GVHD-Reduction Strategies for Blood Cancers

Recruiting in Palo Alto (17 mi)

+2 other locations

Overseen by Marie Bleakley

Age: < 65

Sex: Any

Travel: May Be Covered

Time Reimbursement: Varies

Trial Phase: Phase 2

Recruiting

Sponsor: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Must not be taking: Checkpoint inhibitors

Disqualifiers: CNS involvement, HIV, uncontrolled infections, organ dysfunction, pregnancy, others

No Placebo Group

Prior Safety Data

Breakthrough Therapy

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This phase II trial investigates two strategies and how well they work for the reduction of graft versus host disease in patients with acute leukemia or MDS in remission. Giving chemotherapy and total-body irradiation before a donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cells in the bone marrow, including normal blood-forming cells (stem cells) and cancer cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. When the healthy stem cells from a donor are infused into the patient, they may help the patient's bone marrow make stem cells, red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. The donated stem cells may also replace the patient's immune cells and help destroy any remaining cancer cells.

Do I need to stop my current medications for this trial?

The trial protocol does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss your specific medications with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment for reducing GVHD in blood cancer patients?

Research shows that using cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus after stem cell transplantation can effectively prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with low nonrelapse mortality, while maintaining disease control. Additionally, methotrexate and cyclosporine have been shown to significantly reduce acute GVHD and improve disease-free survival in patients with hematologic malignancies.

^{1 2 3 4 5}

Is the treatment generally safe for humans?

The treatment, which includes drugs like fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and thiotepa, has been shown to be generally safe in humans, with studies reporting low toxicity and good tolerance even in patients with advanced disease or poor health status. Some patients experienced graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), but overall, the regimens were well tolerated.

^{1 6 7 8 9}

How does the drug combination of Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine, Methotrexate, and Thiotepa differ from other treatments for GVHD in blood cancers?

This drug combination is unique because it uses a non-radiotherapy conditioning regimen that includes fludarabine and thiotepa, which has shown promise in reducing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) while maintaining effective disease control. Additionally, post-transplant cyclophosphamide is used to further prevent GVHD, offering a novel approach compared to traditional methods that often rely on radiotherapy.

^{1 3 10 11 12}

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for patients with acute leukemia or MDS in remission, aged 1-60, who have a matched donor for stem cell transplant. They must be vaccinated against COVID-19 and cannot participate if they weigh over 100 kg, are HIV positive, have significant organ dysfunction like kidney failure or heart issues, are pregnant/breastfeeding, unwilling to use birth control post-transplant, or have uncontrolled infections.

Inclusion Criteria

I am between 1 and 60 years old.

Must be vaccinated against COVID19. 'COVID vaccinated' is as defined by the NMDP and number of required doses may vary according to vaccine manufacturer and evolving guidelines.

I am between 1 and 50 years old and eligible for a specific treatment plan.

Exclusion Criteria

I weigh less than 100 kg and have an HLA-matched unrelated donor.

I have an organ that is not working properly.

I have had a bone marrow transplant before.

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Pre-Transplant Conditioning

Patients receive chemotherapy and total-body irradiation to prepare for stem cell transplantation

2 weeks

Daily visits for treatment administration

Transplantation

Infusion of donor peripheral blood stem cells and administration of supportive medications

1 day

In-patient stay for transplantation

Post-Transplant Monitoring

Monitoring for graft versus host disease and other complications, with tapering of immunosuppressive medications if no GVHD is observed

50 days

Regular in-patient and out-patient visits

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

2 years

Visits at days 7, 14, 21, 28, 56, 80, 180, 270, and at 1, 1.5, and 2 years

Participant Groups

The trial tests two strategies to reduce graft versus host disease after a donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant. Patients receive chemotherapy and total-body irradiation before the transplant to stop cancer growth and prepare their body to accept the donor's healthy stem cells.

Group I: Arm D2 (busulfan, tacrolimus, methotrexate) [DISCONTINUED NOVEMBER 2021] Experimental Treatment 11 Interventions

Patients receive busulfan IV over 180 minutes on days -8 to -5, cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days -3 to -2, tacrolimus (or cyclosporine or sirolimus if toxicities occur) IV continuously starting on day -1, PBSC IV on day 0, and methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, 6, and 11. If there is no evidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD on or prior to day 50, tacrolimus (or cyclosporine or sirolimus) is tapered per month for capsules (or per week for liquid). Patients also undergo bone marrow aspiration/biopsy, ECHO or MUGA scan, and collection of blood samples throughout the trial.

Group II: Arm D1 (TBI, tacrolimus, methotrexate) [DISCONTINUED NOVEMBER 2021] Experimental Treatment 11 Interventions

Patients undergo TBI BID on days -6 to -4, and receive cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days -3 to -2, tacrolimus (or cyclosporine or sirolimus if toxicities occur) IV continuously starting on day -1, PBSC IV on day 0, and methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, 6, and 11. If there is no evidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD on or prior to day 50, tacrolimus (or cyclosporine or sirolimus) is tapered per month for capsules (or per week for liquid). Patients also undergo bone marrow aspiration/biopsy, ECHO or MUGA scan, and collection of blood samples throughout the trial.

Group III: Arm C2 (busulfan, PTCy, tacrolimus) Experimental Treatment 11 Interventions

Patients receive fludarabine IV over 30 to 60 minutes on days -5 to -2, busulfan IV over 180 minutes on days -5 to -2, PBSC IV on day 0, cyclophosphamide IV over 1 to 2 hours on days 3 and 4, and tacrolimus (or cyclosporine or sirolimus if toxicities occur) IV continuously starting on day 5. If there is no evidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD on or prior to day 50, tacrolimus (or cyclosporine or sirolimus) is tapered per month for capsules (or per week for liquid). Patients also undergo bone marrow aspiration/biopsy, ECHO or MUGA scan, and collection of blood samples throughout the trial.

Group IV: Arm C1 (TBI, PTCy, tacrolimus) Experimental Treatment 10 Interventions

Patients undergo TBI BID on days -4 to -2 or -3 to -1, and receive PBSC IV on day 0. Patients also receive cyclophosphamide IV over 1 to 2 hours on days 3 and 4, and tacrolimus (or cyclosporine or sirolimus if toxicities occur) IV continuously starting on day 5. If there is no evidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD on or prior to day 50, tacrolimus (or cyclosporine or sirolimus) is tapered per month for capsules (or per week for liquid). Patients also undergo bone marrow aspiration/biopsy, ECHO or MUGA scan, and collection of blood samples throughout the trial.

Group V: Arm A2 (busulfan, TnD) Experimental Treatment 11 Interventions

Patients receive fludarabine IV over 30 to 60 minutes on days -6 to -2, busulfan IV over 180 minutes on days -5 to -2, and undergo TBI BID on day -1. Patients also receive tacrolimus (or cyclosporine or sirolimus if toxicities occur) IV continuously starting on day -1, CD34+ enriched CD45RA-depleted donor T-lymphocytes IV on day 0, and methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, 6, and 11. If there is no evidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD on or prior to day 50, tacrolimus (or cyclosporine or sirolimus) is tapered per month for capsules (or per week for liquid). Patients also undergo bone marrow aspiration/biopsy, ECHO or MUGA scan, and collection of blood samples throughout the trial.

Group VI: Arm A1 (TBI, TnD) Experimental Treatment 12 Interventions

Patients undergo TBI BID on days -10 to -7, and receive thiotepa IV over 3 hours on days -6 and -5, fludarabine IV over 30 to 60 minutes on days -6 to -2, tacrolimus (or cyclosporine or sirolimus if toxicities occur) IV continuously starting on day -1, CD34+ enriched CD45RA-depleted donor T-lymphocytes IV on day 0, and methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, 6, and 11. If there is no evidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD on or prior to day 50, tacrolimus (or cyclosporine or sirolimus) is tapered per month for capsules (or per week for liquid). Patients also undergo bone marrow aspiration/biopsy, ECHO or MUGA scan, and collection of blood samples throughout the trial.

Cyclophosphamide is already approved in United States, European Union, Canada, Japan for the following indications:

🇺🇸 Approved in United States as Cytoxan for:

• Breast cancer
• Ovarian cancer
• Multiple myeloma
• Leukemia
• Lymphoma
• Rheumatoid arthritis

🇪🇺 Approved in European Union as Endoxan for:

• Breast cancer
• Ovarian cancer
• Multiple myeloma
• Leukemia
• Lymphoma
• Rheumatoid arthritis

🇨🇦 Approved in Canada as Neosar for:

• Breast cancer
• Ovarian cancer
• Multiple myeloma
• Leukemia
• Lymphoma
• Rheumatoid arthritis

🇯🇵 Approved in Japan as Endoxan for:

• Breast cancer
• Ovarian cancer
• Multiple myeloma
• Leukemia
• Lymphoma

Find a Clinic Near You

Research Locations Nearby Select from list below to view details:

University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute (UPCI) Pittsburgh, PA

Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium Seattle, WA

Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa, FL

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Lead Sponsor

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Lead Sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI) Collaborator

References

1. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Non-radiotherapy conditioning with stem cell transplantation from alternative donors in children with refractory severe aplastic anemia. [2013] Conditioning including total body/lymphoid irradiation is widely used to prevent graft rejection in patients with refractory severe aplastic anemia (SAA) undergoing hemopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from alternative donors and or after graft manipulation. To reduce regimen-related toxicity we transplanted three children with refractory SAA after conditioning with radiotherapy-free regimens. Conditioning included fludarabine 175-180 mg/m2 in all patients. In addition, patient 1 (failing two previous grafts) received thiotepa 10 mg/kg and Campath-1H 60 mg/m2; patient 2 cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, thiotepa 15 mg/kg and OKT-3 0.1 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks; and patient 3 cyclophosphamide 120 and ATG 90 mg/kg. Stem cell source was unmanipulated marrow from the same unrelated donor as for the two previous transplantations in patient 1 and CD34+-purified peripheral blood stem cells from an HLA-matched unrelated donor and from the haploidentical mother in patients 2 and 3. Only patient 1 received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil. Follow-up is now 30, 51, and 15 months. None of the patients developed GVHD. All patients have normal counts with complete donor chimerism. Fludarabine-based conditioning is powerfully immunosuppressive and may be used for children with refractory SAA undergoing HCT from alternative donors even after rejection following previous HCT.

2. United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with methotrexate and cyclosporine after busulfan and cyclophosphamide in patients with hematologic malignancies. [2021] The combination of two powerful immunosuppressive agents, methotrexate (MTX) and cyclosporine (CSP), has resulted in a significant decrease in the morbidity and mortality after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). However, the additive toxicities from ablative preparative regimens may lead to suboptimal use of this combined immunoprophylaxis. We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of administering MTX/CSP with busulfan (4 mg/kg/d for 4 days) and cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg/d for 4 days) (BuCy4) in 101 consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies categorized into high- and low-risk groups receiving HLA-matched marrow grafts. Postgrafting immunosuppression consisted of MTX short course (15 mg/m2 on day 1 and 10 mg/m2 on days 3, 6, and 11) and intravenous CSP (1.5 mg/kg every 12 hours). Eighty-three patients (82.1%) received 100% of MTX calculated dose and 87 (86.1%) achieved a CSP therapeutic level (250 to 600 ng/mL) within a median of 16 days. Seventy-three patients (72.2%) received optimal immunosuppressive therapy comprising a full MTX course and achieving CSP therapeutic concentrations. The Kaplan-Meier estimated incidence of grade II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 9.2% for all patients and 5.5% in patients receiving optimal GVHD prophylaxis. Eighty-nine patients (88.2%) survived > or = 100 days posttransplant and 43 (48.3%) developed chronic GVHD, the majority of which were de novo (31 of 43). The estimated incidence of relapse was 28.9% for all patients and 14.8% in the low-risk group, with a median follow-up of 24.5 months. High-risk features and the absence of chronic GVHD were significantly associated with relapse (P = .002 and .036, respectively) in multivariate analyses. Projected disease-free survival at 2 years was 52.3% for all patients and 65.2% in low-risk patients. Disease-free survival was significantly improved in optimally treated patients (P = .03) due to a lower incidence of early deaths from acute GVHD and infectious episodes. In conclusion, optimal delivery of MTX/CSP in association with BuCy4 resulted in a near complete abrogation of acute GVHD in HLA-matched transplants and a significantly improved disease-free survival.

3. United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide and Tacrolimus-Mycophenolate Mofetil Combination Prevents Graft-versus-Host Disease in Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation from HLA-Matched Donors. [2018] Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) remains the only curative therapy for many hematologic malignancies but it is limited by high nonrelapse mortality (NRM), primarily from unpredictable control of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Recently, post-transplant cyclophosphamide demonstrated improved GVHD control in allogeneic bone marrow HCT. Here we explore cyclophosphamide in allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (alloPBSCT). Patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies received alloPBSCT from HLA-matched unrelated/related donors. GVHD prophylaxis included combination post-HCT cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg (days +3 and +4) and tacrolimus/mofetil mycophenolate (T/MMF) (day +5 forward). The primary objective was the cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD. Between March 2011 and May 2015, 35 consecutive patients received the proposed regimen. MMF was stopped in all patients at day +28; the median discontinuation of tacrolimus was day +113. Acute and chronic GVHD cumulative incidences were 17% and 7%, respectively, with no grade IV GVHD events, only 2 patients requiring chronic GVHD immunosuppression control, and no deaths from GVHD. Two-year NRM, overall survival, event-free survival, and chronic GVHD event-free survival rates were 3%, 77%, 54%, and 49%, respectively. The graft-versus-tumor effect was maintained as 5 of 15 patients (33%) who received HCT with evidence of disease experienced further disease response. A post-transplant cyclophosphamide + T/MMF combination strategy effectively prevented acute and chronic GVHD after alloPBSCT from HLA-matched donors and achieved an unprecedented low NRM without losing efficacy in disease control or impaired development of the graft-versus-tumor effect. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02300571.

4. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Individual patient data meta-analysis of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplant vs bone marrow transplant in the management of hematological malignancies: indirect assessment of the effect of day 11 methotrexate administration. [2018] The effects of immunosuppressive regimens on the outcomes of patients with hematological malignancies undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation remain uncertain. We conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis using data from nine randomized trials comparing allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSCT) transplants to bone marrow (BMT) transplants, focusing on the administration of three vs four doses of methotrexate (MTX) as part of a regimen for graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis which included cyclosporine. Six trials containing 573 patients prescribed four doses of MTX while three trials containing 534 patients prescribed three doses of MTX. Four doses of MTX conferred a statistically significant survival advantage, resulting in death odds ratio (OR) 0.67 (CI 0.52-0.88) (P=0.0036) for recipients of PBSC compared to BM; with three doses, there was no statistically significant difference. In the four-dose studies relapse rates were 36.6% among recipients of BM compared to 19.2% among recipients of PBSC (P=0.0015). The rates of relapse in the three dose studies were 26% for both PBSC and BM. We hypothesize that the fourth dose of MTX provides extra immunosuppression among BM recipients resulting in a reduced anti-leukemic effect. This hypothesis can only be proved or disproved by a prospective, randomized trial.

5. United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Efficacy of folinic acid rescue following MTX GVHD prophylaxis: results of a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. [2022] The use of methotrexate (MTX) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is associated with increased rates of organ-specific toxicities. Despite limited data, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation-European LeukemiaNet working group recommend the use of folinic acid (FA) rescue to reduce MTX toxicity after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we explored whether FA rescue reduces MTX-induced toxicity. We enrolled patients undergoing allo-HCT with myeloablative conditioning with peripheral blood stem cell grafts, with GVHD prophylaxis consisting of cyclosporine and MTX. Patients were randomized to receive FA or placebo starting 24 hours after each MTX dose and continuing over 24 hours in 3 to 4 divided doses. The primary end point was the rate of grades 3 and 4 oral mucositis. After enrollment of 52 patients (FA, n = 28; placebo, n = 24), preplanned interim analysis revealed similar rates of grade 3 and 4 (46.6% vs 45.8%; P = .97) and grades 1 to 4 (83.3% vs 77.8%; P = .65) oral mucositis. With a median follow-up of 17 (range, 4.5-50) months, there was no difference in the rates of acute and chronic GVHD, disease relapse, nonrelapse mortality, and overall survival. These interim results did not support continuation of the study. We conclude that FA rescue after MTX GVHD prophylaxis does not decrease regimen-related toxicity or affect transplantation outcomes. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02506231.

6. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Rapid achievement of complete donor chimerism and low regimen-related toxicity after reduced conditioning with fludarabine, carmustine, melphalan and allogeneic transplantation. [2013] Between August 1998 and July 1999, 21 patients received a novel protocol of reduced conditioning with fludarabine, carmustine and melphalan (FBM) followed by matched-related allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) in a prospective multi-center phase I/II study. Cyclosporin A and 'mini-methotrexate' were used for GVHD prophylaxis. Patients were included because of age, advanced disease, previous transplantation or co-morbidity. Hematopoietic engraftment after allogeneic transplantation was rapid with a median white blood count (WBC) >1 x 10(9)/l on day +11 (range 10-17) and a median platelet count >20 x 10(9)/l on day +13 (range 9-36). Donor chimerism was complete in 16/21 (76%) patients at all time points during follow-up and mixed at least on one occasion in 5/21 (24%) patients. The conditioning regimen was well tolerated with low toxicity even in previously transplanted patients. Thirteen patients (62%) developed acute GVHD grades II-IV. Nineteen out of 21 patients achieved complete (CR, n = 15) or partial remission (PR, n = 4) with a median patient follow-up of 354+ days (range 258-577) for patients alive. The reduced intensity protocol FBM is feasible with rapid engraftment, early achievement of complete donor chimerism, low toxicity, especially in heavily pretreated patients, and good response rates in advanced disease patients.

7. Germany pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Association of fludarabine pharmacokinetic/dynamic biomarkers with donor chimerism in nonmyeloablative HCT recipients. [2018] Fludarabine monophosphate (fludarabine) is an integral component of many reduced-intensity conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Fludarabine's metabolite, 9-β-D-arabinofuranosyl-2-fluoroadenine (F-ara-A), undergoes cellular uptake and activation to form the active cytotoxic metabolite fludarabine triphosphate (F-ara-ATP), which inhibits cellular DNA synthesis in CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells. In this study, we evaluated whether fludarabine-based pharmacologic biomarkers were associated with clinical outcomes in HCT recipients.

8. Germany pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Thiotepa and fludarabine (TT-FLUDA) as conditioning regimen in poor candidates for conventional allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplant. [2019] Standard conditioning for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation induces high transplant-related mortality (TRM) in patients with a poor performance status. Less intensive regimens have been tested to reduce the TRM; our purpose was to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of a new combination: thiotepa and fludarabine (TT-FLUDA). Six patients received 5 mg thiotepa/kg daily from day -8 to -7 and 25 mg fludarabine/m2 daily from day -6 to -2 followed by an allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell infusion; three of these patients with signs of overt leukemia received 18 mg idarubicin/m2 i.v. at day -12. Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was performed i.v. with 1 mg cyclosporine A/kg per day from day -5 to the day of marrow engraftment, then 6 mg/kg per day orally up to day +100, and 10 mg methotrexate/m2 at day +1, and 8 mg/m2 at days +3, +6, and +11. Chimerism was studied with fluorescent in situ hybridization for sex chromosomes (XY-FISH) and minisatellite polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at days +30, +100, +180, and +360. Engraftment was achieved in all cases with complete donor chimerism in all but one patient who had refractory acute leukemia. No major toxicity was noticed; only one patient died at day +51 of acute GVHD because of early cyclosporine A discontinuation. One patient with refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) had a testicular relapse at day +180. Three patients (one with mantle cell lymphoma, two with acute myeloid leukemia) are still in continuous complete remission (CR) with complete donor chimerism at days +180, +210, and +450, respectively. TT-FLUDA seems to be well tolerated, allowing engraftment and stable donor chimerism in patients who are poor candidates for conventional conditioning regimens.

9. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Fludarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide decreases incidence of GVHD and maintains effective graft-versus-leukemia effect after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in murine lymphocytic leukemia. [2013] Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a severe disorder and despite therapeutic efforts to decrease its distressing clinical manifestations, treatment is still not optimal. Here we report the results of studies, in which the purine analogue, fludarabine phosphate, was used in an attempt to modify and decrease GVHD after stem cell transplantation, across major histocompatibility barriers for murine leukemia. B-cell leukemia (BCL-1) bearing (BALB/c x C57BL/6) F1 mice received two cycles of fludarabine (0.8 mg/kg) for 5 days every 2 weeks, followed by 400 mg/kg cyclophosphamide i.p. Animals were then transplanted with C57BL/6 precursor cells and the development of leukemia and extent of GVHD was monitored both clinically and histopathologically. In the fludarabine-treated group, only nine of 28 (32%) mice developed leukemia, compared to 25 of 33 (76%) of control animals (P=0.0006 ). Mice treated with fludarabine-containing regimens prior to transplantation also had much less GVHD both clinically and at autopsy, while graft-versus-leukemia appeared to be augmented in the same animals.

10. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Incorporating posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis as standard-of-care outside the haploidentical setting: challenges and review of the literature. [2021] Posttransplant high-dose cyclophosphamide (PTCy) effectively prevents GvHD after haploidentical SCT. However, its use in HLA-matched SCT has been less explored. Fifty-six consecutive patients who underwent allo-SCT for hematological malignancies have been included in this prospective single-center protocol. Donors have been HLA-identical siblings, fully-matched unrelated or 1-allele-mismatched unrelated donors in 30%, 32%, and 37% of cases, respectively. Nine patients have received a TBI-containing MAC regimen, while the remaining (84%) received RIC platforms based on Fludarabine plus Busulfan/Melphalan. Due to the high graft failure (GF) rate (21%) in a preliminary analysis in the allo-RIC cohort (n = 29), protocol amendments have been implemented, with no further cases of GF after the introduction of mini-thiotepa (0/18). The overall incidence of grade II-IV acute GvHD is 24% (95% CI: 17-31%) with four steroid-refractory cases. Severe chronic GvHD has occurred in only 1 of 43 evaluable cases. The 1-year NRM and relapse are 18% (95% CI: 12-26%) and 30% (18-42%) and the OS and DFS are 78% and 64%, respectively. These outcomes support the feasibility of using PTCy as a SOC outside the haplo-setting, albeit mini-thiotepa (3 mg/kg) was incorporated in the standard allo-RIC platforms to prevent GF. Despite the limitations of a single-center experience and the short follow-up, these protocols show promising results with particular benefit in reducing the occurrence of moderate-to-severe GvHD.

11. England pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Fludarabine phosphate and melphalan: a reduced intensity conditioning regimen suitable for allogeneic transplantation that maintains the graft versus malignancy effect. [2021] Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for allogeneic stem cell transplantation allows stable donor cell engraftment with the maintenance of a graft versus malignancy effect. Many different regimens exist employing various combinations of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and T-cell depletion. We examined the role of non-T-cell depleted RIC regimens in 56 patients with haematological malignancies. Patients received fludarabine phosphate for 5 days (30 mg/m2 in 35 patients, 25 mg/m2 in 21 patients) and melphalan for 1 day (140 mg/m2 in 36 patients, 100 mg/m2 in 20 patients). Immunosuppression was with CyA alone in 33 patients and CyA/MTX in 23 patients. Twenty-four of the 26 patients with chimerism data showed >95% donor chimerism at 3 months post transplant. aGVHD occurred in 18% of patients receiving CyA/MTX compared to 53% of patients receiving CyA. The 100-day mortality rate was 0.16 (95%CI 0.08-0.28) and 1-year nonrelapse mortality was 0.24 (95%CI 0.13-0.38). Thirty-three patients remained alive and in CR at a median of 19 months post transplant (range 3-38 months). We have shown that patients transplanted with fludarabine phosphate, melphalan 100 mg/m2 and with CyA/MTX as post transplant immunosuppression can achieve good disease control with an acceptable level of toxicity. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

12. Switzerland pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Controversies and expectations for the prevention of GVHD: A biological and clinical perspective. [2022] Severe acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Historically, cord blood and matched sibling transplantation has been associated with the lowest rates of GVHD. Newer methods have modified the lymphocyte components to minimize alloimmunity, including: anti-thymocyte globulin, post-transplant cyclophosphamide, alpha/beta T cell depletion, and abatacept. These agents have shown promise in reducing severe GVHD, however, can be associated with increased risks of relapse, graft failure, infections, and delayed immune reconstitution. Nonetheless, these GVHD prophylaxis strategies have permitted expansion of donor sources, especially critical for those of non-Caucasian decent who previously lacked transplant options. This review will focus on the biologic mechanisms driving GVHD, the method by which each agent impacts these activated pathways, and the clinical consequences of these modern prophylaxis approaches. In addition, emerging novel targeted strategies will be described. These GVHD prophylaxis approaches have revolutionized our ability to increase access to transplant and have provided important insights into the biology of GVHD and immune reconstitution.