Family Support Program for Critical Illness

Recruiting in Palo Alto (17 mi)

+2 other locations

Overseen by Wendy Lichtenthal, PhD

Age: 18+

Sex: Any

Travel: May Be Covered

Time Reimbursement: Varies

Trial Phase: Phase 2

Recruiting

Sponsor: Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Disqualifiers: Cognitive impairment, Suicidal ideation, others

Prior Safety Data

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests EMPOWER, a psychological therapy designed to help family members who make medical decisions for critically ill patients in ICUs. The therapy aims to reduce grief and stress by teaching coping strategies that help people accept and manage their emotions. Researchers hope this will improve mental health outcomes and decision-making abilities for these family members.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It seems focused on supporting decision-makers rather than changing medication regimens.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment EMPOWER for critical illness?

Research shows that the EMPOWER program, which is a cognitive-behavioral and acceptance-based treatment, helps improve mental health for those making medical decisions for critically ill patients. Similar programs, like COPE, have been effective in reducing stress and improving coping for parents of critically ill children, suggesting that EMPOWER may also be beneficial. ^{1 2 3 4 5}

Is the Family Support Program for Critical Illness safe for humans?

The EMPOWER intervention, which is part of the Family Support Program for Critical Illness, has been evaluated for its feasibility and acceptability, suggesting it is generally safe for surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients. ^{1 2 4 6 7}

How is the EMPOWER treatment different from other treatments for critical illness?

The EMPOWER treatment is unique because it is a cognitive-behavioral, acceptance-based intervention specifically designed for surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients in the ICU. It focuses on improving both the mental health of the surrogates and the quality of life for patients, which is not typically addressed by standard medical treatments for critical illness. ^{2 4 8 9 10}

Research Team

Wendy Lichtenthal, PhD

Principal Investigator

University of Miami

Holly Prigerson, PhD

Principal Investigator

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adult surrogate decision-makers of critically ill ICU patients near end-of-life. They must speak English, be able to use a device with internet, and live where the interventionist is licensed. Participants need to show significant pre-loss grief or distress but can't have cognitive impairments or recent suicidal ideation.

Inclusion Criteria

Surrogate decision-makers whom physicians or advance practice providers indicate as the designated health care proxy or decision-making patient surrogates, or who are listed as such in the patient's medical charts or by self-report of the surrogate

Surrogate decision-makers will need to be willing to utilize a device (computer, tablet, phone) with internet

My surrogate decision-maker speaks English.

Exclusion Criteria

Surrogate-decision makers who endorse suicidal ideation in the past month based on responses to the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale

Surrogate-decision makers who are unable to access a functional device for videoconferencing and decline the offer to use a study loner device

Patients and surrogate decision-makers who do not meet the eligibility criteria

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Intervention

Participants receive the EMPOWER intervention or Supportive Conversation over a period of 3 months

3 months

Up to 4 visits (in-person and by phone)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for changes in symptoms of PTSD, PGD, and other outcomes

12 months

Assessments at 3 months and 12 months post-intervention

Treatment Details

Interventions

• EMPOWER (Behavioral Intervention)
• Supportive Conversation (Other)

Trial Overview The study tests if the EMPOWER program better reduces symptoms of grief and PTSD in surrogates compared to just having supportive conversations. It also looks at depression, regrets, and how well patient care matches their values over time.

Participant Groups

Group I: EMPOWER arm Experimental Treatment 1 Intervention

The EMPOWER arm includes six 15 minute modules delivered in a 1-on-1 format with the same interventionist, and 2 boosters (approximately 45 minutes each) conducted by phone. Subjects who meet eligibility criteria will receive up to 4 sequential assessments before and after the EMPOWER intervention within 3 months conducted in person and by phone.

Group II: Supportive Conversation arm Placebo Group 1 Intervention

The Supportive Conversation (SC) arm includes a supportive, empathic encounter without specific skill-building for approximately the same amount of time as EMPOWER. Subjects who meet eligibility criteria will receive up to 4 sequential assessments before and after SC within 3 months conducted in person and by phone.

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Lead Sponsor

Trials

1,103

Recruited

1,157,000+

Dr. Robert Min

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Chief Executive Officer since 2024

MD, MBA

Dr. Adam R. Stracher

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Chief Medical Officer since 2024

MD

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Collaborator

Trials

2,896

Recruited

8,053,000+

Dr. Jeanne Marrazzo

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Chief Medical Officer

MD from University of California, Los Angeles

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Chief Executive Officer

MD, PhD from Stanford University

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Collaborator

Trials

623

Recruited

10,400,000+

Dr. Jessica Gill

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Chief Medical Officer since 2023

PhD in Nursing from Johns Hopkins University

Dr. Shannon Zenk

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Chief Executive Officer since 2020

PhD in Urban Planning and Policy Development from Rutgers University

Findings from Research

The COPE program, an educational-behavioral intervention for mothers of critically ill children, significantly reduced parental stress and improved participation in their children's care, leading to better emotional outcomes for both mothers and children.

Children whose mothers participated in the COPE program exhibited fewer behavioral problems and adjustment issues up to 12 months after discharge compared to those in the control group, suggesting that early intervention can help mitigate long-term mental health risks.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Creating opportunities for parent empowerment: program effects on the mental health/coping outcomes of critically ill young children and their mothers. Melnyk, BM., Alpert-Gillis, L., Feinstein, NF., et al.[2022]

The COPE program significantly improved mothers' ability to support their critically ill children during medical procedures, leading to better emotional support and reduced parental stress.

Mothers who participated in the COPE program reported fewer post-traumatic stress symptoms and less change in their parental roles four weeks after their child's hospitalization, highlighting the program's effectiveness in helping families cope with the stress of critical illness.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Helping mothers cope with a critically ill child: a pilot test of the COPE intervention. Melnyk, BM., Alpert-Gillis, LJ., Hensel, PB., et al.[2019]

The EMPOWER intervention, a cognitive-behavioral and acceptance-based program, aims to improve mental health outcomes for surrogate decision-makers in the ICU, addressing their peritraumatic stress and potentially enhancing the quality of life for patients.

The study will evaluate the effectiveness of EMPOWER through a randomized controlled trial involving 60 participants, assessing its impact on mental health symptoms and patient care outcomes, with feedback from clinicians and caregivers used to refine the intervention.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Enhancing & Mobilizing the POtential for Wellness & Emotional Resilience (EMPOWER) among Surrogate Decision-Makers of ICU Patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Prigerson, HG., Viola, M., Brewin, CR., et al.[2021]

A study involving 35 survivors of critical illness and their relatives revealed that current hospital discharge practices often prioritize speed over individual needs, which can hinder a positive transition experience.

Key barriers identified include feelings of being overlooked and disqualified, while enablers for a smoother transition included empowerment, support from empathetic professionals, and family engagement, highlighting the need for more personalized discharge planning.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Survivors of Critical Illness and Their Relatives. A Qualitative Study on Hospital Discharge Experience. Major, ME., van Nes, F., Ramaekers, S., et al.[2020]

A 30-day multicomponent intervention for critical illness survivors significantly reduced rehospitalization and mortality rates over 12 months compared to usual care, highlighting the importance of structured recovery support.

Integrating health and social care for critical care survivors improved health-related quality of life and self-efficacy at 12 months, suggesting that comprehensive support systems are beneficial for recovery.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Healthcare delivery and recovery after critical illness. Hope, AA., McPeake, J.[2023]

A study involving 38 family members of critically ill patients compared two types of follow-up interventions, revealing that both interventions increased hope and improved health-related quality of life.

The family health conversation intervention, which included the patient, showed significantly better outcomes in family functioning and hope compared to the support group conversation that excluded the patient.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Family health conversations versus support group conversations when a family member has been critically ill: A mixed methods study. Ahlberg, M., Persson, C., Berterö, C., et al.[2021]

A study involving interviews with 29 relatives of ICU patients revealed that they find empowerment crucial for coping with the stress of having a loved one in critical care, emphasizing the need for both internal confidence and external support.

Relatives expressed that trust in themselves, encounters with kindness, and professional care are essential for feeling supported, highlighting the importance of healthcare professionals being sensitive to their needs and providing appropriate social support.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

What is supportive when an adult next-of-kin is in critical care? Johansson, I., Fridlund, B., Hildingh, C.[2022]

References

1. United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Creating opportunities for parent empowerment: program effects on the mental health/coping outcomes of critically ill young children and their mothers. [2022]

2. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Development and preliminary evaluation of EMPOWER for surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients. [2022]

3. United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Helping mothers cope with a critically ill child: a pilot test of the COPE intervention. [2019]

4. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Enhancing & Mobilizing the POtential for Wellness & Emotional Resilience (EMPOWER) among Surrogate Decision-Makers of ICU Patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. [2021]

5. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Nurses' Empowerment Scale for ICU patients' families: an instrument development study. [2019]

6. United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Survivors of Critical Illness and Their Relatives. A Qualitative Study on Hospital Discharge Experience. [2020]

7. United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Healthcare delivery and recovery after critical illness. [2023]

8. United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Family health conversations versus support group conversations when a family member has been critically ill: A mixed methods study. [2021]

9. United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Optimizing Critical Illness Recovery: Perspectives and Solutions From the Caregivers of ICU Survivors. [2022]

10. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

What is supportive when an adult next-of-kin is in critical care? [2022]