Effectiveness of the NoseFrida Compared With Bulb Suction at Relieving Objective Signs of Nasal Obstruction and Reducing Return Visits in Pediatric Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department

Recruiting in Palo Alto (17 mi)

Age: < 18

Sex: Any

Travel: May Be Covered

Time Reimbursement: Varies

Trial Phase: Academic

Waitlist Available

Sponsor: Vanderbilt University Medical Center

No Placebo Group

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The mainstay of treatment in viral upper and lower respiratory tract disease is airway clearance. Viral respiratory tract infections account for a substantial amount of emergency department (ED) visits, financial and stress burden on caregivers. In addition, they also account for a large number of ED return visits. While airway clearance is considered a mainstay of treatment the pragmatic effectiveness of various devices remain unstudied in patients who are discharged from the ED. The objectives of this study are to compare the pragmatic effectiveness of two commonly used suction devices the NoseFrida and bulb suction and to provide a descriptive analysis on 72 hour return to ED rates and readmission rates. Patients will be enrolled October 15, 2018 to October 15, 2019 or until NoseFrida supplies are depleted. Fridababy will supply 500 NoseFrida devices and replacement filters. Patients aged 1 day to 24 months presenting Vanderbilt Childrens ED with symptoms of nasal congestion or bronchiolitis who require suctioning and will be discharged from the ED will be approached for enrollment. Exclusion criteria include no upper airway abnormalities or previously enrolled in study. The study design is a prospective and retrospective observational study. We anticipate about 500 patients to be enrolled in this study. Families will then be approached for consent to participate. Caregiver will fill out a data collection form then be instructed on how to use the NoseFrida. Next, family with trial it on their child while in the ED. Caregivers will then fill out a 7 point Likert survey on both the bulb suction and NoseFrida device. The family will go home with this device and a set of replacement filters and instructed to suction their child as needed. The primary investigator (PI) will then complete a 72 hour chart review to determine the number of return to ED visits and readmission rates. To compare ED returns with retrospective data, KSP will conduct a review of the business objects database using ICD9 codes specific for viral respiratory tract infections over the past 3 years to determine a control return ED visit rate. Data will be compared using a paired T-test. If data is not normally distributed we will use a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. We will also use a multivariable logistic model to examine associations adjusted for age and illness severity.

Research Team

Donald Arnold, M.D.

Principal Investigator

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Age 1 day-24 months presenting to the ED with a complaint of nasal congestion or symptoms of bronchiolitis who require suctioning.

Parent/guardian has used a bulb suction device in the past.

This is the first presentation to Vanderbilt Childrens Emergency Department for current illness.

See 2 more

Treatment Details

Interventions

Bulb suction (Behavioural Intervention)
NoseFrida (Behavioural Intervention)

Participant Groups

2Treatment groups

Experimental Treatment

Active Control

Group I: NoseFridaExperimental Treatment1 Intervention

Patients in this arm will be given the NoseFrida to treat nasal congestion. This group will contain participants who will trial the NoseFrida in the emergency department.

Group II: Bulb suctionActive Control1 Intervention

Patients in this arm will be given bulb suction to treat nasal congestion. This group will contain participants who have used bulb suction in the past.