Community Activity Program for Depression

(ARCH Trial)

Recruiting in Palo Alto (17 mi)

Age: 18+

Sex: Any

Travel: May Be Covered

Time Reimbursement: Varies

Trial Phase: Academic

Waitlist Available

Sponsor: Rush University Medical Center

Disqualifiers: Under 18, Not fluent English, Uncontrolled mental illness, Suicidality risk, others

No Placebo Group

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This project tests whether a health outreach intervention that promotes engagement in rewarding, community-based recreational and social activities can produce greater improvements in depressive symptoms, adiposity, and physical activity among people from underresourced communities than traditional health outreach approaches.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It is best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment ARCH, Traditional Health Outreach, Community-Based Health Outreach, Health Promotion Intervention for depression?

Research shows that community engagement and planning (CEP) approaches, similar to the Community-Based Health Outreach, are more effective than technical assistance in improving mental health-related quality of life and reducing hospitalizations for depression in underserved communities. ^{1 2 3 4 5}

Is the Community Activity Program for Depression safe for humans?

The research articles reviewed do not provide specific safety data for the Community Activity Program for Depression or its related interventions. However, community-based health interventions generally focus on promoting healthy behaviors and have not been associated with significant safety concerns in humans. ^{6 7 8 9 10}

How is the Community Activity Program for Depression treatment different from other treatments for depression?

The Community Activity Program for Depression, involving ARCH and Traditional Health Outreach, is unique because it focuses on community-based interventions that leverage existing health systems to manage depression, especially in areas with limited mental health resources. This approach emphasizes community involvement and health promotion, which can be more accessible and culturally relevant compared to traditional clinical treatments. ^{11 12 13 14 15}

Research Team

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for people who have used a health center in the past 2 years, live in deprived neighborhoods, feel persistently sad or depressed (with a specific test score showing depression), are overweight, and don't get much exercise. It's not for everyone; there are some rules about who can join.

Inclusion Criteria

My BMI is 28 or higher.

Physically inactive according to the 2018 U.S. Physical Activity Guidelines:96 less than 150 minutes of moderate intensity, 75 minutes of vigorous intensity, or an equivalent combination of moderate and vigorous intensity activity, per week based on a 7-day accelerometry protocol

Elevated depressive symptoms (10-item CES-D score≥10)94,95

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive the ARCH intervention or traditional health outreach for 4 months to improve depressive symptoms, physical activity, and weight management

16 weeks

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

• ARCH (Behavioral Intervention)
• Traditional Health Outreach (Behavioral Intervention)

Trial Overview The study compares two ways to help people with depression from areas without many resources: ARCH promotes fun activities and socializing, while Traditional Health Outreach gives standard health advice. The goal is to see which one better reduces sadness, weight issues, and gets people moving more.

Participant Groups

Group I: ARCH Experimental Treatment 1 Intervention

4-month health outreach intervention to improve depressive symptoms, physical activity, and weight management

Group II: Traditional Health Outreach Active Control 1 Intervention

4-month health outreach intervention focused on screening, referral to healthcare resources, and support

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Rush University Medical Center

Lead Sponsor

Trials

448

Recruited

247,000+

Dr. Omar B. Lateef

Rush University Medical Center

Chief Executive Officer since 2022

MD from Des Moines University, Fellowship in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Rush University Medical Center

Dr. Paul E. Casey

Rush University Medical Center

Chief Medical Officer since 2021

MD, MBA

University of Chicago

Collaborator

Trials

1,086

Recruited

844,000+

Pete Salzmann

University of Chicago

Chief Executive Officer since 2018

MD from University of Chicago’s Pritzker School of Medicine, MBA from Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business

Anh Nguyen

University of Chicago

Chief Medical Officer

MD from Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, MBA from University of Chicago

Findings from Research

Community Engagement and Planning (CEP) significantly improved mental health outcomes for clients with multiple chronic medical conditions (MCC) compared to Resources for Services (RS), including reduced depression rates and improved mental wellness at 6 months.

CEP also led to decreased work-loss days and lower risks of behavioral health hospitalizations and chronic homelessness among MCC clients, highlighting its effectiveness in enhancing quality of life for this vulnerable group.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Comparative Effectiveness of Coalitions Versus Technical Assistance for Depression Quality Improvement in Persons with Multiple Chronic Conditions. Springgate, B., Tang, L., Ong, M., et al.[2019]

The Supporting Wellness working group successfully established a collaborative project in Los Angeles that focuses on mental health advocacy, including securing a position on a countywide committee to influence mental health policy and funding.

The project highlights the importance of community perspectives in developing effective mental health interventions, emphasizing that significant time and effort are needed to build the necessary infrastructure for successful community-academic partnerships.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Supporting wellness through policy and advocacy: a case history of a working group in a community partnership initiative to address depression. Stockdale, S., Patel, K., Gray, R., et al.[2016]

This scoping review analyzed 44 articles on community-based health promotion interventions, primarily focusing on obesity prevention and healthy nutrition for children and adolescents, with most studies conducted in the USA.

The review found a variety of evaluation designs used, including randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs, but noted a lack of comprehensive evaluation frameworks, making it challenging to derive holistic evaluation approaches from existing literature.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Evaluation of community-based health promotion interventions in children and adolescents in high-income countries: a scoping review on strategies and methods used. Bader, B., Coenen, M., Hummel, J., et al.[2023]

A review of 27 community-based intervention studies showed that while 88% reported participation rates among the target audience, only 11% reported participation rates among community organizations, highlighting a gap in understanding how well interventions are adopted in real-world settings.

Only 30% of studies assessed whether individuals maintained behavior changes over time, and none reported on the long-term institutionalization of interventions, indicating a need for better reporting on external validity to enhance the generalizability of findings.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results? Dzewaltowski, DA., Estabrooks, PA., Klesges, LM., et al.[2019]

The Community Education Monitoring System (CEMS) effectively tracks various aspects of behavior change interventions, such as the number and type of activities, target audiences, and funding sources, using data from established health programs like the Stanford Five-City Project.

CEMS enhances program evaluation by providing a structured way to measure program reach and effectiveness, allowing for better comparisons across different health promotion initiatives and ensuring that theoretical frameworks are applied in practice.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A community education monitoring system: methods from the Stanford Five-City Project, the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Pawtucket Heart Health Program. Flora, JA., Lefebvre, RC., Murray, DM., et al.[2019]

The eB4CAST framework is a systematic tool designed to enhance the usability and sustainability of community-based programs by effectively capturing and transforming research findings into actionable dissemination reports.

By utilizing both direct and indirect data collection methods, eB4CAST forecasts program needs and highlights impacts, making it adaptable for various public health interventions and ensuring ongoing evaluation and responsiveness to community needs.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

eB4CAST: An Evidence-Based Tool to Promote Dissemination and Implementation in Community-Based, Public Health Research. Olfert, MD., Hagedorn, RL., Barr, ML., et al.[2023]

Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) significantly reduced depressive symptoms and increased perceived social support among elderly participants immediately after a 12-week intervention, compared to a control group.

The physical fitness exercise program also effectively decreased depressive symptoms over time and improved physical health outcomes, such as increased walking distance and better quality of life, suggesting it may be a more beneficial long-term intervention for elderly adults with depression.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Physical fitness exercise versus cognitive behavior therapy on reducing the depressive symptoms among community-dwelling elderly adults: A randomized controlled trial. Huang, TT., Liu, CB., Tsai, YH., et al.[2018]

The expert panel recommended home or primary care clinic-based depression care management interventions and individual cognitive behavioral therapy as effective treatments for late-life depression, based on a systematic review of evidence.

Interventions such as education, skills training, and physical rehabilitation were not recommended as primary treatments for late-life depression, highlighting the need for targeted approaches that specifically address depression.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Recommendations for treating depression in community-based older adults. Steinman, LE., Frederick, JT., Prohaska, T., et al.[2018]

References

1. United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Comparative Effectiveness of Coalitions Versus Technical Assistance for Depression Quality Improvement in Persons with Multiple Chronic Conditions. [2019]

2. United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A Community-Partnered, Participatory, Cluster-Randomized Study of Depression Care Quality Improvement: Three-Year Outcomes. [2022]

3. Switzerland pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Partnering with community-based organizations to improve equitable access to depression care for underserved older adults in the U.S.: Qualitative formative research. [2023]

4. United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

12-month outcomes of community engagement versus technical assistance to implement depression collaborative care: a partnered, cluster, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial. [2023]

5. United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Supporting wellness through policy and advocacy: a case history of a working group in a community partnership initiative to address depression. [2016]

6. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Evaluation of community-based health promotion interventions in children and adolescents in high-income countries: a scoping review on strategies and methods used. [2023]

7. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results? [2019]

8. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Public health impact of community-based nutrition and lifestyle interventions. [2019]

9. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A community education monitoring system: methods from the Stanford Five-City Project, the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Pawtucket Heart Health Program. [2019]

10. Switzerland pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

eB4CAST: An Evidence-Based Tool to Promote Dissemination and Implementation in Community-Based, Public Health Research. [2023]

11. Netherlands pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Effectiveness of community-based depression intervention programme (ComDIP) to manage women with depression in primary care- randomised control trial. [2019]

12. China pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

[Effect of community rehabilitation skill on patients with depression]. [2021]

13. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Physical fitness exercise versus cognitive behavior therapy on reducing the depressive symptoms among community-dwelling elderly adults: A randomized controlled trial. [2018]

14. Netherlands pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Recommendations for treating depression in community-based older adults. [2018]

15. United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

The Building Wellness project: a case history of partnership, power sharing, and compromise. [2021]