~33 spots leftby Dec 2025

Implicit Priming for Obesity

JT
Overseen byJason R. Tregellas, PhD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Travel: May Be Covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Academic
Recruiting
Sponsor: University of Colorado, Denver
Disqualifiers: Mri contraindications, pregnancy

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The purpose of this study is to determine how different behavioral interventions designed to alter food perceptions and behaviors affect brain responses to food, eating behaviors, and body weight.

Do I need to stop taking my current medications for the trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Implicit Priming for Obesity?

Research shows that interventions targeting implicit biases, like Go/No-Go tasks, can have small positive effects on eating behaviors by altering automatic responses to food. Additionally, attention modification training has been shown to reduce overeating in obese children by training them to focus away from food cues.12345

Is implicit priming therapy safe for humans?

The studies on implicit priming interventions, such as attention modification and approach-avoidance training, do not report any safety concerns, suggesting they are generally safe for use in humans.12367

How does the treatment 'Implicit Priming for Obesity' differ from other treatments for obesity?

Implicit Priming for Obesity is unique because it focuses on modifying attentional biases towards food cues, training individuals to unconsciously shift their attention away from food, unlike traditional treatments that may focus on diet or exercise. This approach is based on cognitive bias modification techniques, which have been used in other areas like anxiety and substance abuse, and it targets the underlying mental processes that contribute to overeating.12489

Research Team

JT

Jason R. Tregellas, PhD

Principal Investigator

University of Colorado, Denver

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults aged 18-65 with obesity, defined as having a BMI of 27 or greater. It's not suitable for pregnant individuals or those who cannot undergo MRI scans due to metal or electronic devices in their body.

Inclusion Criteria

BMI of 27 or greater
I am between 18 and 65 years old.

Exclusion Criteria

MRI contraindications (e.g., metal or electronic devices in the body)
Pregnancy

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo weekly behavioral interventions, including active or control implicit priming and a food exposure task, for 12 weeks

12 weeks
12 visits (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for changes in food intake, body weight, fat mass, and brain responses to food cues

4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Active Implicit Priming (Behavioral Intervention)
  • Control Implicit Priming (Behavioral Intervention)
  • Food Exposure Task (Behavioral Intervention)
Trial OverviewThe study tests how 'Active Implicit Priming' and 'Control Implicit Priming' interventions influence brain reactions to food, eating habits, and weight when compared to a 'Food Exposure Task'.
Participant Groups
3Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Placebo Group
Group I: Active Implicit PrimingExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Participants will complete active implicit priming, in which food images are implicitly primed (i.e., below conscious awareness) with images of positive or negative affect. This will be completed on a weekly basis for 12 weeks, for approximately 10 minutes each time.
Group II: Food Exposure TaskActive Control1 Intervention
Participants will complete a Food Exposure Task, in which they will be asked to smell, feel, lick, and imagine eating food items, but without actually eating them. This will be completed on a weekly basis for 12 weeks, for approximately 10-30 minutes each time.
Group III: Control Implicit PrimingPlacebo Group1 Intervention
Participants will complete control implicit priming, which matches the active intervention, but with neutral stimuli as primes. This will be completed on a weekly basis for 12 weeks, for approximately 10 minutes each time.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Colorado, Denver

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,842
Recruited
3,028,000+
Aviva Abosch profile image

Aviva Abosch

University of Colorado, Denver

Chief Medical Officer since 2019

MD

Uday B. Kompella profile image

Uday B. Kompella

University of Colorado, Denver

Chief Executive Officer since 2015

PhD in Pharmaceutical Sciences

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Collaborator

Trials
2,513
Recruited
4,366,000+
Dr. Griffin P. Rodgers profile image

Dr. Griffin P. Rodgers

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Chief Executive Officer since 2007

MD, M.A.C.P.

Dr. Griffin P. Rodgers profile image

Dr. Griffin P. Rodgers

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Chief Medical Officer since 2007

MD, M.A.C.P.

Findings from Research

This meta-analysis of 30 randomized controlled trials found that interventions targeting implicit biases, particularly through Go/No-Go tasks, have a small but significant effect on improving dietary behaviors and reducing implicit biases related to eating.
The study suggests that changes in implicit biases are linked to changes in eating behavior, indicating that these interventions could be useful for promoting healthier dietary choices, although further research is needed to assess their practical application in everyday life.
Implicit process interventions in eating behaviour: a meta-analysis examining mediators and moderators.Aulbach, MB., Knittle, K., Haukkala, A.[2020]
A single session of attention modification training (AMP) significantly reduced overeating behaviors in overweight and obese children, as evidenced by decreased calorie consumption during free access sessions compared to a control group.
Children in the AMP group showed a trend towards improved attentional bias away from food cues, suggesting that this training could be a promising intervention for managing overeating in this population.
A pilot study evaluating a one-session attention modification training to decrease overeating in obese children.Boutelle, KN., Kuckertz, JM., Carlson, J., et al.[2021]
A study involving 133 children aged 7-10 demonstrated that a go/no-go task, which modified implicit reactions to energy-dense snacks, led to a significant 34% reduction in calorie intake compared to a control task.
The effectiveness of the go/no-go task in reducing snack consumption was consistent regardless of whether children were exposed to food or nonfood advertisements, indicating a robust intervention strategy for promoting healthier eating habits.
Targeting implicit approach reactions to snack food in children: Effects on intake.Folkvord, F., Veling, H., Hoeken, H.[2019]

References

Implicit process interventions in eating behaviour: a meta-analysis examining mediators and moderators. [2020]
A pilot study evaluating a one-session attention modification training to decrease overeating in obese children. [2021]
Targeting implicit approach reactions to snack food in children: Effects on intake. [2019]
Longevity of attentional bias modification effects for food cues in overweight and obese individuals. [2018]
Retraining of automatic action tendencies in individuals with obesity: A randomized controlled trial. [2019]
Battle of plates: a pilot study of an approach-avoidance training for overweight children and adolescents. [2023]
The effect of combined avoidance and control training on implicit food evaluation and choice. [2019]
The Role of Motivation to Reduce Obesity among Elderly People: Response to Priming Temptation in Obese Individuals. [2018]
Approach Bias Modification in Food Craving-A Proof-of-Concept Study. [2018]