~0 spots leftby Jan 2025

Gallium Maltolate for Glioblastoma

Palo Alto (17 mi)
Jennifer M. Connelly, MD | Froedtert ...
Overseen byJennifer M. Connelly
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Travel: May be covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Phase 1
Recruiting
Sponsor: Medical College of Wisconsin
No Placebo Group
Approved in 1 jurisdiction

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?This trial is testing an oral medicine called gallium maltolate in patients with brain cancer that has come back after treatment. The goal is to see if the medicine can safely stop the growth of cancer cells. Gallium maltolate has shown potential in slowing the growth of glioblastoma by disrupting iron metabolism and inhibiting mitochondrial function.
Is the drug Gallium maltolate a promising treatment for glioblastoma?The provided research articles do not mention Gallium maltolate or its effects on glioblastoma, so we cannot determine if it is a promising treatment based on this information.12358
What safety data is available for Gallium Maltolate in treating glioblastoma?The provided research does not contain specific safety data for Gallium Maltolate (Gallixa) in the treatment of glioblastoma. The studies focus on other treatments such as Gliadel implants, dimethyl fumarate, and various drug delivery systems for glioblastoma. To find safety data for Gallium Maltolate, one would need to look for studies or clinical trials specifically evaluating this compound.79111214
What data supports the idea that Gallium Maltolate for Glioblastoma is an effective drug?The available research does not provide specific data supporting the effectiveness of Gallium Maltolate for treating Glioblastoma. Instead, it discusses other treatments like arsenic trioxide combined with radiotherapy, temozolomide with radiotherapy, and targeted alpha therapy. These treatments are being explored for their potential to improve outcomes for Glioblastoma patients, but there is no mention of Gallium Maltolate in the context of Glioblastoma in the provided information.3461013
Do I have to stop taking my current medications for the trial?The trial requires you to stop taking oral iron supplements or iron chelators at least one week before starting the study medication. Other medications are not specifically mentioned, so it's best to discuss with the trial team.

Eligibility Criteria

Adults diagnosed with relapsed glioblastoma who've completed standard treatments, including radiotherapy and temozolomide. They must have measurable disease or confirmed recurrence, be in fair health (ECOG 0-2), and have proper organ function. Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to contraception methods.

Inclusion Criteria

I am 18 years old or older.
I am a man and will use effective contraception or practice abstinence.
I can take care of myself and am up and about more than half of my waking hours.
My cancer's progress can be measured or has been confirmed through tests.
I have been diagnosed with GBM or my tumor has GBM-like features according to WHO standards.

Exclusion Criteria

I cannot swallow or keep pills down.
I haven't finished all recommended treatments like surgery or radiation.
I do not have severe heart, lung diseases, or uncontrolled diabetes.
I am not currently on any chemotherapy that kills cancer cells.
I haven't had chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the last 14 days.
I have a history of lung conditions like sarcoidosis or pulmonary fibrosis.

Treatment Details

The trial is testing different doses of oral gallium maltolate for safety and initial effectiveness in treating recurrent glioblastoma. Participants will receive one of several dose levels, including a recommended phase 2 dose determined during the study.
6Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Dose-expansion PhaseExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
A minimum of six participants will be enrolled in the dose expansion phase for a total of 12 subjects at the recommended phase 2 dose.
Group II: Dose-escalation Phase (500 mg)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
This is a 3 + 3 design. Participants will be entered sequentially. If 0 of 3 participants has a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), new participants may be entered at the next higher dose level. If 1 of 3 participants has a DLT, up to 3 more participants are to be treated at that same dose level. If 0 of the additional 3 participants at that dose level has a DLT, new participants may be entered at the next higher dose level. If 1 or more of the additional 3 participants experience a DLT, 0 participants are to be started at that dose level and the preceding dose is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). If 2 of 3 of the dosed participants has a DLT on the first dose level, the drug will be administered at a lower dose. If 0 of 3 participants has a DLT at the highest dose level, an additional 3 participants will be enrolled to ensure that 6 participants are treated at the MTD. The MTD is the highest dose level at which no more than 1 of 6 treated participants, experiences a DLT.
Group III: Dose-escalation Phase (2,500 mg)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
This is a 3 + 3 design. Participants will be entered sequentially. If 0 of 3 participants has a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), new participants may be entered at the next higher dose level. If 1 of 3 participants has a DLT, up to 3 more participants are to be treated at that same dose level. If 0 of the additional 3 participants at that dose level has a DLT, new participants may be entered at the next higher dose level. If 1 or more of the additional 3 participants experience a DLT, 0 participants are to be started at that dose level and the preceding dose is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). If 2 of 3 of the dosed participants has a DLT on the first dose level, the drug will be administered at a lower dose. If 0 of 3 participants has a DLT at the highest dose level, an additional 3 participants will be enrolled to ensure that 6 participants are treated at the MTD. The MTD is the highest dose level at which no more than 1 of 6 treated participants, experiences a DLT.
Group IV: Dose-escalation Phase (2,000 mg)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
This is a 3 + 3 design. Participants will be entered sequentially. If 0 of 3 participants has a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), new participants may be entered at the next higher dose level. If 1 of 3 participants has a DLT, up to 3 more participants are to be treated at that same dose level. If 0 of the additional 3 participants at that dose level has a DLT, new participants may be entered at the next higher dose level. If 1 or more of the additional 3 participants experience a DLT, 0 participants are to be started at that dose level and the preceding dose is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). If 2 of 3 of the dosed participants has a DLT on the first dose level, the drug will be administered at a lower dose. If 0 of 3 participants has a DLT at the highest dose level, an additional 3 participants will be enrolled to ensure that 6 participants are treated at the MTD. The MTD is the highest dose level at which no more than 1 of 6 treated participants, experiences a DLT.
Group V: Dose-escalation Phase (1,500 mg)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
This is a 3 + 3 design. Participants will be entered sequentially. If 0 of 3 participants has a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), new participants may be entered at the next higher dose level. If 1 of 3 participants has a DLT, up to 3 more participants are to be treated at that same dose level. If 0 of the additional 3 participants at that dose level has a DLT, new participants may be entered at the next higher dose level. If 1 or more of the additional 3 participants experience a DLT, 0 participants are to be started at that dose level and the preceding dose is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). If 2 of 3 of the dosed participants has a DLT on the first dose level, the drug will be administered at a lower dose. If 0 of 3 participants has a DLT at the highest dose level, an additional 3 participants will be enrolled to ensure that 6 participants are treated at the MTD. The MTD is the highest dose level at which no more than 1 of 6 treated participants, experiences a DLT.
Group VI: Dose-escalation Phase (1,000 mg)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
This is a 3 + 3 design. Participants will be entered sequentially. If 0 of 3 participants has a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), new participants may be entered at the next higher dose level. If 1 of 3 participants has a DLT, up to 3 more participants are to be treated at that same dose level. If 0 of the additional 3 participants at that dose level has a DLT, new participants may be entered at the next higher dose level. If 1 or more of the additional 3 participants experience a DLT, 0 participants are to be started at that dose level and the preceding dose is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). If 2 of 3 of the dosed participants has a DLT on the first dose level, the drug will be administered at a lower dose. If 0 of 3 participants has a DLT at the highest dose level, an additional 3 participants will be enrolled to ensure that 6 participants are treated at the MTD. The MTD is the highest dose level at which no more than 1 of 6 treated participants, experiences a DLT.
Gallium maltolate is already approved in United States for the following indications:
🇺🇸 Approved in United States as Gallium maltolate for:
  • Orphan drug designation for pediatric and adult glioblastoma multiforme

Find a clinic near you

Research locations nearbySelect from list below to view details:
Froedtert Hospital & the Medical College of WisconsinMilwaukee, WI
Loading ...

Who is running the clinical trial?

Medical College of WisconsinLead Sponsor

References

Effects of N-6 essential fatty acids on glioma invasion and growth: experimental studies with glioma spheroids in collagen gels. [2013]Intracranial infusions of gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), an essential fatty acid, have been used as an adjuvant therapy following malignant glioma resection; however, little is known about the dose response of glioma cells to this therapy. In this in vitro study the authors address this important pharmacological question.
Role of antioxidant enzyme expression in the selective cytotoxic response of glioma cells to gamma-linolenic acid supplementation. [2019]We hypothesized that the cytotoxic effect of GLA observed in glioma but not normal glial cells reflects differences in GLA metabolism and/or antioxidant enzyme levels between these cells. The PUFA content of unsupplemented glioma cells was approximately 50% of that seen in unsupplemented astrocytes. Supplementation with 20 microM GLA for 24 h led to a 230 and 22% increase in glioma and astrocyte PUFA content, respectively, such that both supplemented cell types contained similar levels of PUFA. No major differences were seen in terms of GLA metabolites retained in the cells or secreted into the media following incubation with [(3)H]-GLA. No significant differences were observed in activity of MnSOD or CuZn-SOD between the cells. However, CAT and GPx activity in the glioma cells was significantly higher and lower, respectively, than observed in normal astrocytes. GLA supplementation resulted in a significant increase in CAT activity in normal astrocytes; glioma CAT activity was unchanged. No significant change was seen in the other antioxidant enzymes following GLA supplementation. These results suggest that the cytotoxic effect of GLA on glioma cells reflects both increased PUFA content and an inability to upregulate CAT.
Increased cure rate of glioblastoma using concurrent therapy with radiotherapy and arsenic trioxide. [2018]Patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) do extremely poorly despite aggressive therapy with surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy. In an effort to increase the efficacy of therapy for GBM, we studied the efficacy of arsenic trioxide (ATO) combined with high-dose RT in GBM cells in vitro and GBM xenograft tumors in nude mice.
Temozolomide and radiotherapy as first-line treatment of high-grade gliomas. [2022]Temozolomide, a novel alkylating agent, has shown promising results in the treatment of patients with high-grade gliomas, when used as single agent as well as in combination with radiation therapy.
A rapid assay for drug sensitivity of glioblastoma stem cells. [2016]Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly infiltrating, aggressive brain cancer with no available curative treatment. We developed a rapid assay for assessing the effect of various drugs on GBM stem cells. The assay uses a small number of separated CD133+ cells (20,000 in 0.2 ml) in 96-well plate that form neurospheres within 1-2 days. Various drugs disperse the neurospheres within 24-36 h, which can be quantified microscopically. We used the GBM cell line A-172 to develop the conditions for the assay, utilizing Gleevec, the gamma-secretase inhibitor DAPT, and the anti-bacterial peptide amph1D. The results show dispersion of the neurospheres leading to cell death, at relatively low drugs concentrations (
Glioblastoma multiforme: emerging treatments and stratification markers beyond new drugs. [2022]Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumour in adults. The standard therapy for GBM is maximal surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). In spite of the extensive treatment, the disease is associated with poor clinical outcome. Further intensification of the standard treatment is limited by the infiltrating growth of the GBM in normal brain areas, the expected neurological toxicities with radiation doses >60 Gy and the dose-limiting toxicities induced by systemic therapy. To improve the outcome of patients with GBM, alternative treatment modalities which add low or no additional toxicities to the standard treatment are needed. Many Phase II trials on new chemotherapeutics or targeted drugs have indicated potential efficacy but failed to improve the overall or progression-free survival in Phase III clinical trials. In this review, we will discuss contemporary issues related to recent technical developments and new metabolic strategies for patients with GBM including MR (spectroscopy) imaging, (amino acid) positron emission tomography (PET), amino acid PET, surgery, radiogenomics, particle therapy, radioimmunotherapy and diets.
Cholera Toxin Subunit B Enabled Multifunctional Glioma-Targeted Drug Delivery. [2018]Glioma is among the most formidable brain cancers due to location in the brain. Cholera toxin subunit B (CTB) is investigated to facilitate multifunctional glioma-targeted drug delivery by targeting the glycosphingolipid GM1 expressed in the blood-brain barrier (BBB), neovasulature, and glioma cells. When modified on the surface of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles (CTB-NPs), CTB fully retains its bioactivity after 24 h incubation in the fresh mouse plasma. The formed protein corona (PC) of CTB-NP and plain PLGA nanoparticles (NP) after incubation in plasma is analyzed using liquid chromatography tandem massspectrometry (nano-LC-MS/MS). CTB modification does not alter the protein components of the formed PC, macrophage phagocytosis, or pharmacokinetic profiles. CTB-NP can efficiently penetrate the in vitro BBB model and target glioma cells and human umbilical vascular endothelial cells. Paclitaxel is loaded in NP (NP/PTX) and CTB-NP (CTB-NP/PTX), and their antiglioma effects are assessed in nude mice bearing intracranial glioma. CTB-NP/PTX can efficiently induce apoptosis of intracranial glioma cells and ablate neovasulature in vivo, resulting in significant prolongation of survival of nude mice bearing intracranial glioma (34 d) in comparison to those treated with NP/PTX (29 d), Taxol (24 d), and saline (21 d). The present study suggests a potential multifunctional glioma-targeted drug delivery system enabled by cholera toxin subunit B.
Multicenter, single arm, phase II trial on the efficacy of ortataxel in recurrent glioblastoma. [2020]Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and frequent subtype of all malignant gliomas. At the time of recurrence, therapeutic options are lacking. Ortataxel, a second-generation taxane was reported to be effective in pre-clinical and phase I clinical studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate a potential therapeutic activity of ortataxel in patients with GBM recurring after surgery and first line treatment.
Phase I trial of dimethyl fumarate, temozolomide, and radiation therapy in glioblastoma. [2022]Dimethyl fumarate (DMF), an oral agent approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), has promising preclinical activity against glioblastoma (GBM). This phase I study sought to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of DMF and evaluate its safety and toxicity when combined with standard concurrent radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) followed by maintenance TMZ in patients with newly diagnosed GBM.
Dose escalation study of targeted alpha therapy with [225Ac]Ac-DOTA-substance P in recurrence glioblastoma - safety and efficacy. [2021]Glioblastoma is the most common and malignant primary brain tumour, with a poor prognosis. Introduction of new treatment options is critically important. The study aimed to assess the appropriateness of escalation doses and toxicity of [225Ac]Ac-DOTA-SP therapy.
Safety of Gliadel Implant for Malignant Glioma: Report of Postmarketing Surveillance in Japan. [2021]Clinical trial data of Carmustine implant (Gliadel Wafer) in Japanese patients with malignant glioma are limited; thus, we conducted a postmarketing surveillance study to evaluate the safety of Gliadel in real-world clinical practice in Japan. In this postmarketing surveillance study, all patients who received Gliadel placement for malignant glioma surgeries from its market launch (January 9, 2013) to July 10, 2013 were enrolled from 229 institutions using a central registration system. Up to eight wafers of Gliadel (containing 61.6 mg of carmustine) were used to cover the site of brain tumor resection intraoperatively according to the size and shape of the tumor resection cavity. The observation period lasted 3 months after Gliadel placement. Patients were followed up for 1 year postoperatively. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In total, 558 patients were included. Most patients (66.7%) received eight Gliadel wafers. The percentage of patients with ADRs was 35.7% (365 ADR episodes in 199 patients). Of the AEs of special interest, the most common were cerebral edema (22.2%, 124/558 patients), convulsion (9.9%, 55/558 patients), impaired healing (4.8%, 27/558 patients), and infection (3.4%, 19/558 patients). This first all-case postmarketing surveillance report of the safety of Gliadel in real-world clinical practice in Japan suggests that the risk of toxicity with Gliadel placement is relatively tolerable. The survival benefits of Gliadel placement should be evaluated and considered carefully by the clinician taking into account possible toxicities.
A natural protein based platform for the delivery of Temozolomide acid to glioma cells. [2022]Glioblastoma is one of the most difficult to treat cancers with poor prognosis and survival of around one year from diagnosis. Effective treatments are desperately needed. This work aims to prepare temozolomide acid (TMZA) loaded albumin nanoparticles, for the first time, to target glioblastoma (GL261) and brain cancer stem cells (BL6). TMZA was loaded into human serum albumin nanoparticles (HSA NPs) using the desolvation method. A response surface 3-level factorial design was used to study the effect of different formulation parameters on the drug loading and particle size of NPs. The optimum conditions were found to be: 4 mg TMZA with 0.05% sodium cholate. This yielded NPs with particle size and drug loading of 111.7 nm and 5.5% respectively. The selected formula was found to have good shelf life and serum stability but with a relatively fast drug release pattern. The optimized NPs showed excellent cellular uptake with ∼ 50 and 100% of cells were positive for NP uptake after 24 h incubation with both GL261 and BL6 glioblastoma cell lines, respectively. The selected formula showed high cytotoxicity with ̴ 20% cell viability at 1 mM TMZA after 72 h incubation time. Finally, the fluorescently labelled NPs showed co-localization with the bioluminescent syngeneic BL6 intra-cranial tumour mouse model after intravenous administration.
Multi-Arm GlioblastoMa Australasia (MAGMA): protocol for a multiarm randomised clinical trial for people affected by glioblastoma. [2023]Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary central nervous system cancer in adults. The objective of the Multi-Arm GlioblastoMa Australasia (MAGMA) trial is to test hypotheses in real world setting to improve survival of people with GBM. Initial experimental arms are evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM). This study will compare maximal surgical resection followed by chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months with the addition of (1) 'neoadjuvant' chemotherapy beginning as soon as possible after surgery and/or (2) adjuvant chemotherapy continued until progression within the same study platform.
Effects of Dimethyl Fumarate on the Karnofsky Performance Status and Serum S100β Level in Newly Glioblastoma Patients: A Randomized, Phase-II, Placebo, Triple Blinded, Controlled Trial: Effect of DMF On the Serum S100β Level and KPS Score of GBM Patients. [2022]Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary central nervous system malignancy with a low survival without extra logistics. Currently, there is no definitive chemotherapy among the studied options. This study aims to evaluate the neuroprotective effects of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) on surgical brain injuries in patients treated for GBM. Materials and Methods: This randomized, phase II, placebo, triple-blinded, controlled trial was performed on 36 patients with a diagnosis of GBM. All the patients received DMF (240 mg, three-times per day) or placebo (with the same shape and administration route) one week before surgery. Also, patients in both groups after the operation received standard treatments (radiotherapy plus chemotherapy). In addition, Kanofsky's performance status (KPS) score was evaluated at baseline and one month later. Also, serum S100β was measured 48 hours before and after surgery. Results: There was no significant difference among DMF and control groups with regard to age, gender, and the extent of resections (P˃0.05). The most adverse event in both groups was a headache. Although the serum S100β level was not markedly changed after surgery, the mean KPS in the DMF group was higher than in the control group after surgery. Conclusion: The DMF could be a possible good regime for the treatment of GBM; however, questions are raised regarding its efficacy and application for the addition to standard treatment.