~45 spots leftby Dec 2025

FB825 for Eczema

Recruiting in Palo Alto (17 mi)
+9 other locations
Overseen byChia-Yu Chu
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Travel: May Be Covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Phase 2
Recruiting
Sponsor: Oneness Biotech Co., Ltd.
Must be taking: Emollients
Must not be taking: Systemic corticosteroids, JAK inhibitors
Disqualifiers: HIV, Hepatitis B/C, Drug abuse, others
Prior Safety Data
Approved in 2 Jurisdictions

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This is a randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and Safety of repeat subcutaneous doses of FB825 in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial requires that you stop taking certain medications before starting, such as systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, and other immunosuppressants, at least 4 weeks prior. You can continue using stable doses of non-sedative antihistamines.

What data supports the effectiveness of the drug FB825 for eczema?

While there is no direct data on FB825, other monoclonal antibodies like omalizumab have shown some effectiveness in treating atopic dermatitis (eczema), with 74.1% of patients experiencing a beneficial effect. This suggests that monoclonal antibodies can be effective for eczema, which may imply potential for FB825.12345

Is FB825 safe for human use?

Monoclonal antibodies, like FB825, are generally considered well tolerated and relatively safe in humans, though they can cause some allergic reactions such as urticaria (hives) and other rare, serious side effects. It's important to monitor for any hypersensitive reactions during treatment.12678

How does the drug FB825 for eczema differ from other treatments?

FB825 is a monoclonal antibody treatment that targets specific immune pathways involved in eczema, potentially offering a novel approach compared to existing treatments like corticosteroids or other monoclonal antibodies that target different immune components.2891011

Eligibility Criteria

Adults aged 18-65 with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, who haven't responded well to topical treatments, can join this trial. They should have a history of the condition for at least 12 months and meet specific severity scores (EASI ≥16 and vIGA-AD ≥3). Participants must also have a significant area affected by eczema (>10% BSA) and experience intense itching.

Inclusion Criteria

I am between 18 and 65 years old.
My skin condition didn't improve after using strong skin creams for 4 weeks.
I weigh at least 40 Kg.
See 7 more

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive 5 subcutaneous doses of FB825 or placebo over 12 weeks

12 weeks

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

12 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • FB825 (Monoclonal Antibodies)
Trial OverviewThe study is testing FB825, a new medication given as repeat subcutaneous injections, against a placebo. The goal is to see if FB825 is effective in reducing symptoms of atopic dermatitis. This process involves randomly assigning participants to either the treatment or placebo group without them knowing which one they're receiving.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Placebo Group
Group I: FB825Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: PlaceboPlacebo Group2 Interventions

FB825 is already approved in United States, China for the following indications:

🇺🇸 Approved in United States as FB825 for:
  • Atopic Dermatitis
🇨🇳 Approved in China as FB825 for:
  • Allergic Asthma

Find a Clinic Near You

Research Locations NearbySelect from list below to view details:
Center for Dermatology Clinical Research, Inc.Fremont, CA
Loading ...

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Oneness Biotech Co., Ltd.Lead Sponsor

References

Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study. [2022]Ustekinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against interleukin-12/23, may potentially be effective for severe atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment.
Safety, tolerability and efficacy of repeated intravenous infusions of KHK4083, a fully human anti-OX40 monoclonal antibody, in Japanese patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. [2021]KHK4083, a fully human anti-OX40 monoclonal antibody, is a potential novel therapeutic option for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD), targeting the immunopathogenic pathways.
Tezepelumab, an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: A randomized phase 2a clinical trial. [2022]Tezepelumab (AMG 157/MEDI9929), a first-in-class monoclonal antibody, targets thymic stromal lymphopoietin, a cytokine that is implicated in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD).
Omalizumab for atopic dermatitis: case series and a systematic review of the literature. [2022]Omalizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the high-affinity Fc receptor of IgE, registered for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria and severe allergic asthma. We present a case series of nine patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated off-label with omalizumab and a systematic review of the existing literature. Patients were selected consecutively from a tertiary dermatological referral center during a 5-year period. All patients were treated with omalizumab at a starting dose of 300 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks. Systematic literature searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify any study (case reports, case series, and controlled trials) evaluating the effect of treatment with omalizumab in AD. Based on physicians' assessment, 50% of our patients had a good or excellent response to treatment with omalizumab; a further 12.5% had a moderate response, while 37.5% experienced no response or deterioration of symptoms during treatment. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Twenty-six studies with a median of four patients each (range 1-21), comprising 174 patients, were included in the systematic review. Summed over all studies, a total of 129 patients (74.1%) experienced a beneficial effect of treatment ranging from little to complete response. Omalizumab appears to be a safe and well tolerated, however expensive, treatment with some clinical benefit in patients with severe recalcitrant AD. Recommendation for use in clinical practice awaits evidence from larger randomized controlled trials.
Monoclonal antibodies: the new magic bullets for allergy: IUPHAR Review 17. [2022]Allergic diseases and conditions are widespread and their incidence is on the increase. They are characterized by the activation of mast cells resident in tissues and the consequent infiltration and stimulation of several inflammatory cells, predominantly eosinophils. Cell-cell cross-talk and the release of mediators are responsible for the symptoms and for the modulation of the response. The gold standard of therapeutic intervention is still glucocorticosteroids, although they are not effective in all patients and may cause numerous side effects. Symptomatic medications are also widespread. As research has led to deeper insights into the mechanisms governing the diseases, new avenues have been opened resulting in recent years in the development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) such as anti-IgE mAbs (omalizumab) and others still undergoing clinical trials aimed to specifically target molecules involved in the migration and stimulation of inflammatory cells. In this review, we summarize new developments in the field of anti-allergic mAbs with special emphasis on the treatment of asthma, particularly severe forms of this condition, and atopic dermatitis, which are two unmet clinical needs.
Adverse Events for Monoclonal Antibodies in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. [2023](1) Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common disease in otolaryngology and novel biological therapies are required for clinical needs. To assess the tolerability of monoclonal antibodies, justifying their clinical applications, we presented a comprehensive safety profile of biologics in AR; (2) Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines for randomized clinical trials comparing monoclonal antibodies and placebo in AR. PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane were searched up until 9 January 2023. Among 3590 records in total, 12 studies with more than 2600 patients were included. Quality was assessed for all studies using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, and subgrouped meta-analysis was performed; (3) Results: We accomplished an up-to-date literature overview and analysis on adverse events of monoclonal antibodies in AR. Total, common, severe, discontinuation-causing, and serious adverse events failed to reach statistical significance. Country was an essential factor for heterogeneity, and urticaria was the adverse event at highest risk (RR 2.81, 95% CI 0.79-9.95); (4) Conclusions: Monoclonal antibodies are considered well tolerated and relatively safe in patients with AR. The regions of patients and hypersensitive adverse reactions such as urticaria require a special caution in biological treatments in AR.
Immune- and Non-Immune-Mediated Adverse Effects of Monoclonal Antibody Therapy: A Survey of 110 Approved Antibodies. [2022]Identification of new disease-associated biomarkers; specific targeting of such markers by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs); and application of advances in recombinant technology, including the production of humanized and fully human antibodies, has enabled many improved treatment outcomes and successful new biological treatments of some diseases previously neglected or with poor prognoses. Of the 110 mAbs preparations currently approved by the FDA and/or EMA, 46 (including 13 antibody-drug conjugates) recognizing 29 different targets are indicated for the treatment of cancers, and 66, recognizing 48 different targets, are indicated for non-cancer disorders. Despite their specific targeting with the expected accompanying reduced collateral damage for normal healthy non-involved cells, mAbs, may cause types I (anaphylaxis, urticaria), II (e.g., hemolytic anemia, possibly early-onset neutropenia), III (serum sickness, pneumonitis), and IV (Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis) hypersensitivities as well as other cutaneous, pulmonary, cardiac, and liver adverse events. MAbs can provoke severe infusion reactions that resemble anaphylaxis and induce a number of systemic, potentially life-threatening syndromes with low frequency. A common feature of most of these syndromes is the release of a cascade of cytokines associated with inflammatory and immunological processes. Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted antibodies may provoke papulopustular and mucocutaneous eruptions that are not immune-mediated.
REGN1908-1909 monoclonal antibodies block Fel d 1 in cat allergic subjects: Translational pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. [2022]REGN1908-1909, a 1:1 cocktail of two fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), REGN1908 and REGN1909, is being evaluated for treatment of cat allergy. Both REGN1908 and REGN1909 bind to the dominant cat allergen, Fel d 1. Adults with cat allergy confirmed by skin prick test (SPT) were randomized to single subcutaneous administration of placebo (n = 6) or REGN1908-1909 at doses of 150 (n = 6), 300 (n = 6), or 600 mg (n = 6). Blood samples were taken at prespecified time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis and exploratory evaluation of biomarkers (IgE and SPT). Safety was assessed. Drug concentration-time profiles in serum for ascending doses of REGN1908-1909 were consistent with linear PKs. Noncompartmental analysis showed that maximum concentration (Cmax ) and exposure increased proportionately with dose, with similar time to maximum concentration (Tmax ) for REGN1908 and REGN1909 (6.2 to 8.2 days across doses), and a longer terminal half-life for REGN1908 (~ 30 days) relative to REGN1909 (~ 21 days). Adverse events were not dose dependent; there were no dose-limiting toxicities. REGN1908-1909 is characterized by linear and dose-proportional kinetics of the two individual mAb components. A single 600 mg dose maintains total mAb mean concentrations in serum above the target (mean of ~ 10 mg/L) for 8-12 weeks. Maintaining this mean target concentration resulted in translational pharmacodynamic effects: maximal mast cell degranulation in a passive cutaneous anaphylaxis mouse model, and maintenance of clinical efficacy measured by Total Nasal Symptom Score in a previous proof-of-mechanism study.
Dupilumab pharmacokinetics in Chinese healthy subjects and patients with atopic dermatitis: Results of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. [2022]Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting IL-4Rα, has demonstrated rapid and sustained improvements in clinical outcomes in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
Tralokinumab plus topical corticosteroids for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from the double-blind, randomized, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase III ECZTRA 3 trial. [2021]Tralokinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically neutralizes interleukin-13, a key driver of atopic dermatitis (AD).
11.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Inhibitory effects of an anti-IgE antibody E25 on allergen-induced early asthmatic response. [2015]Inhaled allergens, acting through IgE-dependent mechanisms, are important triggers of asthma symptoms and inducers of airway hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation. The effect of anti-IgE recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody-E25 (rhuMAb-E25) on the provocation concentration of allergen causing a 15% fall in FEV1 (allergen PC15) during the allergen-induced early asthmatic response (EAR) was assessed in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. Ten of 11 allergic asthmatic subjects randomized to receive intravenous rhuMAb-E25, 2 mg/kg on study day 0 and 1 mg/kg on Days 7, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70 completed the study; nine received intravenous placebo. The allergen PC15 was measured on Days -1, 27, 55, and 77 and methacholine PC20 on Days -2, 42, and 76. rhuMAb-25 was well tolerated and only one patient (active group) was withdrawn because of a generalized urticarial rash after the first dose. Compared with baseline values (Day -1), the median allergen PC15 on Days 27, 55, and 77 were increased by 2.3, 2.2, and 2.7 doubling doses (delta log PC15/0.3) respectively with rhuMAb-E25 and -0.3, +0.1, and -0.8 doubling doses with placebo (p