~287 spots leftby Jul 2027

LungTalk for Increasing Lung Cancer Screening

LC
Overseen byLisa Carter-Bawa, PhD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Travel: May Be Covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Academic
Recruiting
Sponsor: Hackensack Meridian Health
Disqualifiers: Lung cancer, Impaired decision-making, others
No Placebo Group

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial uses a program called LungTalk and Facebook ads to encourage high-risk individuals to get screened for lung cancer. The goal is to increase awareness and motivate people to undergo screening. By targeting those at higher risk, the intervention aims to catch lung cancer early when it is more treatable.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment LungTalk for increasing lung cancer screening?

The research suggests that tools and interventions that enhance shared decision-making, like the Risk-Based NLST Outcomes Tool and decision aids, can improve patient understanding and decision-making about lung cancer screening. These findings imply that similar tools, such as LungTalk, may also be effective in increasing lung cancer screening by facilitating better communication and informed decision-making.12345

How is the LungTalk treatment different from other lung cancer screening methods?

LungTalk is unique because it uses a digital communication tool to increase awareness and knowledge about lung cancer screening, leveraging social media to reach high-risk individuals who may not be aware of or have access to traditional screening methods.16789

Research Team

LC

Lisa Carter-Bawa, PhD

Principal Investigator

Hackensack Meridian Health

Eligibility Criteria

The INSPIRE-Lung Study is for individuals who have a history of heavy smoking (at least 20 pack-years), including current smokers or those who quit within the last 15 years. It's not for people who've already had lung cancer screening, are being monitored for lung nodules, have been diagnosed with lung cancer, or have impaired decision-making.

Inclusion Criteria

You have smoked an average of one pack a day for 20 years or more.
I am a current smoker or quit smoking within the last 15 years.

Exclusion Criteria

I am capable of making my own decisions.
I have had a low-dose CT scan for lung cancer and am being monitored for lung nodules.
I have been diagnosed with lung cancer.

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Intervention

Participants receive either the tailored health communication intervention 'LungTalk' or the non-tailored ACS Lung Screening Informational Video

6 months
Online intervention

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for effectiveness of the intervention, including self-efficacy, perceived risk, and screening uptake

6 months

Long-term Monitoring

Reaching screening eligible individuals via social media and measuring engagement metrics

Up to 4 years

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • LungTalk (Behavioral Intervention)
  • Non-tailored intervention - Standard of practice (Behavioral Intervention)
Trial OverviewThis study tests 'LungTalk', a communication intervention aimed at increasing lung cancer screening rates among high-risk groups using Facebook-targeted advertisements. It compares LungTalk to standard practices without tailored interventions.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Tailored health communication intervention (LungTalk)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
Participants will receive the tailored health intervention "LungTalk". LungTalk is a 10-15 minute long computer-tailored health communication and decision-making tool that is theoretically grounded in the Conceptual Model on Lung Cancer Screening Participation.
Group II: Non-tailored InterventionActive Control1 Intervention
Participants will receive non-tailored American Cancer Society (ACS) Lung Screening Informational Video as per standard of care. ACS Lung Screening Informational Video (ACS LSIV) is a non-tailored 5-minute video from the American Cancer Society about lung cancer screening designed for the lay individual.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Hackensack Meridian Health

Lead Sponsor

Trials
141
Recruited
42,900+
Dr. Gregory J. Rokosz profile image

Dr. Gregory J. Rokosz

Hackensack Meridian Health

Chief Medical Officer since 2023

DO from New York College of Osteopathic Medicine, JD from Seton Hall University School of Law

Robert C. Garrett profile image

Robert C. Garrett

Hackensack Meridian Health

Chief Executive Officer since 2016

Bachelor's degree in Health Administration from Washington University in St. Louis

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator

Trials
14,080
Recruited
41,180,000+
Dr. Douglas R. Lowy profile image

Dr. Douglas R. Lowy

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Chief Executive Officer since 2023

MD from New York University School of Medicine

Dr. Monica Bertagnolli profile image

Dr. Monica Bertagnolli

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Chief Medical Officer since 2022

MD from Harvard Medical School

Findings from Research

The study aims to implement a tailored approach to shared decision-making (SDM) for lung cancer screening (LCS) within the VA New England Health Care Network, addressing barriers at multiple levels to enhance patient-centered care.
By evaluating the effectiveness of this multilevel implementation strategy, the research seeks to improve the quality of SDM for LCS, potentially informing nationwide practices and promoting better patient-provider interactions.
Implementing Shared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening across a Veterans Health Administration Hospital Network: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study Protocol.Khanna, A., Fix, GM., McCullough, MB., et al.[2022]
A single-page, paper-based encounter decision aid (EDA) used during shared decision-making visits for lung cancer screening significantly reduced patient decisional conflict, as indicated by a drop in the Decisional Conflict Scale score from 35.0 to 0.2 (p < 0.001).
While 28% of patients understood the mortality benefit of lung cancer screening after the visit, a much higher percentage (82%) grasped the frequency of abnormal screening results, highlighting the need for improved patient education on the mortality benefits of screening.
Pilot Study of an Encounter Decision Aid for Lung Cancer Screening.Ito Fukunaga, M., Balwan, A., Janis, JA., et al.[2023]
A systematic review of 24 studies involving 6689 patients found that only 57% adhered to Lung-RADS-recommended screening intervals, indicating suboptimal compliance that could reduce the effectiveness of lung cancer screening.
Adherence rates were significantly higher for patients with Lung-RADS scores of 3 to 4 compared to those with scores of 1 to 2, suggesting that patients with more concerning findings are more likely to follow up with screenings.
Patient Adherence to Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System-Recommended Screening Intervals in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Lin, Y., Fu, M., Ding, R., et al.[2022]

References

Patient Perspectives on the Risk-Based NLST Outcomes Tool for Lung Cancer Screening. [2022]
Effectiveness of a Patient Education Class to Enhance Knowledge about Lung Cancer Screening: a Quality Improvement Evaluation. [2021]
Implementing Shared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening across a Veterans Health Administration Hospital Network: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study Protocol. [2022]
Pilot Study of an Encounter Decision Aid for Lung Cancer Screening. [2023]
Patient Adherence to Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System-Recommended Screening Intervals in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [2022]
Leveraging social media to increase lung cancer screening awareness, knowledge and uptake among high-risk populations (The INSPIRE-Lung Study): Study protocol of design and methods of a community-based randomized controlled trial. [2023]
Adapting Community Educational Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparing the Feasibility and Efficacy of a Lung Cancer Screening Educational Intervention by Mode of Delivery. [2023]
The tobacco quitline setting as a teachable moment: The Educating Quitline Users About Lung (EQUAL) cancer screening randomized trial. [2023]
Identifying Community Perspectives for a Lung Cancer Screening Awareness Campaign in Appalachia Kentucky: The Terminate Lung Cancer (TLC) Study. [2018]