 Participants Needed
The investigators are conducting this research study is to evaluate the feasibility (recruitment, compliance, safety, and acceptance) of using electroacupuncture (EA) to manage complex symptoms such as pain, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, and insomnia in patients who have undergone Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Additionally, the investigators are aiming to determine the effectiveness of EA in reducing these symptoms, and to examine how EA impacts important biomarkers, or proteins in the blood, that can be used as indicators or signs of these symptoms.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18+
Sex:All
20 Participants Needed
The goal of this prospective phase II unicentric Canadian clinical trial is to clarify the feasibility of modified early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (mEPIC) following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the clinical context of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal and appendicular neoplasms. The primary objective of this study is to confirm the feasibility of mEPIC by evaluating its completion rate compared to the one of historical standard early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) cohorts. The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety of the mEPIC protocol by monitoring adverse events arising during the protocol and to assess logistical implementation barriers for the nursing and Oncology pharmacy teams, respectively. Participants will undergo a modified schedule of EPIC (mEPIC) designed to maximize therapeutic benefit by exploiting the known pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties of fluorouracil (5-FU) while limiting the logistical issues of the standard protocol. mEPIC consists in shortening the original protocol from five to two days of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Additionally, instead of solely administering a singular 5-FU bolus per 24 hours-period, mEPIC is based on the De Gramont intravenous regimen and consists of administering one intraperitoneal bolus of 5-FU (400 mg/m2) followed by a 24 hours-intraperitoneal infusion of 5-FU (1200 mg/m2) on postoperative days 1 and 2.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Age:18+
Sex:All
25 Participants Needed
Image of trial facility.

Head Cooling for Stroke

Calgary, Alberta
This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, single-arm, non-randomized study to assess the safety and feasibility of external active conductive head cooling during endovascular thrombectomy procedures.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18+
Sex:All
40 Participants Needed
The "Genomic medicine Risk Assessment Care for Everyone" (GRACE)" intervention project will develop a scalable end-to-end solution for risk assessment and management that meets the needs of those populations living in low resource settings. The long-term goal is to increase access to and uptake of risk-informed evidence-based guidelines that will improve population health through better patient outcomes, higher quality of life, and decreased costs. The three primary aims are: Aim 1: Develop a scalable implementation framework that guides each unique clinical setting, including low resource settings, in deploying GRACE effectively for the needs of their patients and providers. Aim 2: Facilitate the potential for genomic medicine to promote population health by broadening access to and uptake of genomic risk assessment by the general population through a pragmatic implementation-effectiveness trial of GRACE. Aim 3: Reduce health disparities related to genomic medicine by allowing individual adaption of GRACE to suit their level of resources, education, and access within a pragmatic implementation-effectiveness trial. Three sets of participants will be engaged: patients (n=750), providers (n=25), and family members of "probands" (i.e., patients that have a genetic change that increases risk, n\~500). Patient participants will be asked to complete a baseline survey, enter their family health history information into MeTree (a family health history web-based platform) and complete a survey about their experience using the platform. Subsequent study procedures will depend on: 1) the results of their MeTree risk evaluation, 2) their acceptance/declination of genetic testing (for those categorized as needing testing by MeTree), and 3) the results of the test (for those accepting testing). Provider participants will be providers who are the primary care physicians treating one or more patients enrolled in the patient participant group. Providers will be notified on a patient by patient basis once the patient participant under their care has complete the risk assessment process and the risk report is available from MeTree. At study completion, provider participants will be asked to complete a survey about their demographics, practice, and experiences with the study. Blood relatives of the probands who are identified by the proband as open to engaging with the study will be contacted and offered genetic counseling and genetic testing.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18+
Sex:All
750 Participants Needed
This study will recruit 112 medically healthy adults (aged 18-65) currently experiencing depressive symptoms to be randomized to receive either a single Whole Body Hyperthermia (heat therapy) treatment or a Whole Body Hyperthermia treatment followed by a cold water plunge. Participants will complete a baseline assessment of their depressive symptoms as well as 1-week and 2-week post-treatment followup assessments.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 65
Sex:All
112 Participants Needed
The investigators propose a single-center multiple crossover randomized trial to determine the efficacy of four warming devices and five warming blankets. The investigators will measure cutaneous heat loss/ gain using thermal flux transducers in unanesthetized volunteers.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18+
Sex:All
20 Participants Needed
The hypothesis of this study is that consciously sedated patients suffering from ST-elevation myocardial infarction can be rapidly and safely cooled to a state of therapeutic hypothermia (32 to 34 degrees C) using the LRS ThermoSuit System prior to percutaneous coronary intervention.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18+
Sex:All
20 Participants Needed
The purpose of this study is to investigate thermoregulatory responses in older individuals with COPD.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:65+
Sex:All
44 Participants Needed
This trial is testing a special cooling vest designed for people with severe spinal cord injuries who struggle to stay cool in warm weather. The vest works by absorbing and evaporating body heat to prevent overheating. The goal is to improve comfort and safety for these individuals during hot conditions. Cooling vests have been studied for their effectiveness in reducing heat strain and improving thermal comfort in various populations, including athletes and construction workers.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 68
Sex:All
15 Participants Needed
This is a prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial to evaluate the safety of COVID-19 vaccination and other routine childhood vaccines given simultaneously at Visit 1, as compared to sequential vaccination of COVID-19 vaccine and other vaccines at separate visits (Visits 1 and 2).
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 4
Age:6 - 4
Sex:All
600 Participants Needed
Acute kidney injury is a significant complication for infants who experience hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, being associated with increased rates of death and prolonged hospitalization. This pilot study of theophylline administration soon after birth for the prevention of kidney injury will lay the foundation for the conduct of a larger clinical trial that seeks to identify a theophylline as a novel therapy to prevent kidney injury in thousands of at-risk infants.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 1, 2
Age:1 - 18
Sex:All
30 Participants Needed
Infections are a common complication in patients with cancer. They are a significant cause of complications and death in this population. Patients with cancer and low neutrophil counts due to chemotherapy or disease often have a fever and receive antibiotic treatment. The optimal duration of this treatment is largely unknown. Late, there have been some data suggesting the safety of early discontinuation of antibiotics, though most centers still give more prolonged antibiotic therapies in this situation. The unnecessary prolonged antibiotic use may increase infections with multi-drug-resistant bacteria, which carry a high death rate. Also, an increase in infections caused by Clostridioides difficile and an increase in fungal infections can happen. However, some are concerned that stopping antibiotics while the neutrophil count is still low will result in life-threatening infections. Our study aims to test whether shorter antibiotic treatment in these situations is as safe as more prolonged treatment, resulting in better antibiotic prescription practices in this population.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18+
Sex:All
80 Participants Needed
Avoiding warm ischemia time during vascular anastomosis of the renal allograft is important to prevent damage. The investigators are studying a cooling device that may control the temperature of the renal allograft during transplant surgery; attempting to keep temperatures at or below 5°C for at least 60 minutes. If found effective, this could eliminate warm ischemia and potentially prevent damage to transplanted kidneys.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18+
Sex:All
45 Participants Needed
Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) affects approximately 4,000 to 12,000 persons annually in the United States. Mortality from HIE has been reported up to 60%, with at least 25% of survivors left with significant neurocognitive disability. Despite this vital unmet medical need, no pharmacological adjunct or alternative therapy has proven beneficial in improving outcomes in neonatal HIE. RLS-0071 is a novel peptide being developed for the treatment of neonatal HIE. This study is designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of RLS-0071 in the treatment of newborns with moderate or severe HIE.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Age:< 10
Sex:All
42 Participants Needed
The purpose of this study is to assess how well cooling modalities work in reducing cardiovascular stress of the elderly to heat wave conditions
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:65+
Sex:All
50 Participants Needed
This trial is testing if cooling the body can help protect the brains of children who are in a coma after a heart attack. The researchers believe that keeping the body cool might help more children recover well or improve the recovery of those already doing well.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:2 - 17
Sex:All
900 Participants Needed
Management of neonatal pain and sedation often includes opioid therapy. A growing body of evidence suggests long-term harm associated with neonatal opioid exposure. Providing optimal sedation while neonates are undergoing therapeutic hypothermia (TH) may be beneficial but also presents therapeutic challenges. While there is evidence from animal models of brain injury and clinical trials in adults to support the safety and neuroprotective properties of dexmedetomidine (DMT), there are no published large clinical trials demonstrating safety and efficacy of DMT use in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) during treatment with TH. This study is innovative in proposing a Phase II, 2-arm trial providing the opportunity to evaluate the use of DMT as compared to the use of morphine for sedation and pain management for babies undergoing TH. We propose to confirm optimal DMT dosing by collecting opportunistic pharmacokinetics (PK) data and determine safety of DMT in this population. These data will inform a larger phase III efficacy trial.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Age:< 24
Sex:All
50 Participants Needed
Purpose: To examine the difference in patient's pain experience in the setting of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections with pretreatment of topical ice-therapy compared with no-ice.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18+
Sex:All
250 Participants Needed
Page 1 of 2+

Frequently Asked Questions

How much do Hyperthermia clinical trials pay?

Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.

How do Hyperthermia clinical trials work?

After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Hyperthermia trials 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length for Hyperthermia is 12 months.

How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?

Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.

What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?

The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.

Do I need to be insured to participate in a Hyperthermia medical study ?

Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.

What are the newest Hyperthermia clinical trials ?

Most recently, we added Alio Smart Patch Monitoring for Cancer Patients, Whole-Body Hyperthermia for Postpartum Depression and Therapeutic Hypothermia for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss to the Power online platform.