~40 spots leftby Feb 2026

Relapse Prevention for Alcoholism

(ARCH-RPA Trial)

Recruiting in Palo Alto (17 mi)
HH
Overseen byHeidi Hutton, PhD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Travel: May Be Covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Academic
Recruiting
Sponsor: Johns Hopkins University
Disqualifiers: Suicidal, Homicidal, Psychotic, others
No Placebo Group
Approved in 1 Jurisdiction

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

3-arm type 1 pilot implementation-efficacy trial for people with alcohol use disorders to examine the preliminary effectiveness and feasibility of an adapted 2-session, computerized and person delivered relapse prevention intervention.

Do I have to stop taking my current medications for the trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Relapse Prevention Intervention for alcoholism?

Research shows that relapse prevention, especially when combined with cognitive-behavioral approaches, is generally effective for alcohol problems. Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention (MBRP) has also shown promise, with participants experiencing lower rates of substance use and reduced cravings compared to standard treatments.12345

Is relapse prevention therapy safe for humans?

Relapse prevention therapies, including mindfulness-based and cognitive-behavioral approaches, are generally considered safe for humans, as they focus on teaching skills to manage triggers and cravings without involving medication.35678

How is Relapse Prevention Intervention different from other treatments for alcoholism?

Relapse Prevention Intervention is unique because it combines cognitive-behavioral strategies with mindfulness techniques to help individuals recognize and cope with triggers that may lead to relapse, focusing on both mental and emotional aspects of addiction.367910

Research Team

HH

Heidi Hutton, PhD

Principal Investigator

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults over 18 with HIV who are patients at Johns Hopkins HIV Clinic. They must have a history of alcohol use disorder, varying drinking patterns, and currently be abstinent or drinking minimally. Non-English speakers, those acutely suicidal or unable to consent are excluded.

Inclusion Criteria

Meet the following alcohol use criteria: lifetime alcohol use disorder, patient reported outcomes (PRO) assessment collected by the Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) Network of Clinical Systems as part of usual clinical care that show in the last 3 years: periods of no or lower risk drinking (e.g. women/men who are drinking <11/22 drinks per week) and periods of lapse to higher levels of drinking (=>11/22 drinks per week for women/men), current PRO showing alcohol abstinence or alcohol use at <11/22 drinks per week for women/men.
I have been diagnosed with HIV.
I am 18 years old or older.
See 1 more

Exclusion Criteria

I speak English.
Acutely suicidal, homicidal, psychotic or otherwise unable to provide informed consent

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Intervention

Participants receive a 2-session relapse prevention intervention, either computer or person delivered, or treatment as usual

2 sessions

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for changes in alcohol use patterns and time to relapse

12 months
Assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Relapse Prevention Intervention (Behavioral Intervention)
Trial OverviewThe study tests an adapted relapse prevention intervention for alcohol use disorders in people with HIV. It's a pilot trial comparing three groups: one gets computerized sessions, another person-delivered sessions, and the third group might receive usual care.
Participant Groups
3Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Person delivered RPIExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
2 session counselor delivered counseling to prevent relapse to hazardous drinking
Group II: Computer delivered RPIExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
2 session computer delivered counseling to prevent relapse to hazardous drinking
Group III: Treatment as UsualActive Control1 Intervention
Counseling for alcohol use available in clinic as treatment as usual

Find a Clinic Near You

Research Locations NearbySelect from list below to view details:
Johns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimore, MD
Loading ...

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Johns Hopkins University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
2366
Patients Recruited
15,160,000+

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

Collaborator

Trials
865
Patients Recruited
1,091,000+

Findings from Research

[Relapse prevention group for alcohol dependent patients].Johann, M., Bobbe, G., Franke, E., et al.[2018]
[Relapse Prevention Program in German Alcoholics]Johann, M., Bobbe, G., Franke, E., et al.[2019]
Efficacy of relapse prevention: a meta-analytic review.Irvin, JE., Bowers, CA., Dunn, ME., et al.[2019]
Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for substance use disorders: a pilot efficacy trial.Bowen, S., Chawla, N., Collins, SE., et al.[2022]
Relative efficacy of mindfulness-based relapse prevention, standard relapse prevention, and treatment as usual for substance use disorders: a randomized clinical trial.Bowen, S., Witkiewitz, K., Clifasefi, SL., et al.[2022]
Mindfulness-based relapse prevention (MBRP) was more effective than traditional relapse prevention (RP) in maintaining reductions in heavy drinking days (HDD) after treatment, with MBRP participants showing significantly less HDD at follow-up.
Cannabis use frequency influenced treatment outcomes, where higher cannabis use was linked to continued decreases in HDD and drinks per drinking day (DDD) for MBRP participants, while RP participants experienced increased HDD with high cannabis use.
Comparing the Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention Versus Relapse Prevention for Alcohol Use Disorder: A Randomized Control Trial.Skrzynski, CJ., Karoly, H., Ellingson, JM., et al.[2023]
In a study of 609 self-referred addicts in Bushehr province, 73.1% reported substance use in the past year, with 72% experiencing a full relapse, highlighting the significant challenge of relapse prevention.
The primary triggers for relapse were identified as unpleasant emotions and physical discomfort, suggesting that addressing these emotional and physical factors is crucial in developing effective treatment strategies.
High risk situations predicting relapse in self-referred addicts to bushehr province substance abuse treatment centers.Shafiei, E., Hoseini, AF., Bibak, A., et al.[2021]
[Mindfulness in addiction therapy].Nallet, A., Briefer, JF., Perret, I.[2015]
Relapse prevention for addictive behaviors.Hendershot, CS., Witkiewitz, K., George, WH., et al.[2023]
Exploratory findings from the Reasons for Drinking Questionnaire.Zywiak, WH., Westerberg, VS., Connors, GJ., et al.[2022]

References

[Relapse prevention group for alcohol dependent patients]. [2018]
[Relapse Prevention Program in German Alcoholics] [2019]
Efficacy of relapse prevention: a meta-analytic review. [2019]
Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for substance use disorders: a pilot efficacy trial. [2022]
Relative efficacy of mindfulness-based relapse prevention, standard relapse prevention, and treatment as usual for substance use disorders: a randomized clinical trial. [2022]
Comparing the Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention Versus Relapse Prevention for Alcohol Use Disorder: A Randomized Control Trial. [2023]
High risk situations predicting relapse in self-referred addicts to bushehr province substance abuse treatment centers. [2021]
[Mindfulness in addiction therapy]. [2015]
Relapse prevention for addictive behaviors. [2023]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Exploratory findings from the Reasons for Drinking Questionnaire. [2022]