What side effects are associated with this type of intervention?

The Hall Technique and Modified Hall Technique, which involve placing preformed metal crowns without tooth preparation or anesthesia, generally have minimal side effects. Commonly reported issues include initial discomfort or pressure, minor gum irritation, and transient sensitivity. These techniques avoid the more invasive procedures associated with traditional methods, such as drilling and local anesthesia, thereby reducing the risk of pain, infection, and post-operative complications. Overall, these methods are well-tolerated and considered safe for managing primary molars with proximal caries lesions.

What prior FDA approvals exist?

The provided context does not mention specific FDA approvals or related drugs for the treatment of tooth decay that are similar to the Hall Technique and Modified Hall Technique. These techniques involve the non-invasive placement of preformed metal crowns without tooth preparation or anesthesia, and the context does not provide information on FDA-approved treatments that align with these methods. Generally, FDA-approved treatments for tooth decay include fluoride varnishes, dental sealants, and restorative materials, but specific approvals for non-invasive crown placement techniques are not detailed.

What other types of research exist?

Promising novel alternatives to the Hall Technique and Modified Hall Technique for treating tooth decay include Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) application, which arrests caries progression and is non-invasive, and Resin Infiltration (e.g., ICON), which is minimally invasive and preserves tooth structure. Both methods are gaining popularity due to their effectiveness and minimal discomfort for patients.

← Back to Search

Dental Crown Techniques for Tooth Decay

N/A

Recruiting

Led By Nathanael O Salako, BDS,MSc

Research Sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Eligibility Criteria Checklist

Specific guidelines that determine who can or cannot participate in a clinical trial

Must have

Be younger than 18 years old

Must not have

Medically compromised children

Teeth with furcation or peri radicular pathologies

Timeline

Screening 3 weeks

Treatment Varies

Follow Up 12 months post intervention

Awards & highlights

No Placebo-Only Group

Summary

This trial compares different methods to fix cavities in children's baby molars. It looks at how well various techniques work by placing a protective cap over the damaged tooth.

Who is the study for?

This trial is for medically fit children with cooperative behavior during dental X-rays. It's for those who have primary molars with early-stage tooth decay (D1 lesions) without severe pulp damage or issues at the roots of their teeth as seen on X-rays.

What is being tested?

The study compares three ways to treat cavities in kids' back teeth: the conventional method using Stainless-Steel Crowns, and two variations called Hall Technique and Modified Hall Technique, which differ in application but aim to be less invasive.

What are the potential side effects?

While not specified here, dental procedures can typically cause discomfort, swelling, sensitivity in the treated area, and sometimes temporary pain. The specific side effects may vary depending on each child's experience.

Eligibility Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

You may be eligible for the trial if you check “No” for criteria below:

Select...

My child has a serious health condition.

Select...

I have issues with the roots of my teeth or gum disease around them.

Select...

I have a severe toothache in my baby molar that doesn't go away.

Timeline

Screening ~ 3 weeks3 visits

Treatment ~ Varies

Follow Up ~ 12 months post intervention

Screening ~ 3 weeks

Treatment ~ Varies

Follow Up ~12 months post intervention

This trial's timeline: 3 weeks for screening, Varies for treatment, and 12 months post intervention for reporting.

Treatment Details

Study Objectives

Study objectives can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.

Secondary study objectives

Anterior occlusal contact

Biofilm around the stainless steel crown as assessed by the Modified Plaque Index

Gingival health of the treated tooth as assessed by gingival status score

+2 more

Awards & Highlights

No Placebo-Only Group

All patients enrolled in this study will receive some form of active treatment.

Trial Design

3Treatment groups

Experimental Treatment

Active Control

Group I: Modified Hall Technique (MHT)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention

Group II: Hall Technique (HT)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention

Group III: Conventional Technique (CT)Active Control1 Intervention

0 / 3Eligibility criteria met

Research Highlights

Information in this section is not a recommendation. We encourage patients to speak with their healthcare team when evaluating any treatment decision.

Mechanism Of Action

Side Effect Profile

Prior Approvals

Other Research

The Hall Technique and Modified Hall Technique treat tooth decay by placing preformed metal crowns over decayed primary molars without tooth preparation or anesthesia. These methods seal the decayed tooth, cutting off the bacteria's nutrient supply and stopping the decay's progression. This non-invasive approach is particularly advantageous for patients, as it minimizes discomfort, anxiety, and the need for more invasive dental procedures.

Comparison of modified Bass, Fones and normal tooth brushing technique for the efficacy of plaque control in young adults- A randomized clinical trial.Promoting behavioural changes to improve oral hygiene in patients with periodontal diseases: A systematic review.Twenty Years of Full-Mouth Disinfection: The Past, the Present and the Future.