~200 spots leftby May 2027

Taking Action Program for Serious Mental Illnesses

Recruiting in Palo Alto (17 mi)
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Travel: May Be Covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Academic
Recruiting
Sponsor: Temple University
Disqualifiers: Graduating soon, Unable to consent
No Placebo Group

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The goal of this research is to investigate whether a peer-delivered illness self-management program called Taking Action can help college students with serious mental illnesses. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental condition (Taking Action) or the control condition (information only). Participants in the experimental condition will attend five 2.5-hour Taking Action sessions. Participants will complete three interviews (baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up) to assess how well the program works, is liked, and benefits students clinically and academically. The investigators seek to test the following hypotheses: Compared to controls, students who do the Taking Action program will report greater improvements in mental health self-management attitudes, skills, and behaviors and will report greater improvements in mental health symptoms and recovery, and better academic outcomes.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It seems focused on a self-management program rather than medication changes.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Taking Action Program for Serious Mental Illnesses?

The research suggests that patient-centered approaches, which include simplifying medication regimens and using shared decision-making, can improve outcomes for people with schizophrenia. These strategies, along with psychosocial interventions, are part of effective treatments for serious mental illnesses.12345

How is the Taking Action Program treatment different from other treatments for serious mental illnesses?

The Taking Action Program is unique because it focuses on integrating mental health care with general medical care, addressing both psychiatric and physical health needs, which is often overlooked in traditional treatments for serious mental illnesses.678910

Research Team

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for college students who have serious mental illnesses such as Bipolar Disorder, Depression, or Schizophrenia. Participants should be willing to attend sessions and complete interviews. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria details are not provided.

Inclusion Criteria

Experiencing a serious mental illness, as operationalized by either: a score of 13 or higher on the K-6 Screening Scale for serious mental illness, self-reported psychiatric diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum or major affective disorder and self-reported lifetime functional impairment due to experiencing mental health challenges
Have consistent access to a computer or smartphone and the Internet for communications
Currently enrolled in a 2- or 4-year postsecondary educational institution in the United States (and are able to present a valid student ID card)
See 2 more

Exclusion Criteria

I am unable to understand or sign the consent form.
Expected to graduate or complete their program within 2 semesters

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants in the experimental condition attend five 2.5-hour Taking Action sessions delivered online via videoconferencing

5 weeks
5 sessions (virtual)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

3 months
1 visit (virtual)

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Taking Action (Behavioral Intervention)
Trial OverviewThe study tests 'Taking Action,' a peer-delivered self-management program. Students will either join this program or receive only information (control group). The effectiveness of the program on mental health and academic performance will be evaluated through interviews.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Taking Action Intervention ConditionExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Participants in the experimental condition will participate in the Taking Action intervention.
Group II: Information Only Control ConditionActive Control1 Intervention
Participants in the information only control condition will not participate in any intervention but will be given access to a resource entitled, "A Practical Guide for People with Disabilities Who Want to Go to College".

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Temple University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
321
Recruited
89,100+
Dr. Kumar Budur profile image

Dr. Kumar Budur

Temple University

Chief Medical Officer

MD, MS

Dr. Jeffrey M. Dayno profile image

Dr. Jeffrey M. Dayno

Temple University

Chief Executive Officer

MD from Temple University School of Medicine

National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research

Collaborator

Trials
83
Recruited
10,500+

Dr. Kristi Hill

National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research

Acting Director since 2012

PhD in Neuroscience from the Medical College of Virginia

Dr. Phillip Beatty

National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research

Director of the Office of Research Sciences since 2019

PhD in Rehabilitation Sciences

Findings from Research

New antipsychotic medications offer hope for improved outcomes in individuals with schizophrenia, focusing on recovery rather than just maintenance of symptoms.
The article presents a framework for understanding the diverse outcomes of long-term psychosis treatment, which can help in creating more effective treatment programs.
Developing an outcomes-oriented approach for the treatment of schizophrenia.Lehman, AF.[2019]
In a study involving 38 patients with schizophrenia, overall physical health was identified as the most important outcome domain for patients to communicate with their mental health providers.
This preference for prioritizing physical health was consistent across various factors, including symptom severity and age, suggesting that treatment interventions should address physical health alongside mental health concerns.
Ranking of outcome domains for use in real-time outcomes feedback laboratory by patients with schizophrenia.Pyne, JM., Labbate, C.[2022]
A study evaluating the definitions of 'serious/severe mental illness' (SMI) across the U.S. found that 82.2% of locations had available policy definitions, highlighting a significant focus on this issue in mental health initiatives.
There is considerable variability in how SMI is defined, with most locations emphasizing functional impairment as a criterion, but only a small percentage linking these definitions to eligibility for specific mental health services, which could affect access to care.
Policy Definitions for "Serious Mental Illness" Across 56 United States, Districts and Territories.Gonzales, L., Kanani, A., Pereyra, A.[2023]

References

Patient-Centered Treatment Strategies to Improve Outcomes in Schizophrenia. [2021]
Developing an outcomes-oriented approach for the treatment of schizophrenia. [2019]
Evidence-based treatment of schizophrenia. [2019]
Ranking of outcome domains for use in real-time outcomes feedback laboratory by patients with schizophrenia. [2022]
Performance in Practice: Practice Assessment Tool for the Care of Patients With Schizophrenia. [2023]
Policy Definitions for "Serious Mental Illness" Across 56 United States, Districts and Territories. [2023]
Multiple risk-behavior profiles of smokers with serious mental illness and motivation for change. [2021]
Financial incentives and accountability for integrated medical care in Department of Veterans Affairs mental health programs. [2017]
Refining a taxonomy of goals planned between mental health consumers and community pharmacists. [2023]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Creating a health care team to manage chronic medical illnesses in patients with severe mental illness: the public policy perspective. [2018]