~42 spots leftby Sep 2025

Walking Breaks for Cardiometabolic Health

Recruiting in Palo Alto (17 mi)
KD
Overseen byKeith Diaz, PhD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Travel: May Be Covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Academic
Recruiting
Sponsor: Columbia University
Must not be taking: Antihypertensives, Diabetes control
Disqualifiers: CVD, Diabetes, Hypertension, COPD, others
No Placebo Group

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The purpose of this Phase 1 research study is to answer two questions: (1) How frequent should periods of prolonged sedentary time be interrupted? and (2) What is the appropriate duration or length of time of these breaks in sedentary time? To address these questions, this project will conduct a state-of-the-art adaptive dose finding study under controlled laboratory conditions to determine the minimally effective dose (the smallest dose) that yields cardiometabolic benefit for two separate sedentary break elements (frequency and duration). Study findings will ultimately determine how often and for how long people should break up periods of prolonged sedentary time to transiently improve established cardiovascular risk factors; key foundational information critical to the success of future long-term trials and ultimately public health guidelines. Primary Aim: To determine the minimally effective dose combination(s) of frequency and duration needed to provide cardiometabolic benefit during an 8-hour experimentation period. Specifically, the study will determine: 1a. For each fixed duration, the minimum sedentary break frequency (e.g., every 30 min, 60 min, 120 min) that demonstrates a reduction in systolic BP, diastolic BP, or glucose compared with a sedentary control condition. 1b. For each fixed frequency, the minimum sedentary break duration (e.g., activity breaks of 1 min, 5 min, 10 min) that demonstrates a reduction in systolic BP, diastolic BP, or glucose compared with a sedentary control. Secondary Aim: It is also critical to public health strategy to assess the acceptability/feasibility of various sedentary break doses as too high a dose will yield poor uptake. To address this need, the maximally tolerated dose (the highest dose that does not cause undue physical/psychological distress) for frequency and duration of sedentary breaks will also be determined via assessment of 4 constructs: physical exhaustion/fatigue, affect (e.g., mood, emotion), tolerability (e.g., completion of dose protocol), and safety (e.g., hypoglycemia). Maximally tolerated dose will be defined as the highest dose where \<20% of participants exhibit an adverse outcome.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial requires that participants do not take medication to control blood pressure or glucose, so you may need to stop these medications to participate.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Walking Breaks for Cardiometabolic Health?

Research shows that taking breaks from sitting by walking can improve cardiometabolic health, as it helps reduce the risk factors associated with prolonged sitting, such as high blood sugar levels and poor heart health.12345

Is it safe for humans to take walking breaks to interrupt prolonged sitting?

Research shows that taking walking breaks to interrupt prolonged sitting is generally safe for humans and can improve heart and metabolic health markers, such as blood pressure and insulin levels.13678

How does the treatment of walking breaks differ from other treatments for cardiometabolic health?

Walking breaks are unique because they involve interrupting long periods of sitting with short, moderate-intensity walks, which can help improve cardiometabolic health markers like insulin and triglyceride levels. This approach is different from other treatments as it focuses on breaking up sedentary time rather than just increasing overall physical activity.12389

Research Team

KD

Keith Diaz, PhD

Principal Investigator

Florence Irving Assistant Professor of Behavioral Medicine, CUIMC

YK

Ying Kuen (Ken) Cheung, PhD

Principal Investigator

Professor of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, CUIMC

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults who can understand English or Spanish, have no chronic conditions like heart disease or diabetes, don't take blood pressure or glucose medication, and have no musculoskeletal issues. Participants should not be allergic to common foods, follow specific diets, smoke cigarettes, or have trouble with IV access.

Inclusion Criteria

No allergies to common food allergens including wheat, eggs, milk or other dairy, gluten, fructose, peanuts or other nuts
I do not have any long-term health conditions like heart disease or diabetes.
Do not currently smoke cigarettes
See 6 more

Exclusion Criteria

I am unable to give my consent.

Trial Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Experimental Condition

Participants undergo two 8-hour lab visits, one with sedentary breaks and one as a control condition, to determine the minimally effective and maximally tolerated doses of sedentary breaks.

2 lab visits (8 hours each)
2 visits (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after the experimental conditions.

4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Controlled Diet (Behavioural Intervention)
  • Sedentary Break (Walking) Condition (Behavioural Intervention)
  • Sitting (Control) Condition (Behavioural Intervention)
Trial OverviewThe study aims to find the smallest effective 'dose' of activity breaks needed during an 8-hour sitting period to improve heart health and blood sugar levels. It will test different frequencies (e.g., every 30 min) and durations (e.g., 1 min) of walking breaks against a control group that remains seated.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Sedentary Break Condition > Control ConditionExperimental Treatment3 Interventions
Participants will be assigned to the sedentary break or control condition at each lab visit. If assigned to the sedentary break condition at lab visit 1, participants will be assigned to the control condition at visit 2 (and vice versa). During the lab visit, participants will wear a heart rate monitor and ambulatory blood pressure monitor, and eat a controlled diet. Participants will have an IV inserted and blood will be drawn 11 times throughout the visit. Participants will also eat a controlled diet for two days prior to the lab visit.
Group II: Control Condition > Sedentary Break ConditionExperimental Treatment3 Interventions
Participants will be assigned to the sedentary break or control condition at each lab visit. If assigned to the sedentary break condition at lab visit 1, participants will be assigned to the control condition at visit 2 (and vice versa). During the lab visit, participants will wear a heart rate monitor and ambulatory blood pressure monitor, and eat a controlled diet. Participants will have an IV inserted and blood will be drawn 11 times throughout the visit. Participants will also eat a controlled diet for two days prior to the lab visit.

Find a Clinic Near You

Research Locations NearbySelect from list below to view details:
Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular HealthNew York, NY
Loading ...

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Columbia University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1529
Patients Recruited
2,832,000+

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Collaborator

Trials
3987
Patients Recruited
47,860,000+

Findings from Research

In a study of 5268 adults aged 20-85, those with the least sedentary behavior (SB) and the most moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) had the healthiest cardiometabolic profiles, indicating that higher activity levels are crucial for better health outcomes.
The research found that while time spent in SB alone did not predict metabolic abnormalities when accounting for MVPA, lower levels of MVPA were significantly linked to increased obesity and cardiometabolic risks, highlighting the importance of physical activity over sedentary time.
Adiposity and insufficient MVPA predict cardiometabolic abnormalities in adults.Peterson, MD., Al Snih, S., Stoddard, J., et al.[2022]
A systematic review of 45 studies found that taking breaks from sitting, particularly through walking, leads to significant improvements in cardiovascular parameters, especially blood pressure and vascular function.
Acute studies showed immediate benefits from sitting breaks, while chronic studies indicated sustained improvements in blood pressure, highlighting the importance of reducing sedentary behavior for heart health.
Effects of Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting on Cardiovascular Parameters: A systematic Review.da Silva, GO., Santini, LB., Farah, BQ., et al.[2022]
In a study involving 11 sedentary Qatari females, breaking up prolonged sitting with moderate-intensity walking significantly reduced insulin and triglyceride levels, indicating a positive impact on cardiometabolic health.
The findings suggest that incorporating short walking breaks can be a culturally appropriate strategy to improve health markers in this population, although further research is needed to assess long-term effects.
Postprandial Insulin and Triglyceride Concentrations Are Suppressed in Response to Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting in Qatari Females.Chrismas, BCR., Taylor, L., Cherif, A., et al.[2023]
In a study of 4439 adults, those who engaged in light to moderate physical activity during breaks from sedentary time (the 'Breakers' group) showed significantly better cardiometabolic health outcomes, including lower levels of adiposity and improved insulin sensitivity, compared to those with more sedentary lifestyles.
Profiles that accumulated sedentary time in shorter bouts and included physical activity breaks ('Shortened sitters' and 'Breakers') had better health markers than 'Couch potatoes' and 'Prolonged sitters', suggesting that breaking up sedentary time with any form of activity can positively impact health.
Accumulation patterns of sedentary time and breaks and their association with cardiometabolic health markers in adults.Farrahi, V., Kangas, M., Kiviniemi, A., et al.[2021]

References

Breaking prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glycemia in healthy, normal-weight adults: a randomized crossover trial. [2023]
Meta-analysis of the relationship between breaks in sedentary behavior and cardiometabolic health. [2022]
Breaks in Sedentary Time and Cardiometabolic Markers in Adolescents. [2021]
Adiposity and insufficient MVPA predict cardiometabolic abnormalities in adults. [2022]
Isotemporal Substitution Analysis of Accelerometer-Derived Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity on Cardiometabolic Health in Korean Adults: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. [2021]
Breaking up prolonged sitting with light-intensity walking improves postprandial glycemia, but breaking up sitting with standing does not. [2022]
Effects of Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting on Cardiovascular Parameters: A systematic Review. [2022]
Postprandial Insulin and Triglyceride Concentrations Are Suppressed in Response to Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting in Qatari Females. [2023]
Accumulation patterns of sedentary time and breaks and their association with cardiometabolic health markers in adults. [2021]