What is the purpose of this trial?This screening and multi-sub-study Phase 1b/2 trial will establish a method for genomic screening followed by assigning and accruing simultaneously to a multi-study "Master Protocol (BAML-16-001-M1)." The specific subtype of acute myeloid leukemia will determine which sub-study, within this protocol, a participant will be assigned to evaluate investigational therapies or combinations with the ultimate goal of advancing new targeted therapies for approval. The study also includes a marker negative sub-study which will include all screened patients not eligible for any of the biomarker-driven sub-studies.
Will I have to stop taking my current medications?
The trial information does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, it mentions that prior treatment with certain medications is allowed, so it's best to discuss your specific medications with the trial team.
What data supports the effectiveness of the drug Venetoclax in treating acute myeloid leukemia?
Venetoclax, when combined with azacitidine, has shown effectiveness in treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML), particularly in newly diagnosed elderly or unfit patients, with complete remission rates of 28.3% and an improvement in overall survival. It has also demonstrated activity in relapsed/refractory AML, with remission rates of 33-46%, although these remissions are often short-lived.
Venetoclax, when combined with low-dose cytarabine or azacitidine, has shown lower toxicity compared to intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who cannot receive standard treatment. Common side effects include neutropenia (low white blood cell count), thrombocytopenia (low platelet count), and anemia, but these adverse reactions are generally considered tolerable.
What makes the drug combination for acute myeloid leukemia unique?
This treatment combines several targeted therapies, including venetoclax, which is a BCL2 inhibitor, and azacitidine, a hypomethylating agent, to enhance effectiveness against acute myeloid leukemia. The combination is particularly beneficial for older patients or those unfit for intensive chemotherapy, offering a novel approach by targeting specific genetic mutations and pathways involved in the disease.
This trial is for adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Group A includes those who haven't been treated before, except possibly with hydroxyurea. People over 60 or certain younger adults with specific genetic markers can join. Group B is for those whose AML has returned or didn't respond to treatment. You can't join if you have brain involvement by AML, active bleeding disorders, isolated myeloid sarcoma without blood/marrow involvement, a type of leukemia called acute promyelocytic leukemia, or other serious medical conditions.
Inclusion Criteria
I am 60 or older, or I am 18 or older with specific genetic factors.
Subjects must be able to understand and provide written informed consent
My AML has come back or didn't respond to treatment, and I am 18 or older.
+1 more
Exclusion Criteria
I have a blood clotting disorder with active bleeding or signs of clotting.
Patients with psychological, familial, social, or geographic factors that otherwise preclude them from giving informed consent, following the protocol, or potentially hamper compliance with study treatment and follow-up
I have been diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukemia.
+4 more
Trial Timeline
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
1-2 weeks
1 visit (in-person)
Treatment
Participants are assigned to sub-studies based on genomic screening to evaluate investigational therapies or combinations
Up to 12 months
Monthly visits (in-person)
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment
Up to 5 years
Periodic visits (in-person)
Participant Groups
The study tests different treatments based on patients' specific genetic types of AML. It's part of a larger 'Master Protocol' that assigns people to sub-studies testing various drugs and combinations like SNDX-5613, Gilteritinib, Venetoclax and others alongside standard therapies such as Azacitidine and Cytarabine.
16Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: BAML-16-001-S9 (Closed)Experimental Treatment3 Interventions
This is an open-label phase 2 clinical trial of a stepwise approach to the treatment of patients with TP53 mutation AML. On day 1, all enrolled participants will be initiated on therapy with pevonedistat (20 mg/m2) day 1, 3 and 5 together with azacitidine (75 mg/m2 days 1-7 or day 1-5 then day 8, 9) every 28 days. During cycle 1, patients with rapidly progressive disease or severe organ dysfunction, not correctable by hydroxyurea cytoreduction will not be eligible to continue. Those patients who achieved a response, defined as complete response or complete response with incomplete blood count recovery, by the end of cycle 4 will continue on pevonedistat and azacitidine until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or 12 cycles of therapy. After 12 months of combined therapy, pevonedistat will be continued until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or up to 2 years of total therapy.
Group II: BAML-16-001-S8 (Closed)Experimental Treatment6 Interventions
This is an open-label Phase 1b/2 clinical study of gilteritinib monotherapy, gilteritinib in combination with decitabine, or gilteritinib in combination with decitabine and venetoclax in untreated FLT3 mutated AML with high and low variant allele frequency. Initially, the combination of gilteritinib and decitabine was tested (Group 1); however, subsequently the combination of decitabine and venetoclax was shown to be a highly effective therapy for older AML patients, so the triple combination of gilteritinib in combination with decitabine and venetoclax (Group 2) is now being evaluated in this study.
Group III: BAML-16-001-S6 (Closed)Experimental Treatment4 Interventions
The study is an open-label phase 2 study of entospletinib in younger and older AML patients with NPM1+/FLT3ITD-AML. It includes patients age ≥18 years who are able and willing to receive 7 + 3 intensive chemotherapy. Entospletinib is administered daily with IV daunorubicin (days 1-3 for Cycle 1) and cytarabine (days 1-7 for Cycle 1). If a second induction is required, it is given with IV daunorubicin (days 1-2 for Cycle 2) and cytarabine (days 1-5 for Cycle 2).
Group IV: BAML-16-001-S5 (Closed)Experimental Treatment3 Interventions
This is a phase 2 clinical trial to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a stepwise approach to the treatment of patients with TP53 mutations (identified molecularly) with/without complex karyotype (Cohort A) or complex karyotype (3 or greater metaphase abnormalities without TP53) (Cohort B). All enrolled participants will be initiated on entospletinib 400 mg orally twice daily. This dose will be administered continuously in 28 day cycles.
Group V: BAML-16-001-S4 (Closed)Experimental Treatment3 Interventions
This is a 2 cohort phase 1b/2 clinical trial to assess the feasibility and efficacy of entospletinib (ENTO) stepwise approach to the treatment of patients with balanced translocations of MLL identified cytogenetically (Cohort 1) and patients with MLL-partial tandem duplications identified molecularly (Cohort 2). All enrolled participants will be initiated on monotherapy with ENTO 400 mg PO BID. This dose will be administered continuously in 28 day cycles.
Group VI: BAML-16-001-S3 (Closed)Experimental Treatment3 Interventions
This is a phase 2 clinical trial to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a stepwise approach to the treatment of IDH2-mutant AML. On day 1 of the trial, all enrolled participants will be initiated on therapy with the IDH2 inhibitor AG-221 for IDH2 R140 and R172-mutant patients. The dosing will be based on phase 1 experience of AG-221, which has established 100 mg daily as a safe and tolerated dose, with preliminary suggestion of efficacy. These will be administered continuously in 28 day cycles. Hydroxyurea will be allowed for the purposes of cytoreduction.
Group VII: BAML-16-001-S21Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
This is a Phase 1, open-label, multicenter, dose escalation, and dose optimization study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of ZE46-0134 in adult patients with relapsed or refractory AML with FLT3-ITD and/or FLT3-TKD mutations. Patients with AML that are out-patients or hospitalized due to their AML can be enrolled in the study. The study will be run in 2 parts: Part 1 will be dose escalation and determination of the maximum tolerated dose, and Part 2 will be dose expansion.
Group VIII: BAML-16-001-S2 (Closed)Experimental Treatment3 Interventions
This is an open-label Phase 1b/2 clinical study of BI 836858 given in combination with azacitidine, followed by BI 836858 plus azacitidine maintenance, in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. The target population is assigned by the Beat AML Master Protocol (the "umbrella" study). Eligible patients will have previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia, age greater than or equal to 60, with any 1 of the following: mutated TET2, IDH1, IDH2, or WT1, or "marker negative" as defined by the overall Beat AML umbrella protocol.
Group IX: BAML-16-001-S18 (Closed)Experimental Treatment3 Interventions
This is an open-label Phase 1b clinical study of AZD5991 + azacitidine in patients aged ≥60 years with newly diagnosed, previously untreated, hypermethylated and marker-negative AML. The phase 1b1 study will adopt a standard 3+3 design with dose escalation based upon dose limiting toxicities. The recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) is defined in this study as the highest dose level where less than 2 dose limiting toxicities (DLT) are observed out of 6 patients. Once the RP2D is defined, patients will be enrolled into 2 separate cohorts (hypermethylation and marker negative group) for the phase 1b2 expansion. These 2 groups will both be treated at the RP2D determined from phase 1b1.
Group X: BAML-16-001-S17Experimental Treatment4 Interventions
This is an open-label Phase 1b dose escalation and expansion clinical trial to determine the safety and recommended dose of SNDX-5613 combined with azacitidine and venetoclax in newly diagnosed, untreated AML patients age ≥ 60 years who are not candidates or do not wish to pursue intensive induction therapy and who have NPM1 mutated or MLL-rearranged disease. After determination of the recommended dose of SNDX-5613, the study will have an expansion cohort to be treated at the recommended dose in combination with azacitidine and venetoclax in the same patient population.
Group XI: BAML-16-001-S16 (Closed)Experimental Treatment3 Interventions
This is an open-label phase 2 clinical study to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a combination based approach to the treatment of IDH1 mutant AML. On day 1 of the trial, all enrolled participants will be initiated on therapy with the IDH1 inhibitor AG-120 given daily together with azacitidine (days 1-5 and 8-9 or 7 consecutive days 1-7) in 28 day cycles for IDH1 mutant patients. Those patients who have achieved a response, defined as complete response or complete response with incomplete blood count recovery, by the end of cycle 6, will continue on combination therapy for a total of 12 cycles and then patients will go onto receive monotherapy with AG-120 until disease progression or unacceptable side effects that mandate discontinuation of therapy. Patients who cannot complete 12 cycles of azacitidine may proceed onto monotherapy with AG-120.
Group XII: BAML-16-001-S14 (Closed)Experimental Treatment3 Interventions
The study is an open-label Phase 1b/2 clinical study of TP-0903 given in addition to decitabine in patients ≥ 60 years with newly diagnosed, previously untreated AML with TP53 mutations and/or complex karyotype. The Phase 1b portion of this study will use a standard 3 + 3 design with dose escalation based upon dose limiting toxicities. The maximum tolerated dose will be defined as the highest dose where at most 1 patient in 6 experiences dose-limiting toxicity, and this is generally the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Once the RP2D is determined from Phase 1b, patients will be enrolled at this dose level to initiate the Phase 2 portion of the study.
Group XIII: BAML-16-001-S12 (Arm B)Experimental Treatment2 Interventions
This is an open label phase 2 randomized study in which eligible AML patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either the FDA label-approved regimen of 28-day Venetoclax + Azacitidine (Arm A) or the 14-day regimen of Venetoclax + Azacitidine (Arm B). Newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients ≥ 60 years will be enrolled.
Group XIV: BAML-16-001-S10 (Closed)Experimental Treatment3 Interventions
This is a phase 1b/2 clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of AZD5153 and venetoclax. In a phase 1b component, safety and tolerability of the combination will be assessed in relapsed/refractory AML patients ≥ 18 years of age. Following determination of the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), newly diagnosed, marker negative patients age ≥ 60 will be enrolled in the phase 2 component; these patients will be treated at the previously identified RP2D for the combination. The RP2D will be the highest dose level with ≤ 1 out of 6 patients with dose limiting toxicity and defined as the maximum tolerated dose.
Group XV: BAML-16-001-S1 (Closed)Experimental Treatment4 Interventions
This is an open-label Phase 1b/2 clinical study of Samalizumab given in addition to standard induction chemotherapy/consolidation, followed by Samalizumab maintenance, in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Patients that are marker negative, as defined based on the Beat AML Master Protocol assignment or with CBF karyotype/interphase cytogenetics/molecular testing defined by presence of t(8;21)(q22;q22) or the molecular equivalent RUNX1/RUNX1T1 fusion transcript or inv(16)(p13q22) or t(16;16)(p13;q22) or the molecular equivalent CBFB/MYH11 fusion transcript based on the Beat AML will receive Samalizumab in combination with induction therapy followed by Samalizumab maintenance.
Group XVI: BAML-16-001-S12 (Arm A)Active Control2 Interventions
This is an open label phase 2 randomized study in which eligible AML patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either the FDA label-approved regimen of 28-day Venetoclax + Azacitidine (Arm A) or the 14-day regimen of Venetoclax + Azacitidine (Arm B). Newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients ≥ 60 years will be enrolled.
AG-120 is already approved in United States for the following indications:
🇺🇸 Approved in United States as Tibsovo for:
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with a susceptible IDH1 mutation
Find a Clinic Near You
Research Locations NearbySelect from list below to view details:
UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical CenterLos Angeles, CA
UNC Hospitals, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC
Impact of FLT3 Mutation on Outcomes after Venetoclax and Azacitidine for Patients with Treatment-Naïve Acute Myeloid Leukemia. [2023]To evaluate efficacy and safety of venetoclax + azacitidine among treatment-naïve patients with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia.
Novel agents and regimens in acute myeloid leukemia: latest updates from 2022 ASH Annual Meeting. [2023]Developments in investigational agents and novel regimens in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were reported in the 2022 American Society of Hematology (ASH) annual meeting. Encouraging efficacy data were presented from first-in-human studies of two investigational menin inhibitors, SNDX-5613 and KO-539, in relapsed and refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with KMT2A rearrangement or mutant NPM1, with overall response rates (ORR) of 53% (32/60) and 40% (8/20), respectively. The addition of the novel drug pivekimab sunirine, a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate targeting CD123, to azacitidine and venetoclax in R/R AML resulted in an ORR of 45% (41/91), which rose to 53% in those who were venetoclax naïve. Additional novel triplet treatment combinations included the addition of magrolimab, an anti-CD47 antibody, to azacitidine and venetoclax, with an ORR of 81% (35/43) in newly diagnosed AML, including an ORR of 74% (20/27) in TP53 mutated AML. The addition of the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib to azacitidine/venetoclax was also featured, with an ORR of 100% (27/27) in newly diagnosed AML and an ORR of 70% (14/20) in R/R AML.
Azacitidine-venetoclax versus azacitidine salvage treatment for primary induction failure or first relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia patients. [2023]To compare the efficacy of venetoclax-azacitidine (VEN-AZA) with AZA in the real-life for patients with first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (R/R AML).
[Efficacy of Venetoclax Plus Azacitidine in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with FLT3-ITD Mutation]. [2023]Label="OBJECTIVE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To explore the efficacy of venetoclax (VEN) plus azacitidine (AZA) in patients with FLT3-ITD mutated relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (FLT3-ITDmut R/R AML) and analyze the molecular genetic characteristics of the patients.
Venetoclax-based chemotherapy in acute and chronic myeloid neoplasms: literature survey and practice points. [2023]Venetoclax (VEN), a small-molecule inhibitor of B cell leukemia/lymphoma-2, is now FDA approved (November 2018) for use in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), specific to newly diagnosed elderly or unfit patients, in combination with a hypomethylating agent (HMA; including azacitidine or decitabine) or low-dose cytarabine. A recent phase-3 study compared VEN combined with either azacitidine or placebo, in the aforementioned study population; the complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rates were 28.3% and 66.4%, respectively, and an improvement in overall survival was also demonstrated. VEN-based chemotherapy has also shown activity in relapsed/refractory AML (CR/CRi rates of 33-46%), high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (CR 39% in treatment naïve, 5-14% in HMA failure), and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasm (CR 25%); in all instances, an additional fraction of patients met less stringent criteria for overall response. Regardless, venetoclax-induced remissions were often short-lived (less than a year) but long enough to allow some patients transition to allogeneic stem cell transplant. Herein, we review the current literature on the use of VEN-based combination therapy in both acute and chronic myeloid malignancies and also provide an outline of procedures we follow at our institution for drug administration, monitoring of adverse events and dose adjustments.
[Clinical Observation of Venetoclax Combined with Demethylating Agents on the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia]. [2023]To investigate the efficacy and safety of venetoclax (VEN) combined with demethylating agents (HMA) in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML).
[Efficacy of venetoclax combined azacitidine in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia unfit for standard chemotherapy: a single center experience]. [2023]Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of the VA regimen, which combines venetoclax with azacitidine in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not suitable candidates for conventional chemotherapy. Methods: In the Department of Hematology at the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 66 AML patients who received venetoclax and azacitidine treatment from May 2020 to March 2022 were the subject of a retrospective study. The complete remission (CR) rate, cCR rate, ORR rate, MRD negative rate, the incidence of adverse events,1-year EFS, and OS were retrospectively analyzed. Patients subgroups with varying ages, ECOG scores, primary and secondary, risk stratifications, and gene mutation were compared for differences in efficacy and survival. Results: The median follow-up was 4.25 (0.9-19.9) months, and the median number of treatment courses was 2 (1-8) cycles. After the first cycle, the cCR rate was 78.8% , and the MRD negative rate was 51.9% . After prolonged treatment, the cCR rate was 81.8% and MRD negative rate was 66.7% . The median EFS and OS, respectively, were13.2 and 15.3 months. Secondary AML showed inferior efficacy and prognosis. IDH1/2 or NPM1 mutation groups had a significantly higher rate of CR than the control group (P<0.05) . The CR rate and MRD negative rate of patients with rebound thrombocytosis were significantly higher than those without rebound thrombocytosis (P<0.05) . Those who had epigenetic modification mutations (DNMT3, ASXL1, TET2) were more likely to benefit from ongoing therapy. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Conclusions: In real-world patients with newly diagnosed AML who are not candidates for standard chemotherapy, the VA regimen produces rapid deep remission. Primary AML patients, rebound thrombocytosis, IDH1/2, and NPM1 gene mutations are favorable factors for treatment benefit, and adverse reactions were tolerable.
Venetoclax combined with low dose cytarabine compared to standard of care intensive chemotherapy for the treatment of favourable risk adult acute myeloid leukaemia (VICTOR): Study protocol for an international, open-label, multicentre, molecularly-guided randomised, phase II trial. [2022]Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">For patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), the only potentially curative treatment is intensive chemotherapy (IC). This is highly toxic, particularly for patients > 60 years, potentially leading to prolonged hospitalisations requiring intensive supportive care, and sometimes treatment-related death. This also results in extensive healthcare costs and negatively impacts quality of life (QoL). Venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine (VEN + LDAC) is a novel, low-intensity treatment for AML patients who cannot receive IC. VEN + LDAC is given as an outpatient and toxicity appears significantly lower than with IC. Analysis of clinical trials performed to date are promising for patients with the genotype NPM1mutFLT3 ITDneg, where remission and survival rates appear comparable to those achieved with IC.
Venetoclax Synergistically Enhances the Anti-leukemic Activity of Vosaroxin Against Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells Ex Vivo. [2020]The survival rate for acute myeloid leukemia remains unacceptably low, in large part owing to resistance to chemotherapy and high rates of relapse. There is an urgent need to develop new therapeutic modalities, in particular such that are tolerated by patients over the age of 60 years, who form the bulk of new acute myeloid leukemia diagnoses. Vosaroxin (SNS-595), a second-generation topoisomerase II inhibitor and DNA intercalating agent, shows promising preclinical and clinical activity against acute myeloid leukemia. Venetoclax (ABT-199), a selective Bcl-2 inhibitor, was recently approved for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.
Single-agent and combination biologics in acute myeloid leukemia. [2022]Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous malignancy characterized by recurrent genetic, epigenetic, and metabolic abnormalities. As a result of our increasing knowledge of the underlying biology of AML leading to rational drug development, several new targeted agents have been recently added to our therapeutic arsenal. The BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax in combination with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) or hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is safe and effective in older patients with newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Glasdegib, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor, may be used in combination with LDAC for the same indication and improves survival compared with LDAC alone. In newly diagnosed, fit, older patients with therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, the liposome-encapsulated combination of daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351) has shown superiority over the 7 + 3 regimen. The presence of an IDH1 or IDH2 mutation can be effectively targeted by ivosidenib or enasidenib, respectively. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin improves event-free survival in CD33+ patients with favorable or intermediate-risk cytogenetics. With new targeted agents available, comprehensive genomic characterization of AML at diagnosis and relapse is increasingly necessary to select optimal treatment. Herein, we review the new single-agent and combination biologics (omitting FLT3 inhibitors, which are discussed separately) and provide recommendations on how to best use and manage patients on these regimens in clinical practice.