~198 spots leftby Jun 2025

Real-Time Feedback AI for Colonoscopy Quality Improvement

Recruiting at1 trial location
Pd
Overseen byPiet de Groen, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Travel: May Be Covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Academic
Recruiting
Sponsor: University of Minnesota
No Placebo Group

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests if giving doctors timely feedback during endoscopic exams can improve the quality of these procedures for patients.

Do I need to stop my current medications for this trial?

The trial protocol does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment AI program for colonoscopy?

Research shows that AI systems in colonoscopy can match human experts in detecting and classifying polyps, which are small growths in the colon that can lead to cancer. AI can also provide real-time feedback to improve the quality of colonoscopy procedures, potentially reducing the number of missed polyps and improving overall detection rates.12345

Is the AI system for colonoscopy generally safe for humans?

The research does not report any safety concerns related to the use of AI systems in colonoscopy, suggesting they are generally safe for human use.46789

How does the AI treatment for colonoscopy differ from other treatments?

This AI treatment for colonoscopy is unique because it provides real-time feedback to improve the quality of the procedure by detecting and characterizing polyps more accurately than traditional methods. It uses advanced artificial intelligence techniques to match or exceed human expert performance, reducing the risk of missed lesions and potentially preventing colorectal cancer.18101112

Research Team

Pd

Piet de Groen, MD

Principal Investigator

UMN

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for any endoscopist who is willing to participate and performs routine colonoscopy procedures. Specific details on exclusion criteria are not provided, but typically these would include factors that could interfere with the study or the safety of participants.

Inclusion Criteria

I am an endoscopist willing to participate and perform routine colonoscopies.

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive real-time feedback during colonoscopy to improve mucosal inspection and clearing of fecal debris

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

5 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • AI program for colonoscopy (Artificial Intelligence)
Trial OverviewThe trial is testing an AI program designed to provide real-time feedback during colonoscopies. The goal is to see if this technology can improve the quality of endoscopic examinations potentially leading to better outcomes in colorectal cancer screening.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Testing of degree of mucosal inspectionExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
AI provides real-time feedback related to circumferential views during endoscope removal
Group II: Testing of clearing of fecal debrisExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
AI provides real-time feedback related to removal of remaining fecal debris

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Minnesota

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,459
Recruited
1,623,000+
Shashank Priya profile image

Shashank Priya

University of Minnesota

Chief Executive Officer since 2023

PhD in Materials Engineering from Penn State

Charles Semba profile image

Charles Semba

University of Minnesota

Chief Medical Officer since 2021

MD from the University of Minnesota Medical School

University of Washington

Collaborator

Trials
1,858
Recruited
2,023,000+

Dr. Timothy H. Dellit

University of Washington

Chief Executive Officer since 2023

MD from University of Washington

Dr. Anneliese Schleyer

University of Washington

Chief Medical Officer since 2023

MD, MHA

Johns Hopkins University

Collaborator

Trials
2,366
Recruited
15,160,000+
Theodore DeWeese profile image

Theodore DeWeese

Johns Hopkins University

Chief Executive Officer since 2023

MD from an unspecified institution

Allen Kachalia profile image

Allen Kachalia

Johns Hopkins University

Chief Medical Officer since 2023

MD from an unspecified institution

Findings from Research

Computer-aided diagnosis in colonoscopy can significantly reduce the miss rates for polyps, which are currently as high as 22%, potentially decreasing the risk of interval colorectal cancers.
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have led to algorithms that can match the performance of human experts in detecting and characterizing polyps, enhancing the reliability of optical biopsy techniques.
Artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis in colonoscopy: current evidence and future directions.Ahmad, OF., Soares, AS., Mazomenos, E., et al.[2019]
The study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 67 endoscopists in identifying colorectal neoplasia, revealing a pooled sensitivity of 84.5% and specificity of 83% for detecting adenomas, indicating that while endoscopists perform well, there is still room for improvement.
Expert endoscopists demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (90.5%) compared to non-experts (75.5%), suggesting that targeted training and competence evaluation, especially in the context of artificial intelligence validation, could enhance diagnostic performance.
Endoscopists performance in optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps in artificial intelligence studies.Pecere, S., Antonelli, G., Dinis-Ribeiro, M., et al.[2022]
Colonoscopy is the most effective method for preventing colorectal cancer, but its success relies heavily on the quality of the procedure, including how well it is planned and performed.
Improvements in detection rates of polyps and adenomas can be achieved through better patient preparation, advanced endoscopic technologies like wide-angle endoscopes, and the use of artificial intelligence tools for enhanced polyp detection.
Optimizing Screening Colonoscopy: Strategies and Alternatives.Allescher, HD., Weingart, V.[2020]

References

Artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis in colonoscopy: current evidence and future directions. [2019]
Endoscopists performance in optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps in artificial intelligence studies. [2022]
Optimizing Screening Colonoscopy: Strategies and Alternatives. [2020]
Artificial Intelligence Applied to Colonoscopy: Is It Time to Take a Step Forward? [2023]
The National Endoscopy Database (NED) Automated Performance Reports to Improve Quality Outcomes Trial (APRIQOT) randomized controlled trial design. [2021]
Improving bowel preparation for colonoscopy with a smartphone application driven by artificial intelligence. [2023]
Artificial intelligence and colonoscopy experience: lessons from two randomised trials. [2022]
Development of a real-time endoscopic image diagnosis support system using deep learning technology in colonoscopy. [2021]
Real-time, computer-aided, detection-assisted colonoscopy eliminates differences in adenoma detection rate between trainee and experienced endoscopists. [2022]
Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates. [2023]
11.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy: Recent developments and future perspectives. [2021]
12.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Artificial Intelligence for Colonoscopy: Past, Present, and Future. [2022]