Condition
Location

14 Pediatric Asthma Trials

Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Pediatric Asthma patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.

Image of trial facility.

Benralizumab for Asthma

Cincinnati, Ohio
This trial tests benralizumab, an injectable medication, in children and teenagers aged 6 to 18 with severe eosinophilic asthma. The medication works by reducing specific white blood cells that cause lung inflammation, helping to control asthma symptoms. Benralizumab helps improve lung function for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with eosinophilic inflammation.
Pivotal Trial
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Age:6 - 18
Sex:All
200 Participants Needed
Image of trial facility.

Digital Marker for Asthma

Indianapolis, Indiana
Underdiagnosis and undertreatment is a major problem in childhood asthma management, especially in preschool-aged children. Current prognostic approaches using risk-score based tools have poor-to-modest accuracy, are impractical, and have limited evidence of efficacy in clinical settings and hence are not widely used in practice. The objective of the study is to determine the usability, acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of the childhood asthma passive digital marker (PDM) among pediatricians. The study will include practicing pediatricians within the IU Health Network.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18+
Sex:All
100 Participants Needed
Image of trial facility.

Magnesium for Asthma

Hamilton, Ontario
Despite optimal initial emergency department (ED) therapy, 50% of children with severe acute asthma have ongoing moderate-severe respiratory distress. Guidelines recommend intravenous magnesium (IVMg) for them, yet evidence for IVMg efficacy is scant and disparate. While early small Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) suggested hospitalization benefit, recent large observational studies found no association between IVMg and improved outcomes. IVMg therapy is resource-intensive, can cause hypotension and demands close monitoring. Previous RCTs only assessed early Mg effect at 1-2 hours, overlooked the peak effect of key co-interventions such as corticosteroids and did not use validated scores. IVMg use is variable and often delayed until ≥4 hours after ED therapy is started and after the hospitalization decision has been made. Thus, in observational studies children given IVMg are 6-10 times more likely to be hospitalized; these studies have major confounding and the true IVMg treatment effect is thus unknown. To conclusively determine if IVMg alters the exacerbation course, it must be given early, and the primary outcome measure should be the severity of respiratory distress measured at the peak effect of key co-interventions to focus on a clinically meaningful and objective effect. The Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM)-a valid, discriminative, reproducible and responsive-to-change instrument-is thus the ideal primary outcome measure. Hospitalization outcome has major confounding by indication and MD perceptions. Primary Aim: In children with acute asthma remaining in moderate-severe distress after 1 hour of initial ED therapy, is early IVMg therapy associated with a significantly greater improvement in respiratory distress, measured by PRAM, at 3 hours after starting the intervention, compared to placebo? Hypothesis: IVMg will yield significantly greater PRAM improvement of ≥1.0 point than placebo. Expected Outcomes: This trial will clarify if there is an incremental benefit of IVMg in decreasing respiratory distress in pediatric refractory acute asthma. A positive result will establish a proven standard of care for this indication, with a need for Knowledge Translation (KT) to implement routine early IVMg therapy. A negative result will lead to de-implementation of IVMg which may also lead to cost savings.
Pivotal Trial
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Age:2 - 17
Sex:All
192 Participants Needed
This is a single-center, randomized, SHAM-controlled, parallel assignment, double-masked,8-week interventional study among children aged 8-17 years (not yet 18 years old) of age with obesity and asthma. (n=60), recruited from Duke Health Center Creekstone, to test the effectiveness of inspiratory muscle rehabilitation (IMR) as an acceptable add-on intervention to reduce dyspnea (feeling short-of-breath or breathless) and to promote greater activity in children with obesity and asthma. Clinic to test the effectiveness of inspiratory muscle rehabilitation (IMR) as an acceptable add-on intervention to reduce dyspnea (feeling short-of-breath or breathless) and to promote greater activity in children with obesity
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:8 - 17
Sex:All
60 Participants Needed
This is single-center cross-sectional mechanistic study in lean and obese children with moderate-severe asthma, followed by a randomized, SHAM-controlled trial of Inspiratory Training (IT). The primary outcome is to describe the contributions of inspiratory muscle dysfunction (IMD) and Small Airway Dysfunction (SAD) to obesity-related versus non-obesity-related asthma. The study will involve training (IT) for 8 weeks at three intensity levels (SHAM, low and high). Target dose: 150 inspirations three times weekly. The population includes 6 to 17-year-old children with moderate to severe asthma and with a body mass index qualifying as normal habitus (BMI 5th to 84th CDC percentile) or obese habitus (≥95th percentile BMI and less than 170% of the 95th CDC percentile). Participants will be involved for 10 weeks. The investigators will use analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to estimate and test the difference in mean values of baseline measures between obese and non-obese cohorts. Covariates will include age, sex (male/female), race/ethnicity, baseline asthma severity (NAEPP step 2 vs ≥3), and atopy status
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:6 - 17
Sex:All
76 Participants Needed
This is a randomized, open-label, 3-armed feasibility trial will examine conventional oxygen therapy (COT) vs high flow nasal cannula at 4L/min flow vs HFNC at 2L/kg/min flow (max 60L/min) in moderate to severe pediatric asthma exacerbations.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:2 - 17
Sex:All
27 Participants Needed
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the implementation of the WE CARE social determinants of health (SDOH) screening and referral intervention with an antiracist lens in primary care settings can lead to a meaningful decrease in chronic disease by monitoring conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, depression, hyperlipidemia, and asthma through clinical measures. The main question it aims to answer is: Does the WE CARE SDOH screening and referral intervention applying an antiracism lens informed implementation strategies have the potential to reduce racial/ethnic health inequities in chronic diseases for minoritized patients?
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:All
Sex:All
68000 Participants Needed
The purpose of this study is to adapt and deliver an evidence-based multi-level intervention to reduce asthma disparities, and that promote and improve population health in the high-burden communities of San Juan, Puerto Rico. The Puerto Rico-Asthma Integrated Response Program (PR-AIR) will be implemented and evaluated to address pediatric asthma disparities in San Juan, PR, an area of high asthma burden. This study unfolds in two phases: In Phase 1, the researchers will collaborate with community stakeholders to identify needs, barriers and facilitators of PR-AIR implementation. Phase 2 consists of an evaluation of low-intensity (virtual) and high-intensity (in-person) methods of PR-AIR implementation outcomes using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework and a mixed methods approach.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:2 - 12
Sex:All
480 Participants Needed
The goal of this research study is to test how good an app is in making asthma easier to manage for 372 adolescents/young adults. The app is a mobile version of the asthma action plan.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:12 - 20
Sex:All
370 Participants Needed
The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of CHAMPION ("Comparative-effectiveness of a Healthy lifestyle and Asthma Management Program, In-person vs ONline"), a primary care-based intervention to address childhood obesity and asthma, and test the effectiveness of a telehealth-only version of the program. Intensive Health Behavior and Lifestyle Treatment (IHBLT), when delivered via telehealth vs. in-person among children with overweight or obesity and persistent asthma.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:6 - 17
Sex:All
500 Participants Needed
Image of trial facility.

Azithromycin for Critical Asthma

Saint Petersburg, Florida
The CR-AZI Study will assess the immunomodulatory effects of Azithromycin for pediatric Critical Asthma.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2, 3
Age:3 - 17
Sex:All
100 Participants Needed
The goal of this clinical trial is to study if starting bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP), a mask that gives pressure to the lungs, works well for children in the emergency department with moderate to severe asthma attacks. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Whether initiation of BiPAP at the same time as continuous beta-agonist therapy (e.g., nebulized albuterol) will decrease how long children with moderate to severe asthma attacks need to receive continuous beta-agonist therapy. 2. Whether early BiPAP changes how the lungs function in children with asthma attacks. 3. Whether children receiving early BiPAP experience more issues or side effects than those children who do not. All children will receive the usual treatment for asthma attacks; if they are still experiencing moderate to severe symptoms after the initial treatment, they will be asked to participate in the study. Participants will then wear a mask while they are receiving the continuous beta-agonist therapy. Some patients will receive BiPAP where pressure is given to the lungs and others will have a sham BiPAP mask where no pressure is given to the lungs. Study participants will wear the mask for 4 hours or until their treatment team feels they are ready to come off of the continuous beta-agonist therapy. Participants will receive more medications and decisions on going home or being admitted to the hospital will be decided as usual by their treatment team. Researchers will compare BiPAP versus Control (Sham BiPAP) groups to see if there is a difference in how long continuous beta-agonist therapy is needed, how the lungs are functioning, and number or type of side effects.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:5 - 17
Sex:All
126 Participants Needed
Image of trial facility.

AeviceMD for Pediatric Asthma

Los Angeles, California
A wearable remote patient monitor (AeviceMD) is to be used to monitor the respiratory health of pediatric asthma patients in this pilot study. Patients prescribed with AeviceMD should be able to gain better control over their disease during home management. Physicians should be able to optimize treatment for these patients using objective data collected from and of these patients outside of the clinic. The AeviceMD should also be used as a remote auscultation device for teleconsultations.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:3 - 18
Sex:All
20 Participants Needed
Pediatric participants with exacerbation-prone asthma will receive an intramuscular injection of triamcinolone acetonide and will be followed for 48 weeks. The study visit 2 weeks after the injection will assess the response to the study medication, while the remaining study visits will examine the temporal stability of the symptom clusters.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Age:6 - 21
Sex:All
173 Participants Needed
Page 1 of 1+

Frequently Asked Questions

How much do Pediatric Asthma clinical trials pay?

Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.

How do Pediatric Asthma clinical trials work?

After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Pediatric Asthma trials 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length for Pediatric Asthma is 12 months.

How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?

Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.

What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?

The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.

Do I need to be insured to participate in a Pediatric Asthma medical study ?

Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.

What are the newest Pediatric Asthma clinical trials ?

Most recently, we added Magnesium for Asthma, WE CARE SDOH System for Chronic Disease and High Flow Nasal Cannula for Childhood Asthma to the Power online platform.