~8 spots leftby Dec 2028

Intensity Modulated Total Marrow Irradiation + Fludarabine Phosphate + Melphalan for Hematologic Cancers

Recruiting in Palo Alto (17 mi)
Hongtao Liu | Department of Medicine ...
Overseen byHongtao Liu, MD, PhD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Travel: May Be Covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Phase 1
Recruiting
Sponsor: University of Chicago
Disqualifiers: HIV, Pregnancy, Hepatitis, Cirrhosis, others
No Placebo Group

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This phase I trial studies the side effects and the best dose of intensity modulated total marrow irradiation (IMTMI) when given together with fludarabine phosphate and melphalan in treating patients with cancers of the blood (hematologic) that have returned after a period of improvement (relapsed) undergoing a second donor stem cell transplant. IMTMI is a type of radiation therapy to the bone marrow that may be less toxic and may also reduce the chances of cancer to return. Giving fludarabine phosphate, melphalan, and IMTMI before a donor stem cell transplant may help stop the growth of cells in the bone marrow, including normal blood-forming cells (stem cells) and cancer cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. When the healthy stem cells from a donor are infused into the patient they may help the patient's bone marrow make stem cells, red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Intensity Modulated Total Marrow Irradiation + Fludarabine Phosphate + Melphalan for hematologic cancers?

Research shows that combining fludarabine and melphalan with total body or marrow irradiation can improve survival and disease control in patients with hematologic cancers. Specifically, a study found that a regimen including these components improved progression-free survival and overall survival compared to other regimens, indicating its potential effectiveness.12345

Is the combination of Intensity Modulated Total Marrow Irradiation, Fludarabine, and Melphalan safe for humans?

The combination of Intensity Modulated Total Marrow Irradiation (IM-TMI), Fludarabine, and Melphalan has been studied in humans, showing that it is generally feasible and safe, though it can cause side effects like mucositis (painful inflammation and ulceration of the mucous membranes lining the digestive tract) and, in rare cases, severe heart problems. The most common serious side effect was mucositis, and some patients experienced heart issues, so careful monitoring is important.12367

How is the treatment of Intensity Modulated Total Marrow Irradiation with Fludarabine Phosphate and Melphalan different from other treatments for hematologic cancers?

This treatment is unique because it combines intensity-modulated total marrow irradiation (IM-TMI) with the drugs fludarabine and melphalan, specifically for patients undergoing a second or greater allogeneic stem cell transplant. This approach aims to improve disease control while managing toxicity, offering a tailored conditioning regimen that may be more effective for certain patients compared to standard reduced-intensity conditioning regimens.12358

Research Team

Hongtao Liu | Department of Medicine ...

Hongtao Liu, MD, PhD

Principal Investigator

University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for patients with relapsed blood cancers like AML or high-risk MDS, who are undergoing a second stem cell transplant. They should have good kidney and liver function, not be pregnant, HIV-negative, and have a Karnofsky performance status of 70+. The donor can be the same as the first transplant or a different matched donor.

Inclusion Criteria

Life expectancy is not severely limited by concomitant illness
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative
I have AML or high-risk MDS and am undergoing a second stem cell transplant for relapse, or I have another blood cancer as decided by my doctors.
See 9 more

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Conditioning Regimen

Participants receive fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes daily on days -7 to -3 and melphalan IV on day -2. They also undergo IMTMI twice daily for 2 to 5 days between days -7 to -3.

1 week

Transplant

Participants undergo allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) or bone marrow transplant (BMT) on day 0.

1 day

GVHD Prophylaxis

Participants receive tacrolimus IV continuously over 24 hours or orally BID on days -2 to 180 with taper thereafter and mycophenolate mofetil IV every 8 hours or PO on days 0-28 (for matched donors) or days 0-40 (for alternative donors) with taper to day 60.

6 months

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

3 years

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Fludarabine Phosphate (Anti-metabolites)
  • Intensity Modulated Total Marrow Irradiation (Radiation Therapy)
  • Melphalan (Alkylating agents)
Trial OverviewThe trial tests intensity modulated total marrow irradiation (IMTMI) combined with fludarabine phosphate and melphalan before a second stem cell transplant. It aims to see how well this approach works in stopping cancer growth and preventing immune rejection of the new stem cells.
Participant Groups
1Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Treatment (IMTMI, combination chemotherapy, PBSCT or BMT)Experimental Treatment10 Interventions
CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes daily on days -7 to -3 and melphalan IV on day -2. Patients also undergo IMTMI BID for 2 to 5 days between days -7 to -3. TRANSPLANT: Patients undergo allogeneic PBSCT or BMT on day 0. GVHD PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive tacrolimus IV continuously over 24 hours or PO BID on days -2 to 180 with taper thereafter and mycophenolate mofetil IV every 8 hours or PO on days 0-28 (for matched donors) or days 0-40 (for alternative donors) with taper to day 60.

Fludarabine Phosphate is already approved in United States, European Union, Canada, Japan for the following indications:

🇺🇸 Approved in United States as Fludara for:
  • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
  • Acute myeloid leukemia
🇪🇺 Approved in European Union as Fludara for:
  • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
  • Acute myeloid leukemia
🇨🇦 Approved in Canada as Fludara for:
  • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
  • Acute myeloid leukemia
🇯🇵 Approved in Japan as Fludara for:
  • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
  • Acute myeloid leukemia

Find a Clinic Near You

Research Locations NearbySelect from list below to view details:
University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer CenterChicago, IL
Loading ...

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Chicago

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1086
Patients Recruited
844,000+

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator

Trials
14080
Patients Recruited
41,180,000+

References

153Sm-EDTMP and melphalan chemoradiotherapy regimen for bone marrow ablation prior to marrow transplantation: an experimental model in the rat. [2019]Chemoradiotherapy with melphalan and 153Sm-ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonate (EDTMP) was used to ablate bone marrow in WAG rats which were subsequently rescued by marrow transplantation. Internal irradiation of bone marrow with high doses of up to 3.5 GBq kg-1 153Sm-EDTMP alone produced profound, but self-limiting, myelosuppression and all animals recovered spontaneously. Melphalan alone in doses of 9.5 mg kg-1 also caused transient myelosuppression without mortality. However, the combination of 9.5 mg kg-1 melphalan and 555 MBq kg-1 153Sm-EDTMP caused marrow ablation and death in 80% of animals. The mortality of this chemoradiotherapy regimen was reduced to 7% by sequential administration of 153Sm-EDTMP on day 0 and melphalan on day 5 followed by marrow transfusion of 7.5 x 10(7) cells on day 6. These results were comparable to those obtained following bone marrow transplantation 24 h after lethal total body external beam irradiation. In the inbred WAG rat experimental model the sequential chemoradiotherapeutic regimen of internal irradiation with 153Sm-EDTMP followed by chemotherapy with melphalan was demonstrated to ablate bone marrow effectively whilst preserving the capacity for recovery following marrow transplantation.
A phase 1 trial utilizing TMI with fludarabine-melphalan in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing second allo-SCT. [2023]Relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) remains the primary cause of treatment failure. A second SCT can result in long-term survival in a subset of patients, but the relapse rate remains high. We conducted a single-center, phase 1, modified 3 + 3 dose-escalation study of the feasibility of combining intensity-modulated total marrow irradiation (IM-TMI) with fludarabine and melphalan for conditioning. Between December 2015 and May 2020, 21 patients with relapsed hematologic disease undergoing second or greater allo-SCT were treated with IM-TMI doses of 6 Gy, 9 Gy, or 12 Gy. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as a grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event; mucositis was the primary dose-limiting toxicity. The median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 10 and 18 days, respectively. The 1-year cumulative incidence of graft-versus-host disease was 65% (95% confidence interval CI, 38-83). The nonrelapse mortality at 2 years was 17% (95% CI, 4-39). Cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 35% (95% CI, 13-58). Two-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 48% and 50%. We conclude that combining IM-TMI with fludarabine-melphalan is feasible. We recommend 12 Gy of IM-TMI with fludarabine-melphalan for second SCT, although 9 Gy may be used for older or underweight patients.
Total Marrow Lymphoid Irradiation/Fludarabine/ Melphalan Conditioning for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. [2019]Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) can reduce morbidity and mortality, but patients with advanced disease may require alternative approaches. In an initial report of RIC with fludarabine (FLU) and melphalan (MEL) with total marrow lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) in HCT for advanced hematologic malignancies in 33 patients, we found that the addition of TMLI to RIC was feasible and safe. Here we report long-term outcomes for these patients. This prospective study included 61 patients treated with TMLI to a dose of 12 Gy (1.5 Gy twice daily for 4 days), FLU (25 mg/m2/day for 5 days), and MEL (140 mg/m2/day for 1 day). Overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were measured from the date of HCT. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients were categorized as low/intermediate or high/very high risk using the Disease Risk Index. The median follow-up was 7.4 years. The majority of patients had acute leukemia (72%); 49% had high/very high-risk disease. The median patient age was 55 years (range, 9-70 years). Two-year OS, EFS, CIR, and NRM were 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41%-66%), 49% (95% CI, 36%-61%), 21% (95% CI, 13%-35%), and 30% (95% CI, 20%-43%), respectively. Five-year OS, EFS, CIR, and NRM were 42% (95% CI, 30%-54%), 41% (95% CI, 28%-53%), 26 (95% CI, 17%-40%), and 33% (95% CI, 23%-47%, respectively). Acute (any grade) and chronic (limited or extensive) graft-versus-host disease occurred in 69% and 74% of patients, respectively. The most common toxicity was mucositis. The addition of TMLI to FLU/MEL conditioning was well tolerated, with favorable outcomes. Dosage escalation of TMLI or other modifications may be needed to improve disease control.
Comparable kinetics of myeloablation between fludarabine/full-dose busulfan and fludarabine/melphalan conditioning regimens in allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. [2013]Fludarabine was utilized in the conditioning regimen of 30 adult patients undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In 18 patients it was combined with full-dose busulfan (FluBu) as a myeloablative regimen and in 12 cases with melphalan (FluMel) as a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen. Patients in the FluBu group were younger than in the FluMel group (P=0.03). Of 30 patients, 24 received peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) whereas six patients in the FluBu group received bone marrow cells. The hematological toxicity of each regimen was evaluated by analyzing the kinetics of the neutropenia induced by preparative regimens and the time to recovery of the absolute neutrophils count (ANC) and platelets post transplantation. In PBSC transplants, the median day of severe neutropenia (
Reduced-Intensity Conditioning with Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Total Body Irradiation for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: The Effect of Increasing Melphalan Dose on Underlying Disease and Toxicity. [2022]Disease relapse and toxicity are the shortcomings of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). We hypothesized that adding total body irradiation (TBI) to and decreasing melphalan (Mel) from a base RIC regimen of fludarabine (Flu) and Mel would increase cytoreduction and improve disease control while decreasing toxicity. We performed a phase II trial of Flu 160 mg/m2, Mel 50 mg/m2, and TBI 400 cGy (FluMelTBI-50, n = 61), followed by a second phase II trial of Flu 160 mg/m2, Mel 75 mg/m2, and TBI 400cGy (FluMelTBI-75, n = 94) as RIC for alloHCT. Outcomes were compared with a contemporaneous cohort of 162 patients who received Flu 125 mg/m2 and Mel 140 mg/m2. Eligibility criteria were equivalent for all 3 regimens. All patients were ineligible for myeloablative/intensive conditioning. The median (range) follow-up for all patients was 51 (15 to 103) months. Day 100 donor lymphoid chimerism and transplant-related mortality, neutrophil and platelet engraftment, acute and chronic graft versus host disease incidence, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were equivalent between FluMel, FluMelTBI-50, and FluMelTBI-75. Stomatitis wasdecreased for FluMelTBI versus FluMel (P < .01). PFS for patients not in complete remission on alloHCT was improved for FluMelTBI-75 versus FluMel (P = .03). On multivariate analysis, OS (P = .05) and PFS (P = .05) were significantly improved for FluMelTBI-75 versus FluMel. FluMelTBI-75 is better tolerated than FluMel, with improved survival and disease control.
Acute left ventricular failure following melphalan and fludarabine conditioning. [2013]Cardiotoxicity has rarely been reported as a complication of melphalan or fludarabine administration as single agents. Recently, melphalan and fludarabine have been used in combination as non-myeloablative conditioning chemotherapy prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. We have observed the development of severe left ventricular failure in three of 21 patients treated with this combination. Cardiotoxicity in this context has not previously been reported and has implications for the assessment, monitoring and treatment of patients undergoing pre-transplant conditioning with melphalan and fludarabine.
Phase I clinical trials with fludarabine phosphate. [2013]There have been six different phase I trials of Fludara I.V. (fludarabine phosphate) in patients with solid tumors and three different phase I trials of Fludara I.V. in patients with acute leukemia. In addition, one trial of the agent given intraperitoneally has also been published. In patients with solid tumors, the two most often used schedules are a daily bolus schedule of 18 to 25 mg/m2/d for 5 days repeated every 28 days, and a 20 mg/m2 loading dose followed by a 48-hour continuous infusion of the agent at a dose of 25 to 30 mg/m2/d. The dose-limiting toxicity in these studies has been myelosuppression. No dosage or schedule could be recommended for patients with acute leukemia because of the severe neurotoxicity (progressive dementia with blindness leading to coma) noted with doses greater than or equal to 96 mg/m2/d for 5 to 7 days. Other toxicities noted in phase I trials have included somnolence, mild to moderate nausea and vomiting, and a rare and reversible interstitial pneumonitis. Of greatest interest is that a profound lymphopenia has been noted as a side effect of Fludara I.V. That toxicity has proven to be of benefit for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, low-grade lymphoma, and mycosis fungoides, all of which are responsive to Fludara I.V. therapy.
Outcomes of Fludarabine, Melphalan and Total Body Irradiation as a Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen in Matched Donor Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation. [2021]Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d × 5 and melphalan 140 mg/m2 × 1 (Flu-Mel140) is a commonly used reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. We hypothesized that addition of 200cGy total body irradiation (TBI) to Flu-Mel140 may improve antitumor activity and transplant outcomes. Primary objectives was overall survival (OS) at 3 years. Secondary objectives were to assess the cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse rate, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of patients receiving Flu-Mel140-TBI followed by HLA-matched donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) using peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-one patients (median age, 58 years) underwent alloSCT between January 2008 and December 2018. Thirty-one percent of patients had a prior transplant, 32% had high or very-high disease risk index, and the donor was unrelated in 70% of patients. Grade 3 to 4 regimen-related toxicities were mucositis (37%), cardiac toxicity (17%), and renal toxicity (10%). The cumulative incidence of grade III to IV acute GVHD at day +100 was 24.7% and chronic GVHD at 1 year was 51.3%. Median follow-up for survival was 6.1 years. At 3 years, OS was 39.81%, RFS was 31.47%, and relapse rate was 30.5%. One-year NRM was 29.9%. Patients undergoing first transplantation experienced improved OS compared with second or beyond (63.08% versus 42.31%, P = .02). After adjusting for disease subtypes, age (≤55 versus 55), comorbidity index (CI), number of transplant and GVHD prophylaxis, multivariable analysis did not demonstrate any survival difference among disease subtypes. High CI (≥3) was predictive of adverse OS and NRM, whereas older age (>55 years) was associated with high NRM. Our study shows that Flu-Mel140-TBI seems feasible and provides durable disease control. Addition of TBI did not appear to improve outcomes compared to previously published reports of Flu-Mel140. Considerable NRM could result from the inclusion of patients with older age and prior transplants.