Depression Clinical Trials in Colorado Springs
View 11 new treatments for depression near you in Colorado Springs, CO. Every day, Power helps over 527 depression patients connect with leading medical research.Aticaprant for Depression
Janssen Clinic, Colorado Springs + 2 more
This trial is testing aticaprant to see if it can help adults with major depressive disorder and anhedonia who haven't responded well to other antidepressants. Aticaprant works by blocking certain receptors in the brain to potentially improve depressive symptoms.Show More
Verified
ALTO-300 for Depression
Alto Neuroscience Clinic, Colorado Springs + 3 more
This trial is testing ALTO-300, a new medication, to see if it can make antidepressants work better for patients who are already taking them.
Verified
Lumateperone for Pediatric Bipolar Depression
Intra-Cellular Therapies Clinic, Colorado Springs + 1 more
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in pediatric patients who are experiencing major depressive episodes (MDEs) associated with a primary diagnosis of bipolar I or bipolar II disorder as confirmed by Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL), according to criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM 5).Show More
NMRA 335140 for Depression
Neumora Clinic, Colorado Springs + 1 more
This trial is testing a new medication called NMRA 335140 to see if it can help people with Major Depressive Disorder feel less depressed. The study involves an initial evaluation and a treatment phase where participants will receive either the medication or an inactive substance. The medication likely works by changing brain chemicals that affect mood.Show More
Aticaprant for Depression
Janssen Clinic, Colorado Springs + 1 more
This trial is testing if adding aticaprant to current antidepressants is safe and well-tolerated in people with major depressive disorder. The goal is to see if it can help improve their treatment.Show More
No Placebo Trial
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of SP-624 in the Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder
Sirtsei Clinic, Colorado Springs + 1 more
This trial is testing a new treatment called SP-624 to see if it is safe and effective for adults with Major Depressive Disorder. It aims to help those who haven't found relief with usual treatments by adjusting brain chemicals related to mood.Show More
BHV-7000 for Depression
Biohaven Clinic, Colorado Springs + 1 more
This trial is testing a new medication called BHV-7000 to see if it helps people with severe depression and if it is safe.
BHV-7000 for Depression
Biohaven Clinic, Colorado Springs + 1 more
This trial is testing a new medication called BHV-7000 to see if it is safe and well-tolerated over several months in people with Major Depressive Disorder. The goal is to help those who suffer from severe depression by potentially offering a new treatment option.Show More
No Placebo Trial
Digital Therapy for Suicide Prevention
Research Clinic, Colorado Springs + 1 more
The primary aim of the project is to test the efficacy of BCBT delivered via a digital platform (i.e., smartphone) to Servicemembers with recent suicidal ideation and/or suicide attempts presenting to primary care clinics. Given existing challenges of scaling empirically-supported treatments/interventions for suicidality with fidelity, this project could lead to markedly expanded access to BCBT, along with improving our understanding about what intervention strategies are most effective and how they can be delivered with meaningful fidelity. Aviva, the digital version of BCBT, was developed for use with patients across the full spectrum of healthcare settings, including primary care. Aviva is not an emergency alert system, rather a digital platform for delivery of the full scope of BCBT treatment components. An open-label single group Phase I clinical trial has demonstrated the safety, tolerability, feasibility, fidelity, and potential efficacy of Aviva, with participants completing modules over 8 weeks, and follow-up assessments at weeks 1, 4, and 8. Subsequent refinements included the addition of technical features that would allow patients to revisit and/or repeat previously completed modules, along with integration of more characters for delivering video vignettes and greater opportunities for skills practice and treatment engagement. These modifications have further enhanced Aviva safety, tolerability, and fidelity, consistent with the original BCBT protocol. Not only is it hypothesized that Aviva will result in significantly larger reductions in severity of suicidal ideation than participants randomized to the control condition, but also that greater app engagement will be negatively correlated with severity of suicidal thinking. Moderators and mediators (i.e. suicidal beliefs, wish to live, impulsive decision-making) of intervention effects will also be examined. The study will be conducted at the primary care clinics at Fort Carson, with a goal of enrolling 720 patients across a two-year timeframe. Participants will be identified using each clinic's existing suicide risk assessment methods, including the PHQ-9 suicide risk item and a score of 1 or higher on the CSSRS Screener (Recent). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions, Aviva or control (i.e., development of a safety plan consistent with local procedures and policies, along with referral for standard mental health care and suicide risk management in accordance with local policies and procedures). In an effort to address potential performance bias specific to smartphone use, participants in the control condition will download the Suicide Safety Plan app to their smartphones. Those in the Aviva condition will also complete weekly check-ins with Project 2 research clinicians to review treatment adherence, identify and respond to any logistical/operational problems, and respond to any unexpected emergencies and/or participant safety concerns. Participants will have up to five data points: baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. All data available from all participants and all time points will be included in the analyses, consistent with the intent-to-treat principle. Across our two previous clinical trials and our in-progress RCT, attrition during the first 12 months postbaseline was \<30% and we anticipate similar rates in this trial.Show More
No Placebo Trial
Smart Bassinet for Postpartum Depression
Research Clinic, Colorado Springs + 1 more
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of a Smart Bassinet to prevent/mitigate postpartum mood disorders by augmenting maternal sleep and/or enhancing infant sleep. The investigators will conduct a 2-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare infant and maternal sleep of infants who use a smart bassinet (SB) or a standard commercially available bassinet (Halo Bassinest Swivel Sleeper 3.0) (usual/traditional care (TAU)). After confirmation of eligibility, participants (N = 342) will randomly be assigned to either the SB or TAU. The investigators hypothesize that use of the SB will be associated with better infant and maternal sleep over a 6-month period, and these mothers will report fewer depressive and anxiety symptoms across the postpartum. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer \[is/are\]: Aim 1: Determine the effect of the SB on infant sleep and maternal sleep. \[primary hypothesis or outcome measure 2\]? Aim 2: Determine the effect of the SB on maternal postpartum depressive symptoms and evaluate the model that the association between the SB and postpartum depressive symptoms is mediated by both infant and maternal sleep Aim 3: Compare trajectory of immune system function from late pregnancy through postpartum between PPD and non-PPD and between SB and TAU groups Exploratory Aim. Evaluate whether the elevated risk demonstrated by previously identified PPD epigenetic biomarkers at the TTC9B and HP1BP3 genes can be modified by using a SB. The investigators hypothesize that the elevated risk will be reduced in the SB condition compared to TAU. Military-affiliated pregnant women will be recruited from across the US via social media and advertising. Monthly online questionnaires will be completed by the mother. Objective sleep data will be collected monthly using an actigraph for 1-week from both mother and baby. Blood samples for assay of inflammatory markers will be collected at enrollment, 3- and 6- months postpartum.Show More
No Placebo Trial
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do depression clinical trials pay?
Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range. Further, most trials will cover the costs of an Uber to-and-from the clinic. Factors that can affect compensation include the phase of the trial, the length of the trial, the frequency of visits, and the specific condition being studied.
Do I need to be insured to participate in a medical study?
Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on Cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.
How do depression clinical trials work?
After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll typical be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and will receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across depression trials in Colorado Springs, 42% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or two. The average trial length in this city for depression patients is 6 Months.
What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?
The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in getting approval for a specific condition. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where effectiveness has typically only been shown in animals and non-human experiments. Phase 1 trials are the trials where we don't have safety data in humans. As a general rule, phase 3 trials are more promising than phase 2, and phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.
Why are others applying to these studies?
I have tried two other drugs that didn't have any positive affect on my mental health and am hoping that trying out this trial will help me find a solution.
M.A. Patient
Depression Patient
I've tried many anti-depressants in my 45 year struggle with Major Depression. I'm hoping this study is the 'game changer'
B.E. Patient
Late-Life Depression Patient
I've tried more then 5 drugs for depression and it's very depressing frustrating when they do not work, or even help nothing, I'm still looking for that one or 2 that will help
A.L. Patient
Major Depression Patient