← Back to Search

Evaluating Voiding Trial Volume for Urinary Retention

N/A
Waitlist Available
Led By David Lovejoy, MD
Research Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Eligibility Criteria Checklist
Specific guidelines that determine who can or cannot participate in a clinical trial
Must have
Be older than 18 years old
Timeline
Screening 3 weeks
Treatment Varies
Follow Up day 7
Awards & highlights
No Placebo-Only Group

Summary

This trial tests if patients can urinate on their own after surgery to catch and treat urinary problems early. It aims to prevent complications like bladder damage and infections, improving patient comfort and satisfaction.

Who is the study for?
This trial is for nonpregnant women over 18 who are having surgery for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. It's not open to those with preoperative voiding issues requiring self-catheterization, recurrent UTIs, bladder injuries during surgery, intolerance to at least 150cc backfill, neuromuscular disorders, or pregnancy.
What is being tested?
The study is looking at the best volume of fluid to use when testing if patients can urinate properly after urogynecologic surgery. Women will be randomly placed into a control group or a test group to determine this optimal volume.
What are the potential side effects?
While specific side effects aren't detailed here, potential risks may include discomfort from the backfill procedure and symptoms related to urinary retention such as pain or difficulty urinating.

Timeline

Screening ~ 3 weeks
Treatment ~ Varies
Follow Up ~day 7
This trial's timeline: 3 weeks for screening, Varies for treatment, and day 7 for reporting.

Treatment Details

Study Objectives

Study objectives can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.
Primary study objectives
difference in acute voiding dysfunction between a backfill assisted voiding trial
Secondary study objectives
average number of days postoperatively, that require catheterization
proportion of patients developing bladder pain or pressure
proportion of patients developing overactive bladder symptoms
+2 more

Awards & Highlights

No Placebo-Only Group
All patients enrolled in this study will receive some form of active treatment.

Trial Design

2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: control group (voids 2/3 of the volume backfilled)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
control group
Group II: test group (voids ½ of the total volume backfilled)Active Control1 Intervention
test group)
Treatment
First Studied
Drug Approval Stage
How many patients have taken this drug
Control Group
2012
Completed Phase 2
~2470

Research Highlights

Information in this section is not a recommendation. We encourage patients to speak with their healthcare team when evaluating any treatment decision.
Mechanism Of Action
Side Effect Profile
Prior Approvals
Other Research
Common treatments for urinary retention include catheterization, pharmacologic treatments, and surgical interventions. Catheterization, either intermittent or indwelling, mechanically drains the bladder to prevent over-distention and potential damage. Pharmacologic treatments, such as alpha-1-adrenergic antagonists, work by relaxing the smooth muscles of the bladder neck and prostate, facilitating easier urine flow. Surgical interventions, like transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), physically remove obstructions to improve urine flow. These treatments are crucial for urinary retention patients as they help prevent complications like bladder over-distention, ischemia, and long-term voiding dysfunction, thereby improving quality of life and reducing the risk of permanent bladder damage.
Urodynamics of the female lower urinary tract.Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation as an effective treatment of refractory lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis: preliminary data from a multicentre, prospective, open label trial.The role of anticholinergics in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Find a Location

Who is running the clinical trial?

Wake Forest University Health SciencesLead Sponsor
1,397 Previous Clinical Trials
2,460,030 Total Patients Enrolled
4 Trials studying Urinary Incontinence
595 Patients Enrolled for Urinary Incontinence
David Lovejoy, MDPrincipal InvestigatorWake Forest University Health Sciences

Media Library

control group (voids 2/3 of the volume backfilled) Clinical Trial Eligibility Overview. Trial Name: NCT05820139 — N/A
Urinary Incontinence Research Study Groups: control group (voids 2/3 of the volume backfilled), test group (voids ½ of the total volume backfilled)
Urinary Incontinence Clinical Trial 2023: control group (voids 2/3 of the volume backfilled) Highlights & Side Effects. Trial Name: NCT05820139 — N/A
control group (voids 2/3 of the volume backfilled) 2023 Treatment Timeline for Medical Study. Trial Name: NCT05820139 — N/A
~43 spots leftby Dec 2025