~13 spots leftby Apr 2026

Cooling Strategies for Heat Stress

Recruiting in Palo Alto (17 mi)
Age: 18+
Sex: Male
Travel: May Be Covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Academic
Recruiting
Sponsor: University of Ottawa
Must not be taking: Antidepressants, Antihistamines, Diuretics
Disqualifiers: Diabetes, Hypertension, others
No Placebo Group

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

Occupational heat stress directly threatens workers' ability to live healthy and productive lives. Heat exposed workers are at an elevated risk of experiencing impaired work performance and cognitive function leading to a greater risk of work-related injuries which includes traumatic injury and a myriad of pathophysiological conditions (e.g., heat stroke, acute kidney injury, adverse cardiovascular events). To mitigate the adverse health effects of occupational heat stress, safety organizations recommend upper limits for heat stress, typically defined by a worker's metabolic rate and the prevailing wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT). In instances where the heat load created by the combination of work intensity, environment, and clothing worn exceed the upper heat stress limits (uncompensable heat stress), controls such as rest breaks are prescribed to limit increases in core temperature beyond recommended limits. While workers are encouraged to find shelter from the heat during a rest break, it is not always possible or feasible. Typically, workers may rest while remaining exposed to the heat, recover in a shaded area or rest in an air-conditioned room or vehicle. However, the effectiveness of these cooling strategies in mitigating the level of physiological strain experienced by the worker during prolonged work in a hot environment remains unclear. In this project, the investigators will assess the efficacy of the different cooling strategies in preventing excursions in core temperature beyond recommended limits (38.0°C) following the initial stay time for moderate-intensity work in hot ambient conditions (WBGT of 29°C; represents hot outdoor conditions experienced by workers in summers in Ontario, Canada) in context of the prescribed American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) work-to-rest allocation for unacclimated adults. On three separate days, participants will walk on a treadmill at a fixed metabolic rate of 200 W/m2 until core temperature reaches and/or exceeds 38.0°C or until volitional fatigue. Thereafter, participants will complete an additional 180 min work bout employing the recommended ACGIH work-to-rest allocation of 1:3 (starting with a 45 min rest break followed by a 15 min work bout, with the cycle repeated three times over the 180 min work simulation bout) without (Control) or with cooling mitigation during each 15-min break consisting of either: i) partial cooling equivalent to sitting in a shaded space (WBGT 24°C; 31.7°C and 35% RH) such as under a tree with a light breeze (simulated with pedestal fan fixed at \~2 m/s) or ii) full cooling equivalent to sitting in air-conditioned space (e.g., room or vehicle) maintained at 22°C and 35% RH (equivalent WBGT of 16°C).

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial requires that participants do not use medications that significantly affect body temperature regulation and heat tolerance, such as antidepressants, antihistamines, and diuretics. If you are taking these types of medications, you may need to stop them to participate.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment for cooling strategies during heat stress?

Research shows that cooling strategies, such as using fans or cooling vests, can help reduce heat stress by lowering body temperature, heart rate, and sweat production during work in hot environments. Continuous cooling methods, like using conditioned air during work and rest periods, have been found to be more effective than intermittent cooling, improving comfort and extending work times.12345

Is cooling during work in hot environments safe for humans?

The research does not provide specific safety data for cooling strategies during work in hot environments, but it emphasizes the importance of managing heat stress to prevent health issues. Effective heat stress management, including cooling strategies, is considered crucial for worker safety and health.36789

How does the treatment of cooling strategies during rest breaks for heat stress differ from other treatments?

This treatment is unique because it involves using cooling strategies, like fans, during rest breaks to reduce heat stress, which is not commonly addressed by other treatments. It focuses on practical, immediate cooling methods during work breaks, unlike other strategies that may not provide direct cooling relief.1391011

Research Team

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for healthy adults who can safely perform moderate-intensity work in hot conditions. Participants should be able to tolerate heat and engage in simulated work tasks on a treadmill. Those with medical conditions that could be worsened by heat, or who cannot follow the study's procedures, are not eligible.

Inclusion Criteria

Non-smoking individuals
Habitually active individuals who are not endurance trained (less than 2 sessions per week, less than 150 minutes per week)
Ability to provide informed consent
See 2 more

Exclusion Criteria

I often work or spend time in hot places like saunas.
I have pre-existing conditions like diabetes or high blood pressure.
I am not taking medications that affect my body's ability to regulate temperature.

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Initial Stay Time

Participants perform continuous work until core temperature reaches 38.0°C or until volitional fatigue

Up to 240 minutes

Work-Rest Allocations

Participants complete a 180-minute work bout with a 1:3 work-to-rest allocation, with or without cooling strategies

180 minutes

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for physiological responses and safety after the work-rest allocations

1-2 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Simulated work in the heat with full cooling during rest breaks (Behavioural Intervention)
  • Simulated work in the heat with no cooling during rest breaks (Behavioural Intervention)
  • Simulated work in the heat with partial cooling during rest breaks (Behavioural Intervention)
Trial OverviewThe study tests how effective different cooling strategies are during rest breaks for workers exposed to high temperatures. It compares no cooling, partial cooling (like sitting in shade), and full cooling (like being in an air-conditioned space) after working until they're too hot or tired.
Participant Groups
3Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Partial coolingExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Participants perform a continuous heavy-intensity work bout (metabolic rate of \~200 W/m2) until core temperature reaches 38.0°C (equivalent to a 1°C increase in body core temperature above resting levels), which is immediately followed by intermittent work using a 1:3 work-rest allocation, starting with a 45 min rest break followed by a 15 min work bout for an additional 180-min of work with partial cooling equivalent to sitting in a shaded space (WBGT 24°C; 31.7°C and 35% RH) such as under a tree with a light breeze (simulated with pedestal fan fixed at \~2 m/s).
Group II: Full coolingExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Participants perform a continuous heavy-intensity work bout (metabolic rate of \~200 W/m2) until core temperature reaches 38.0°C (equivalent to a 1°C increase in body core temperature above resting levels), which is immediately followed by intermittent work using a 1:3 work-rest allocation, starting with a 45 min rest break followed by a 15 min work bout for an additional 180-min of work with full cooling equivalent to sitting in air-conditioned space (e.g., room or vehicle) maintained at 22°C and 35% RH (equivalent WBGT of 16°C).
Group III: No coolingActive Control1 Intervention
Participants perform a continuous moderate-intensity work bout (metabolic rate of \~200 W/m2) until core temperature reaches 38.0°C (equivalent to a 1°C increase in body core temperature above resting levels), which is immediately followed by intermittent work using a 1:3 work-rest allocation, starting with a 45 min rest break followed by a 15 min work bout for an additional 180-min of work without cooling.

Find a Clinic Near You

Research Locations NearbySelect from list below to view details:
University of OttawaOttawa, Canada
Loading ...

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Ottawa

Lead Sponsor

Trials
231
Patients Recruited
267,000+

Findings from Research

Effectiveness of rest pauses and cooling in alleviation of heat stress during simulated fire-fighting activity.Carter, JB., Banister, EW., Morrison, JB.[2022]
Quantifying the impact of heat on human physical work capacity; part II: the observed interaction of air velocity with temperature, humidity, sweat rate, and clothing is not captured by most heat stress indices.Foster, J., Smallcombe, JW., Hodder, S., et al.[2022]
Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries.Morris, NB., Levi, M., Morabito, M., et al.[2023]
Continuous and intermittent personal microclimate cooling strategies.Bomalaski, SH., Chen, YT., Constable, SH.[2008]
Reduction of Physiological Strain Under a Hot and Humid Environment by a Hybrid Cooling Vest.Chan, APC., Yang, Y., Wong, FKW., et al.[2019]
Management of climatic heat stress risk in construction: a review of practices, methodologies, and future research.Rowlinson, S., Yunyanjia, A., Li, B., et al.[2014]
An exploratory survey of heat stress management programs in the electric power industry.Kaltsatou, A., Notley, SR., Flouris, AD., et al.[2021]
Application of the predicted heat strain model in development of localized, threshold-based heat stress management guidelines for the construction industry.Rowlinson, S., Jia, YA.[2014]
Quantifying the impact of heat on human physical work capacity; part IV: interactions between work duration and heat stress severity.Smallcombe, JW., Foster, J., Hodder, SG., et al.[2022]
Re-evaluating occupational heat stress in a changing climate.Spector, JT., Sheffield, PE.[2021]
A Systematic Review of Post-Work Core Temperature Cooling Rates Conferred by Passive Rest.Brearley, M., Berry, R., Hunt, AP., et al.[2023]

References

Effectiveness of rest pauses and cooling in alleviation of heat stress during simulated fire-fighting activity. [2022]
Quantifying the impact of heat on human physical work capacity; part II: the observed interaction of air velocity with temperature, humidity, sweat rate, and clothing is not captured by most heat stress indices. [2022]
Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries. [2023]
Continuous and intermittent personal microclimate cooling strategies. [2008]
Reduction of Physiological Strain Under a Hot and Humid Environment by a Hybrid Cooling Vest. [2019]
Management of climatic heat stress risk in construction: a review of practices, methodologies, and future research. [2014]
An exploratory survey of heat stress management programs in the electric power industry. [2021]
Application of the predicted heat strain model in development of localized, threshold-based heat stress management guidelines for the construction industry. [2014]
Quantifying the impact of heat on human physical work capacity; part IV: interactions between work duration and heat stress severity. [2022]
Re-evaluating occupational heat stress in a changing climate. [2021]
A Systematic Review of Post-Work Core Temperature Cooling Rates Conferred by Passive Rest. [2023]