~44 spots leftby Apr 2027

ESK981 for Cancer

Palo Alto (17 mi)
Vaibhav Sahai Profile | University of ...
Overseen byVaibhav Sahai, MBBS, MS
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Travel: May be covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Phase 2
Recruiting
Sponsor: University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?This protocol will enroll patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma (Cohort 1), gastrointestinal/pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with Ki-67 \> 20% (Cohort 2) and neuroendocrine prostate carcinoma (Cohort 3)). Each cohort will have its own interim analysis after enrollment of 10 patients. Subjects will be given a one-month (28 day) supply of study drug (ESK981). Subjects will be instructed to take 4 capsules, with or without food, once per day for 5 consecutive calendar days, then take a drug holiday for 2 consecutive days before repeating the 5 days on-2 days off cycle in sets of 4 weeks or 28 calendar days. Subjects will be asked to keep a pill diary noting the date they take their study drug.
Is the drug ESK981 a promising treatment for cancer?The drug ESK981 is considered promising for cancer treatment because it targets specific proteins involved in cancer cell survival and resistance to therapy. By interfering with these proteins, ESK981 may help improve the effectiveness of cancer treatments and potentially lead to better outcomes for patients.1231115
Do I have to stop taking my current medications for the trial?The trial protocol does not specify if you must stop taking your current medications. However, you cannot use a chronic daily medication that is a strong or moderate inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2C8, or CYP3A4.
What safety data is available for ESK981 in cancer treatment?The provided research does not contain any safety data for ESK981 or its other names (CEP-11981, BOL 303213X, BOL-303213X, BOL303213X, ESK 981, ESK-981). The studies focus on the efficacy and tolerability of different antiemetic treatments for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, but none mention ESK981 or its variants.45101213
What data supports the idea that ESK981 for Cancer is an effective drug?The available research does not provide any specific data or studies on the effectiveness of ESK981 for Cancer. The articles focus on other treatments and conditions, such as everolimus for breast cancer and Sur8 in colorectal cancer, but do not mention ESK981. Therefore, there is no direct evidence from the provided information to support the effectiveness of ESK981 for Cancer.678914

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults with certain advanced cancers, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma, gastrointestinal/pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with high Ki-67 levels, and neuroendocrine prostate carcinoma. Participants must have progressed beyond or be intolerant to standard treatments and meet specific criteria like having visceral metastases or a high volume of disease.

Inclusion Criteria

My advanced cancer type has been confirmed by lab tests.
I am able to care for myself and perform daily activities.
I am 18 years old or older.
I agree not to donate sperm during and for 6 months after treatment.
I can undergo CT or MRI scans with contrast without issues.

Exclusion Criteria

I have not had cancer before, except for certain types.
My blood pressure is controlled and below 150/90.
I have had a condition where my lymphocytes grow abnormally.
I have a history of cancer.
I am not on daily medication that strongly affects certain enzymes.
I do not have ongoing severe diarrhea.

Treatment Details

The study tests ESK981 in patients across three cohorts based on their cancer type. Patients take the drug orally for five days followed by a two-day break, repeating this cycle every four weeks while keeping track of their medication intake in a diary.
3Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Cohort 3Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
Neuroendocrine prostate carcinoma with Ki-67 \> 20%
Group II: Cohort 2Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
Pancreatic or gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms with Ki-67 \> 20%
Group III: Cohort 1Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Find a clinic near you

Research locations nearbySelect from list below to view details:
Rogel Cancer CenterAnn Arbor, MI
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroit, MI
University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer CenterMadison, WI
Loading ...

Who is running the clinical trial?

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterLead Sponsor

References

ZD1839 ('Iressa') as an anticancer agent. [2018]ZD1839 ('Iressa') is an orally active, selective epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor which blocks signal transduction pathways implicated in the proliferation and survival of cancer cells and other host-dependent processes promoting cancer growth. In preclinical studies, ZD1839 produced reversible growth inhibition and growth delay in a wide range of tumour cell lines and human tumour xenografts. Moreover, this activity was enhanced when ZD1839 was coadministered with cytotoxic agents. Preliminary results from phase I trials in patients with advanced disease and a wide variety of tumour types suggest that ZD1839 has an acceptable tolerability profile and promising clinical efficacy, particularly in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ZD1839 is currently in phase III clinical development for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. In addition, further trials are ongoing or planned in a number of other tumour types.
Modulation of tumor growth and tumor induced angiogenesis after epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition by ZD1839 in renal cell carcinoma. [2018]ZD1839 or Iressa (AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom) is an orally active, selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. We evaluated the antitumor activity of ZD1839 in human renal cell carcinomas (RCC).
Simultaneous exposure of transformed cells to SRC family inhibitors and CHK1 inhibitors causes cell death. [2021]The present studies were initiated to determine in greater molecular detail the regulation of CHK1 inhibitor lethality in transfected and infected breast cancer cells and using genetic models of transformed fibrobalsts. Multiple MEK1/2 inhibitors (PD184352, AZD6244 (ARRY-142886)) interacted with multiple CHK1 inhibitors (UCN-01 (7-hydroxystaurosporine), AZD7762) to kill mammary carcinoma cells and transformed fibroblasts. In transformed cells, CHK1 inhibitor -induced activation of ERK1/2 was dependent upon activation of SRC family non-receptor tyrosine kinases as judged by use of multiple SRC kinase inhibitors (PP2, Dasatinib; AZD0530), use of SRC/FYN/YES deleted transformed fibroblasts or by expression of dominant negative SRC. Cell killing by SRC family kinase inhibitors and CHK1 inhibitors was abolished in BAX/BAK -/- transformed fibroblasts and suppressed by over expression of BCL-XL. Treatment of cells with BCL-2/BCL-XL antagonists promoted SRC inhibitor + CHK1 inhibitor -induced lethality in a BAX/BAK-dependent fashion. Treatment of cells with [SRC + CHK1] inhibitors radio-sensitized tumor cells. These findings argue that multiple inhibitors of the SRC-RAS-MEK pathway interact with multiple CHK1 inhibitors to kill transformed cells.
Single-dose palonosetron and dexamethasone in preventing nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in breast and colorectal cancer patients. [2022]Palonosetron, a unique second-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, has been demonstrated to control emesis related to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of palonosetron followed by a single dose of dexamethasone in patients with breast cancer (BC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving moderate emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC).
Aprepitant, dexamethasone, and palonosetron in the prevention of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-induced nausea and vomiting. [2021]This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant, dexamethasone, and palonosetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients receiving their initial cycle of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC).
Gene expression signatures that predict outcome of tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor-positive, high-risk, primary breast cancer patients: a DBCG study. [2021]Tamoxifen significantly improves outcome for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, but the 15-year recurrence rate remains 30%. The aim of this study was to identify gene profiles that accurately predicted the outcome of ER+ breast cancer patients who received adjuvant Tamoxifen mono-therapy.
Health-related quality of life of patients with advanced breast cancer treated with everolimus plus exemestane versus placebo plus exemestane in the phase 3, randomized, controlled, BOLERO-2 trial. [2020]The randomized, controlled BOLERO-2 (Breast Cancer Trials of Oral Everolimus) trial demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival with the use of everolimus plus exemestane (EVE + EXE) versus placebo plus exemestane (PBO + EXE) in patients with advanced breast cancer who developed disease progression after treatment with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. This analysis investigated the treatment effects on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
Molecular Alterations and Everolimus Efficacy in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Overexpressing Metastatic Breast Cancers: Combined Exploratory Biomarker Analysis From BOLERO-1 and BOLERO-3. [2018]Two recent phase III trials, BOLERO-1 and BOLERO-3 (Breast Cancer Trials of Oral Everolimus), evaluated the addition of everolimus to trastuzumab and chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing advanced breast cancer. The current analysis aimed to identify biomarkers to predict the clinical efficacy of everolimus treatment.
Sur8 mediates tumorigenesis and metastasis in colorectal cancer. [2018]Sur8, a scaffold protein of the Ras pathway, interacts with Ras and Raf and modulates the Ras-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway. Here we show that Sur8 is overexpressed in established human colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines and CRC patient tissues. Moreover, Sur8 expression is increased during liver metastasis in CRC patients. Sur8 knockdown decreases ERK and Akt activities in CRC cell lines, regardless of their K-Ras, B-Raf or PI3K mutation status. Overexpression or knockdown of Sur8 increases or decreases, respectively, the proliferation or transformation of CRC cell lines. Sur8 knockdown attenuates the migration and invasion of HCT116 CRC cells. Subcutaneous or orthotopic injection of HCT116 cells harboring a doxycycline (Dox)-mediated Sur8 knockdown system in nude mice resulted in decreased tumorigenic potential and inhibited the liver metastatic potential of HCT116 cells. Taken together, our data support the role of Sur8 as a promoter of tumorigenesis and liver metastasis in CRC through its modulation of the Ras-ERK and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways.
Efficacy of NEPA (netupitant/palonosetron) across multiple cycles of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: A subanalysis from two phase III trials. [2020]Label="OBJECTIVES" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Breast cancer (BC) patients represent a high-risk population for experiencing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), since they frequently receive highly emetogenic anthracycline-cyclophosphamide-based (AC) chemotherapy, and are often female and young, two predisposing risk factors for CINV. Guidelines recommend the combination of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA), 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 RA (5-HT3RA), and dexamethasone (DEX) for CINV prophylaxis in AC-treated patients. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of NEPA, a fixed combination of netupitant (NETU [NK1RA]) and palonosetron (PALO [5-HT3RA]) in BC patients from two phase III studies.
BCL2 induced by LAMTOR3/MAPK is a druggable target of chemoradioresistance in mesenchymal lung cancer. [2021]Mesenchymal-type cancers after epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) were recently shown to acquire chemoresistance through expressing EMT specific transcription factors. However, druggable (or actionable) target(s) for chemoresistance in mesenchymal-type lung cancers remain unidentified. Here, we used a public clinical genomic database and mesenchymal lung cancer cells (MLCC) model derived from the A549 lung adenocarcinoma cell line to demonstrate that BCL2 expression, which is highly induced in mesenchymal-type lung cancers, as a predictor of poor prognosis in mesenchymal lung cancer patients and association with acquired chemoradioresistance. Thereby, combination treatment with BH3 mimetics, such as ABT-263 and ABT-737, clearly attenuated chemoresistance in MLCCs. BCL2 expression in MLCCs was induced by ERK1 activity through the upregulation of the MEK1/ERK1 scaffold protein MEK partner-1 (MP1). Interfering with the MEK1/MP1/ERK1 axis using a MEK1 inhibitor or MP1 depletion repressed BCL2 expression and sensitized MLCCs to chemoradiotherapy. Taken together, our results suggest that targeting druggable proteins in the MEK1/MP1/ERK1/BCL2 axis, such as MEK1 or BCL2, with currently available FDA approved drugs is a currently feasible approach to improve clinical outcomes of mesenchymal lung cancer patients.
One shot NEPA plus dexamethasone to prevent multiple-day chemotherapy in sarcoma patients. [2021]Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the most feared and disturbing adverse events of cancer treatment associated with decreased adherence to effective chemotherapy regimens. For high-risk soft tissue sarcoma patients, receiving multiple-day chemotherapy (MD-CT), antiemetic guidelines recommend a combination of an NK1 receptor antagonist (NK1-RA), a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (5HT3-RA), and dexamethasone on each day of the antineoplastic treatment. NEPA is the first oral fixed-dose combination of a highly selective NK1-RA, netupitant, and second-generation 5HT3-RA, palonosetron. So far, no data has been published in literature about the efficacy of a single dose of NEPA in MD-CT.
Palonosetron on Days 1 and 5 Versus Granisetron Daily (Days 1-5) in Germ Cell Tumour Therapy. [2020]The control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting during bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) treatment is important for maintaining treatment intensity. The effects of palonosetron and granisetron were compared in BEP chemotherapy.
Independent Validation of EarlyR Gene Signature in BIG 1-98: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial Comparing Letrozole and Tamoxifen as Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive, Early Breast Cancer. [2022]Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">EarlyR gene signature in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer is computed from the expression values of ESPL1, SPAG5, MKI67, PLK1, and PGR. EarlyR has been validated in multiple cohorts profiled using microarrays. This study sought to verify the prognostic features of EarlyR in a case-cohort sample from BIG 1-98, a randomized clinical trial of ER+ postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy (letrozole or tamoxifen).
15.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Chk1 inhibitor-induced DNA damage increases BFL1 and decreases BIM but does not protect human cancer cell lines from Chk1 inhibitor-induced apoptosis. [2023]V158411 is a potent, selective Chk1 inhibitor currently in pre-clinical development. We utilised RNA-sequencing to evaluate the gene responses to V158411 treatment. BCL2A1 was highly upregulated in U2OS cells in response to V158411 treatment with BCL2A1 mRNA increased > 400-fold in U2OS but not HT29 cells. Inhibitors of Chk1, Wee1 and topoisomerases but not other DNA damaging agents or inhibitors of ATR, ATM or DNA-PKcs increased BFL1 and decreased BIM protein. Increased BFL1 appeared limited to a subset of approximately 35% of U2OS cells. Out of 24 cell lines studied, U2OS cells were unique in being the only cell line with low basal BFL1 levels to be increased in response to DNA damage. Induction of BFL1 in U2OS cells appeared dependent on PI3K/AKT/mTOR/MEK pathway signalling but independent of NF-κB transcription factors. Inhibitors of MEK, mTOR and PI3K effectively blocked the increase in BFL1 following V15841 treatment. Increased BFL1 expression did not block apoptosis in U2OS cells in response to V158411 treatment and cells with high basal expression of BFL1 readily underwent caspase-dependent apoptosis following Chk1 inhibitor therapy. BFL1 induction in response to Chk1 inhibition appeared to be a rare event that was dependent on MEK/PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling.