← Back to Search

Spinal Implant

TOPS vs TLIF Surgery for Spinal Stenosis

N/A
Waitlist Available
Research Sponsored by Premia Spine
Eligibility Criteria Checklist
Specific guidelines that determine who can or cannot participate in a clinical trial
Must have
Must demonstrate at a single level to be treated (L2/3, L3/4 or L4/5) all three of the following: Degenerative spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis up to Grade I, at least moderate lumbar spinal stenosis, thickening of the ligamentum flavum and/or scarring of the facet joint capsule
Neurogenic claudication
Must not have
Active infections, hepatitis, AIDS, HIV, Rheumatoid arthritis, Tuberculosis, active malignancy, etc.
Spondylolisthesis greater than Grade I
Timeline
Screening 3 weeks
Treatment Varies
Follow Up 24 months
Awards & highlights

Summary

This trial is comparing two different surgeries to see which is more effective in treating lumbar spinal stenosis, Grade 1 spondylolisthesis, and thickening of the ligamentum flavum.

Who is the study for?
This trial is for adults aged 35-80 with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis, Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis, and specific ligament or joint capsule issues. Participants must have had unsuccessful non-surgical treatments for at least six months and experience significant leg pain (VAS score ≥40/100) and disability (ODI score ≥40/100). Exclusions include certain infections, allergies to implant materials, previous lumbar surgeries with instrumentation, osteoporosis, active cancer or hepatitis, immunosuppression conditions, substance dependencies including smoking, pregnancy intentions during the study period.
What is being tested?
The trial compares the TOPS System's effectiveness against TLIF in stabilizing a single lumbar level after surgical decompression. It targets patients with specific back conditions who haven't improved with conservative treatment. Success is measured by patient-reported outcomes improvement without major device-related complications.
What are the potential side effects?
Potential side effects may include reactions to implant materials like PEEK or titanium such as inflammation or allergic responses; complications from surgery like infection; mechanical failure of the device leading to additional surgeries; nerve damage resulting in numbness or weakness; and persistent pain.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

You may be eligible if you check “Yes” for the criteria below
Select...
I have a slipped disc, spinal narrowing, and thickened ligaments or scarred facet joints in my lower back.
Select...
I experience leg pain from spinal nerve issues when I walk.
Select...
I have leg pain rated at least 40 out of 100.
Select...
I am between 35 and 80 years old.
Select...
My leg pain is worse than my lower back pain by at least 10 points.
Select...
My back pain significantly limits my daily activities.

Exclusion Criteria

You may be eligible for the trial if you check “No” for criteria below:
Select...
I do not have active infections or conditions like hepatitis, AIDS, HIV, rheumatoid arthritis, tuberculosis, or another active cancer.
Select...
My spine condition is more severe than a minor slip (Grade I).
Select...
I have had back surgery with hardware installed.
Select...
My spine curvature is more than 10 degrees.
Select...
I have a herniated disc with a free fragment.
Select...
I have damaged vertebrae in my spine.
Select...
I have nerve issues affecting my lower back, bowel, or bladder.
Select...
I am not on medication that could affect healing or receiving radiation therapy.

Timeline

Screening ~ 3 weeks
Treatment ~ Varies
Follow Up ~24 months
This trial's timeline: 3 weeks for screening, Varies for treatment, and 24 months for reporting.

Treatment Details

Study Objectives

Outcome measures can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.
Primary outcome measures
Absence of any major device related adverse event
Improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Maintenance or improvement in Neurological status as assessed by a standard neurological exam performed by Investigator
+3 more
Secondary outcome measures
Greater range-of-motion through flexion-extension
Improvement (20 mm) in visual analogue scale (VAS) for back pain and worst leg
Reduction in physical component score on SF-12

Trial Design

2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: TOPS SystemExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Investigational surgical treatment using TOPS System
Group II: Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)Active Control1 Intervention
Control surgical treatment using interbody fusion and placement of posterolateral instrumentation
Treatment
First Studied
Drug Approval Stage
How many patients have taken this drug
Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS)
2017
N/A
~310

Find a Location

Who is running the clinical trial?

Premia SpineLead Sponsor
2 Previous Clinical Trials
20 Total Patients Enrolled

Media Library

Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS) (Spinal Implant) Clinical Trial Eligibility Overview. Trial Name: NCT03012776 — N/A
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Research Study Groups: TOPS System, Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Clinical Trial 2023: Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS) Highlights & Side Effects. Trial Name: NCT03012776 — N/A
Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS) (Spinal Implant) 2023 Treatment Timeline for Medical Study. Trial Name: NCT03012776 — N/A
~38 spots leftby Aug 2025