~6 spots leftby Oct 2025

Dry Needling vs. Manual Therapy for Headaches

DG
Overseen byDavid Griswold, PhD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Travel: May Be Covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Academic
Recruiting
Sponsor: Youngstown State University
Must not be taking: Corticosteroids
Disqualifiers: Migraine, Malignancy, Myelopathy, others
No Placebo Group

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial compares dry needling and orthopedic manual therapy for patients with headaches caused by neck problems. Dry needling uses thin needles to relieve muscle tension, while manual therapy involves hands-on adjustments to the neck. Both treatments aim to reduce headache pain by addressing issues in the neck. Dry needling is a treatment technique used by clinicians to relieve symptoms in patients with tension-type headache (TTH), cervicogenic headache (CGH), or migraine.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It would be best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What data supports the effectiveness of this treatment for headaches?

Research shows that both dry needling and manual therapy can reduce neck pain intensity and improve neck movement. In particular, manual therapy has been effective in reducing pain sensitivity and improving neck function, which may be beneficial for treating headaches related to neck issues.12345

Is dry needling generally safe for humans?

A study surveyed physiotherapists in Ireland about adverse events (unwanted side effects) from trigger point dry needling and found no existing studies on its safety, suggesting limited data on potential risks.13467

How does the treatment of dry needling and manual therapy for headaches differ from other treatments?

Dry needling and manual therapy for headaches are unique because they target myofascial trigger points (tight areas in muscles) to relieve tension and pain, which is different from standard headache treatments that often focus on medication. This approach combines physical techniques to improve muscle function and reduce pain, offering an alternative for those who may not respond well to traditional drug therapies.12348

Research Team

DG

David Griswold, PhD

Principal Investigator

Associate Professor at Youngstown State University

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults over 18 with cervicogenic headaches (CGH) occurring at least once a week for more than three months. Participants must meet specific criteria and have neck dysfunction. It's not for those with mild headache pain, non-English speakers, certain medical conditions or surgeries, metal allergies, migraine or tension-type headaches, needle phobia, or cervical arterial issues.

Inclusion Criteria

I have had headaches at least once a week for more than 3 months.
I am 18 years old or older.
I have had headaches at least once a week for more than 3 months.
See 2 more

Exclusion Criteria

I do not speak English.
I experience tension-type headaches.
I do not have conditions like cancer, spinal cord issues, fractures, metabolic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, or long-term steroid use that would prevent me from receiving certain treatments.
See 8 more

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive either cervical-cranial dry needling or orthopedic manual therapy, along with thoracic manipulation and exercise, 2x/week for 2 weeks and then 1-2x/week for 2 weeks

4 weeks
6-8 visits (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment with outcomes collected at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months

12 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Cervical-cranial dry needling (Behavioural Intervention)
  • Orthopedic manual therapy (Behavioural Intervention)
Trial OverviewThe study compares the effectiveness of cervical-cranial dry needling versus orthopedic manual therapy in managing CGH symptoms. Both treatments are accompanied by patient education, thoracic manipulation, and exercise. The outcomes will be measured at various intervals up to one year.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Cervical-cranial dry needlingExperimental Treatment4 Interventions
Patients randomized to this arm will receive cervical-cranial dry needling, thoracic manipulation, and exercise.
Group II: Orthopedic Manual TherapyActive Control4 Interventions
Patients randomized to this arm will receive orthopedic manual therapy to cervical spine, thoracic manipulation, and exercise.

Cervical-cranial dry needling is already approved in Canada for the following indications:

🇨🇦
Approved in Canada as Dry Needling for:
  • Cervicogenic Headache
  • Musculoskeletal Pain
  • Neuromusculoskeletal Conditions

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Youngstown State University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
27
Recruited
2,000+

Franklin Pierce University

Collaborator

Trials
16
Recruited
1,100+

Findings from Research

The original study compared the effectiveness of trigger point dry needling and manual therapy for treating chronic neck pain, providing insights into short-term outcomes for patients.
The correction highlights the importance of accurate reporting in clinical trials, ensuring that findings on treatment efficacy are reliable and can guide future therapeutic approaches.
February 2015 erratum.[2015]
In a study of 101 participants with chronic mechanical neck pain, dry needling combined with manual therapy (DN+MT) significantly reduced pain intensity and improved pain pressure threshold compared to sham dry needling with manual therapy (SDN+MT).
The DN+MT group showed substantial improvements in cervical range of motion and neck disability after treatment, indicating that this combined approach is more effective for managing chronic neck pain than the sham treatment.
Efficacy of dry needling as an adjunct to manual therapy for patients with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomised clinical trial.Gallego-Sendarrubias, GM., Rodríguez-Sanz, D., Calvo-Lobo, C., et al.[2021]
In a study involving 69 patients with cervicogenic headache, dry needling combined with conventional physiotherapy significantly reduced headache intensity and neck disability compared to both sham and control groups, with improvements observed at multiple follow-up points (1, 3, and 6 months).
The dry needling group also showed greater cervical range of motion and better performance of deep cervical flexor muscles compared to the other groups, indicating its potential benefits in managing cervicogenic headaches, although the overall clinical significance of these improvements was considered small.
The Effect of Adding Dry Needling to Physical Therapy in the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Mousavi-Khatir, SR., Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C., Saadat, P., et al.[2022]

References

February 2015 erratum. [2015]
Comparison of Dry Needling versus Orthopedic Manual Therapy in Patients with Myofascial Chronic Neck Pain: A Single-Blind, Randomized Pilot Study. [2022]
Efficacy of dry needling as an adjunct to manual therapy for patients with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomised clinical trial. [2021]
The Effect of Adding Dry Needling to Physical Therapy in the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache: A Randomized Controlled Trial. [2022]
Immediate Effects of Dry Needling and Myofascial Release on Local and Widespread Pressure Pain Threshold in Individuals With Active Upper Trapezius Trigger Points: A Randomized Clinical Trial. [2021]
Adverse events following trigger point dry needling: a prospective survey of chartered physiotherapists. [2022]
The utilization of dry needling and an upper extremity exercise program for individuals with cervicogenic headaches: A pilot study. [2022]
Evidence for the use of dry needling and physiotherapy in the management of cervicogenic or tension-type headache: a systematic review. [2022]