~9 spots leftby Apr 2026

Iobenguane (131-I) + Vorinostat for Neuroblastoma

(OPTIMUM Trial)

Recruiting at 20 trial locations
NL
SB
JR
MS
YC
MS
MD
SB
MD
SB
Overseen BySuzanne Bissonnette
Age: Any Age
Sex: Any
Travel: May Be Covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Phase 2
Recruiting
Sponsor: Jubilant DraxImage Inc.
Must not be taking: Valproic acid, QT prolonging drugs
Disqualifiers: Pregnancy, Breastfeeding, HIV, others
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests a combination of a radioactive drug and a cancer-fighting pill in patients with a specific type of neuroblastoma that hasn't responded well to other treatments. The radioactive drug kills cancer cells, and the pill makes them more vulnerable to the drug.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial protocol does not specify if you must stop taking your current medications. However, you cannot take valproic acid within 30 days of starting the study, and you should not be on medications that prolong the QT interval when you begin the trial.

What data supports the effectiveness of the drug combination Iobenguane (131-I) and Vorinostat for treating neuroblastoma?

Research shows that 131I-MIBG is effective in treating neuroblastoma, especially in relapsed cases, with response rates ranging from 0% to 75%. Vorinostat, when combined with 131I-MIBG, may enhance the treatment's effectiveness due to its properties that make cancer cells more sensitive to radiation.12345

Is the combination of Iobenguane (131-I) and Vorinostat safe for treating neuroblastoma?

Research shows that Iobenguane (131-I) is generally safe for treating neuroblastoma, even in high-risk cases, and Vorinostat is being studied for its potential to enhance this treatment. However, the combination's safety is still being evaluated, and more studies are needed to fully understand the risks.12456

What makes the drug combination of Iobenguane (131-I) and Vorinostat unique for treating neuroblastoma?

This drug combination is unique because it uses Iobenguane (131-I), a radiopharmaceutical that targets neuroblastoma cells, together with Vorinostat, which enhances the effect of radiation by making cancer cells more sensitive to it. This approach aims to improve the effectiveness of treatment for relapsed or hard-to-treat neuroblastoma.14578

Research Team

MD

Melda Dolan

Principal Investigator

Jubilant DraxImage Inc., dba Jubilant Radiopharma

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma that's come back or gotten worse. They should have recovered from previous treatments, not exceeded a certain dose of 131I-MIBG therapy, and have specific organ functions within normal ranges. Patients must be over 1 year old, able to perform daily activities at least half the time (Karnofsky/Lansky score ≥50%), and agree to use effective contraception if applicable.

Inclusion Criteria

My scans show that my cancer takes up a specific dye.
I have had platelet transfusions but my current platelet count is above 50,000/μL without needing a transfusion for the last week.
My thyroid function is normal, or if not, it's not a major concern.
See 24 more

Exclusion Criteria

I have undergone total body irradiation.
I have not taken valproic acid in the last 30 days.
I am not taking any medications that affect my heart's rhythm and haven't taken Pentamidine in the last week.
See 12 more

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

Up to 4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive 131I-MIBG as a single agent or in combination with Vorinostat. The treatment phase lasts up to 26 weeks for two treatments or 16 weeks for one treatment.

16-26 weeks

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, with assessments for disease progression and adverse events.

2 years

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • 131I-MIBG (Radioactive Agent)
  • Vorinostat (Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor)
Trial OverviewThe study tests how safe and effective the combination of two drugs, Iobenguane (131-I) and Vorinostat, is in treating recurrent or progressive high-risk neuroblastoma. It looks at whether this combo can help patients whose cancer has returned or continued to grow despite treatment.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: 131I-MIBG + VorinostatExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
131I-MIBG + Vorinostat
Group II: 131I-MIBGExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
131I-MIBG

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Jubilant DraxImage Inc.

Lead Sponsor

Trials
5
Recruited
15,900+

Findings from Research

A study involving 24 high-risk neuroblastoma patients showed that using 131I-mIBG as part of the treatment regimen is feasible and tolerable, especially when combined with myeloablative chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
The treatment resulted in improved outcomes for patients who had a partial response before receiving 131I-mIBG, with some achieving complete or very good partial responses, highlighting the potential effectiveness of this approach in specific patient groups.
Upfront consolidation treatment with 131I-mIbG followed by myeloablative chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in high-risk neuroblastoma.Feng, J., Cheng, FW., Leung, AW., et al.[2022]
The study involving 32 newly diagnosed stage 4 neuroblastoma patients demonstrated that upfront treatment with 131I-MIBG is feasible and can be administered within 2 weeks of diagnosis, with a response rate of 38% after this therapy.
Following myeloablative therapy and autologous stem cell rescue, the overall response rate for patients who received 131I-MIBG was 71%, significantly higher than the 36% response rate in the chemotherapy group, indicating that 131I-MIBG is an effective option in the treatment regimen.
Feasibility, toxicity and response of upfront metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy therapy followed by German Pediatric Oncology Group Neuroblastoma 2004 protocol in newly diagnosed stage 4 neuroblastoma patients.Kraal, KC., Bleeker, GM., van Eck-Smit, BL., et al.[2017]
In a pilot study involving 68 children with newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma, 86.8% completed induction chemotherapy and received 131 I-MIBG therapy, demonstrating the treatment's feasibility.
The study found that while there were some severe side effects, including sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), the 15 mCi/kg dose of 131 I-MIBG showed a high feasibility rate of 96.7%, supporting further investigation in a larger randomized trial.
A safety and feasibility trial of 131 I-MIBG in newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma: A Children's Oncology Group study.Weiss, BD., Yanik, G., Naranjo, A., et al.[2022]

References

Upfront consolidation treatment with 131I-mIbG followed by myeloablative chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in high-risk neuroblastoma. [2022]
Feasibility, toxicity and response of upfront metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy therapy followed by German Pediatric Oncology Group Neuroblastoma 2004 protocol in newly diagnosed stage 4 neuroblastoma patients. [2017]
A systematic review of 131I-meta iodobenzylguanidine molecular radiotherapy for neuroblastoma. [2022]
A safety and feasibility trial of 131 I-MIBG in newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma: A Children's Oncology Group study. [2022]
Phase I Study of Vorinostat as a Radiation Sensitizer with 131I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG) for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma. [2018]
Safety and efficacy of tandem 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine infusions in relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. [2013]
Feasibility of dosimetry-based high-dose 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine with topotecan as a radiosensitizer in children with metastatic neuroblastoma. [2013]
Upfront treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with a combination of 131I-MIBG and topotecan. [2015]