~31 spots leftby Aug 2028

Radiation Therapy for Neuroblastoma

Recruiting at 1 trial location
DK
Overseen byDavid E. Kozono
Age: Any Age
Sex: Any
Travel: May Be Covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Academic
Recruiting
Sponsor: Brigham and Women's Hospital
Disqualifiers: Pregnancy, Breastfeeding, others
No Placebo Group

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial collects biological samples from children with specific cancers who are receiving radiation therapy. The goal is to understand how radiation affects both cancerous and normal cells, which can help improve future treatments.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. However, if you are on corticosteroids, you must be on a stable or decreasing dose for at least 3 days before a baseline MRI scan.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment 131I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) for neuroblastoma?

Research shows that 131I-MIBG is an effective treatment for neuroblastoma, with response rates greater than 30% in patients with difficult-to-treat cases. It is considered safe, although it can cause some blood-related side effects.12345

Is radiation therapy with 131I-MIBG safe for humans?

Radiation therapy with 131I-MIBG for neuroblastoma is generally considered safe, but it can cause side effects like myelosuppression (a decrease in bone marrow activity) and oral mucositis (painful inflammation and sores in the mouth). Safety measures are in place to protect patients, family caregivers, and medical staff from radiation exposure.34567

How is the treatment 131I-MIBG with EBRT different from other treatments for neuroblastoma?

The treatment 131I-MIBG is unique because it specifically targets neuroblastoma cells, delivering radiation directly to the tumor, which may result in more effective and less toxic treatment compared to conventional external-beam radiotherapy. It is particularly used for patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma, where other treatments may not be effective.34589

Research Team

DK

David E. Kozono

Principal Investigator

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for children and young adults with specific types of brain tumors or high-risk neuroblastoma. Participants must meet certain age, health, and diagnostic criteria, have stable vital functions, and not be pregnant or breastfeeding. They should also be enrolled in one of the specified clinical trials related to their condition.

Inclusion Criteria

My bone marrow, kidneys, liver, and nervous system are functioning well.
Availability of tumor tissue, blood and/or CSF biospecimens
I am aged 1-30 with a specific high-risk neuroblastoma and have not had certain treatments.
See 1 more

Exclusion Criteria

Inability to follow the procedures of the study
Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Radiation Treatment

Participants receive radiation therapy, including external beam radiation for DMG and 131I-MIBG radiopharmaceutical for neuroblastoma

Varies by individual treatment plan
Multiple visits for radiation sessions

Sample Collection

Collection of biospecimens including blood, CSF, and tumor samples before, during, and after radiation treatment

Concurrent with treatment phase

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety, effectiveness, and quality of life outcomes after treatment

Up to 3 years
Regular follow-up visits for monitoring

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • 131I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) (Radiation)
  • External beam radiotherapy (Radiation)
Trial OverviewThe MCT aims to collect detailed biological data from patients undergoing radiation therapy for tumor treatment. It involves external beam radiotherapy and a radioactive drug called 131I-MIBG to understand how these treatments work against tumors while assessing potential side effects.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: NeuroblastomaExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Subjects with high-risk neuroblastoma on COG ANBL1531 (NCT03126916) Arm B
Group II: Diffuse Midline GliomaExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Subjects with diffuse midline glioma on PNOC023 (NCT04732065) Arm A or B

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,694
Recruited
14,790,000+

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator

Trials
14,080
Recruited
41,180,000+

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Collaborator

Trials
1,128
Recruited
382,000+

University of California, San Francisco

Collaborator

Trials
2,636
Recruited
19,080,000+

Findings from Research

In a study of 25 patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma, individualized dosimetry-based I-131 mIBG therapy resulted in a 58% overall response rate, indicating effective treatment outcomes.
Despite significant acute toxicities, such as grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurring in 82% and 71% of treatments respectively, these side effects were manageable and resolved with appropriate care, suggesting that the therapy can be safely administered with proper support.
Individualized 131I-mIBG therapy in the management of refractory and relapsed neuroblastoma.George, SL., Falzone, N., Chittenden, S., et al.[2018]
In a trial involving 105 patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma, the combination of vorinostat and MIBG showed the highest response rate (32%) compared to MIBG alone (14%) and MIBG with vincristine and irinotecan (14%).
The study indicated that while vorinostat combined with MIBG had manageable toxicity, the vincristine and irinotecan combination did not enhance the response rate and was associated with higher toxicity levels.
Randomized Phase II Trial of MIBG Versus MIBG, Vincristine, and Irinotecan Versus MIBG and Vorinostat for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: A Report From NANT Consortium.DuBois, SG., Granger, MM., Groshen, S., et al.[2022]
In a study of 76 heavily pretreated patients with relapsed neuroblastoma, early second treatment with (131) I-MIBG was found to be safe and effective, with 39% of patients experiencing a reduction in overall disease burden after two treatments.
The response rate to the second (131) I-MIBG infusion was 29%, and it was noted that patients who appeared to have a complete response on initial scans still had significant disease visible on subsequent imaging, suggesting the need for continued treatment even in cases of apparent remission.
Safety and efficacy of tandem 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine infusions in relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma.Johnson, K., McGlynn, B., Saggio, J., et al.[2013]

References

Individualized 131I-mIBG therapy in the management of refractory and relapsed neuroblastoma. [2018]
Randomized Phase II Trial of MIBG Versus MIBG, Vincristine, and Irinotecan Versus MIBG and Vorinostat for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: A Report From NANT Consortium. [2022]
Tumor response and toxicity with multiple infusions of high dose 131I-MIBG for refractory neuroblastoma. [2013]
Safety and efficacy of tandem 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine infusions in relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. [2013]
Impact of Whole-Body Radiation Dose on Response and Toxicity in Patients With Neuroblastoma After Therapy With 131 I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG). [2020]
Severe oral mucositis after therapeutic administration of [131I]MIBG in a child with neuroblastoma. [2013]
Pediatric 131I-MIBG Therapy for Neuroblastoma: Whole-Body 131I-MIBG Clearance, Radiation Doses to Patients, Family Caregivers, Medical Staff, and Radiation Safety Measures. [2018]
Is there a benefit of 131 I-MIBG therapy in the treatment of children with stage 4 neuroblastoma? A retrospective evaluation of The German Neuroblastoma Trial NB97 and implications for The German Neuroblastoma Trial NB2004. [2022]
Phase I dose escalation of 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine with autologous bone marrow support in refractory neuroblastoma. [2022]