Voyager V1 + Cemiplimab for Melanoma
Recruiting in Palo Alto (17 mi)
+9 other locations
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Travel: May be covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Phase 2
Recruiting
Sponsor: Vyriad, Inc.
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Trial Summary
What is the purpose of this trial?This is a Phase 2 study designed to determine the preliminary anti-tumor activity and confirm the safety of VV1 in combination with cemiplimab. The study will enroll patients with three distinct separate tumor cohorts. The cancers types are colorectal, head and neck carcinoma, and melanoma that are progressing on CPI treatment.
Do I need to stop my current medications to join the trial?
The trial protocol does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, there are specific timeframes for stopping certain therapies before starting the trial: small molecule inhibitors and investigational agents must be stopped 2 weeks or 5 half-lives before, chemotherapy and similar therapies 3 weeks or 5 half-lives before, and radioimmunoconjugates 6 weeks or 5 half-lives before. It's best to discuss your current medications with the trial team.
What data supports the idea that Voyager V1 + Cemiplimab for Melanoma is an effective treatment?
The available research does not provide specific data on the effectiveness of Voyager V1 + Cemiplimab for Melanoma. However, it does mention other treatments for melanoma, such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, which have shown effectiveness in treating advanced melanoma. For example, pembrolizumab combined with another drug showed a response in 34% to 37% of patients. Additionally, prior therapy with pegylated interferon improved the effectiveness of pembrolizumab, reducing recurrence rates and prolonging the time patients remained free of cancer. These findings suggest that combining treatments can enhance effectiveness, which might be relevant when considering Voyager V1 + Cemiplimab.
12345What safety data exists for the Voyager V1 + Cemiplimab treatment for melanoma?
The provided research does not contain specific safety data for Voyager V1 + Cemiplimab or its related names. It focuses on other treatments like pembrolizumab and nivolumab, discussing their safety profiles and adverse events in melanoma patients. For specific safety data on Voyager V1 + Cemiplimab, further research or clinical trial results would be needed.
678910Is the drug Cemiplimab (also known as Voyager V1) a promising treatment for melanoma?
Yes, Cemiplimab, also known as Voyager V1, is a promising drug for treating melanoma. It is part of a new generation of treatments called immune checkpoint inhibitors, which help the body's immune system fight cancer more effectively. These drugs have shown better survival rates and fewer side effects compared to older treatments.
811121314Eligibility Criteria
Adults with certain progressing cancers (oral, head and neck carcinoma, melanoma, colorectal) previously treated with CPI can join. They must have a tumor lesion suitable for injection/biopsy, measurable disease, good performance status (ECOG 0 or 1), over three months life expectancy, and proper organ function. Exclusions include ocular/mucosal/acral melanoma patients; active HBV/HCV/TB infections; serious health risks like uncontrolled hypertension/diabetes; recent use of certain drugs; heart issues; autoimmune diseases except controlled hypothyroidism/type 1 diabetes; immunosuppression conditions.Inclusion Criteria
I have a tumor that can be injected and biopsied, and it hasn't been treated with radiation.
I am fully active or restricted in physically strenuous activity but can do light work.
Exclusion Criteria
I am currently infected with hepatitis B.
I haven't had a severe infection in the last 2 weeks.
I am HIV positive with an active infection.
I am not on high doses of steroids or have a weak immune system.
I have severe heart issues, including arrhythmias or symptomatic coronary artery disease.
I have a history of active or latent tuberculosis.
I have been diagnosed with a specific type of melanoma affecting the eyes, mucous membranes, or extremities.
I am currently infected with Hepatitis C.
I have another type of cancer besides the one being treated.
Participant Groups
The trial is testing the combination of VV1 and Cemiplimab to see how well they work together against specific types of cancer that are not responding to previous treatments. It's in Phase 2 which means it's checking both effectiveness and safety in treating these cancers.
3Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Melanoma intratumoralExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Melanoma, IT VV1 + IV cemiplimab Patients will receive both treatments on Day 1 and every 3 weeks thereafter until lack of clinical benefit or limiting toxicity. VV1 or cemiplimab can continue after the first dose in combination or as a single agent treatment in subsequent doses.
Group II: Head and Neck SCC intratumoralExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
HNSCC, IT VV1 + IV cemiplimab, Patients will receive both treatments on Day 1 and every 3 weeks thereafter until lack of clinical benefit or limiting toxicity. VV1 or cemiplimab can continue after the first dose in combination or as a single agent treatment in subsequent doses.
Group III: Colo-rectal Carcinoma intratumoral (Arm closed)Experimental Treatment2 Interventions
(CLOSED) IT VV1 + IV cemiplimab, Patients will receive both treatments on Day 1 and every 3 weeks thereafter until lack of clinical benefit or limiting toxicity. VV1 or cemiplimab can continue after the first dose in combination or as a single agent treatment in subsequent doses.
Cemiplimab is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada, Brazil for the following indications:
🇪🇺 Approved in European Union as Libtayo for:
- Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC)
- Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
🇺🇸 Approved in United States as Libtayo for:
- Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC)
- Basal cell carcinoma (BCC)
- Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
🇨🇦 Approved in Canada as Libtayo for:
- Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC)
- Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
🇧🇷 Approved in Brazil as Libtayo for:
- Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC)
Find A Clinic Near You
Research locations nearbySelect from list below to view details:
Mayo ClinicRochester, MN
University of Cincinnati Medical CenterCincinnati, OH
Sanford Cancer CenterSioux Falls, SD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew York, NY
More Trial Locations
Loading ...
Who is running the clinical trial?
Vyriad, Inc.Lead Sponsor
Regeneron PharmaceuticalsIndustry Sponsor
References
Successful Treatment of Multiple Metastatic Melanoma with Nivolumab, Ipilimumab plus Denosumab Combined Therapy. [2020]Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined therapy is one of the promising drugs that enhance the anti- immune response in patients with advanced melanoma. Therefore, to increase its response rate is of great interest to dermatologists. Recent reports suggested that, since CD8+ T cells after the administration of ICIs increase the RANKL expression to induce an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in melanoma, denosumab might enhance the anti-tumor effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab and ipilimumab. In this report, we present a case of multiple metastatic melanoma with nivolumab, ipilimumab plus denosumab combined therapy.
Phase Ib/II Study of Pembrolizumab and Pegylated-Interferon Alfa-2b in Advanced Melanoma. [2021]Objective responses are reported in 34% to 37% of patients with programmed death-1 (PD-1)-naïve advanced melanoma treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Pre-existing CD8+ T-cell infiltrate and interferon (IFN) gene signature correlate with response to PD-1 blockade. Here, we report a phase Ib/II study of pembrolizumab/pegylated (PEG)-IFN combination in PD-1-naïve advanced melanoma.
Prior Therapy With Pegylated-Interferon Alfa-2b Improves the Efficacy of Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Resectable Advanced Melanoma. [2021]Combination immunotherapy can overcome the limited objective response rates of PD-1 blockade. Interferon alpha (IFN-α) has been proven to be effective in modulating immune responses and may enhance the clinical responses to PD-1 blockade. According to clinical practice guidelines, IFN-α was recommended as adjuvant therapy for stage IIB/C melanoma patients. However, the impact of prior IFN-α therapy on the efficacy of subsequent PD-1 blockade in melanoma has not been previously reported. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis for melanoma patients and addressed whether prior IFN-α therapy enhanced adjuvant pembrolizumab as later-line treatment. Fifty-six patients with resectable stage III/IV melanoma who received adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Notably, 25 patients received adjuvant pegylated IFN-α (PEG-IFN-α) in the prior line of treatment while 31 patients did not receive prior PEG-IFN-α therapy. Cox regression analysis showed that prior PEG-IFN-α therapy was associated with the efficacy of later-line adjuvant pembrolizumab (hazard ratio=0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.89; P = 0.026). The recurrence rates after treatment with adjuvant pembrolizumab were significantly reduced in the prior PEG-IFN-α group (P < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis also showed that recurrence-free survival (RFS) after adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy was prolonged by prior PEG-IFN-α treatment (median RFSPem 8.5 months vs. 4.5 months; P = 0.0372). These findings indicated that prior PEG-IFN-α could enhance the efficacy of adjuvant pembrolizumab. The long-lasting effects of PEG-IFN-α provide a new rationale for designing combination or sequential immunotherapy.
Efficacy and toxicity of treatment with the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma after prior anti-PD-1 therapy. [2021]Recent phase III clinical trials have established the superiority of the anti-PD-1 antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab over the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced melanoma. Ipilimumab will be considered for second-line treatment after the failure of anti-PD-1 therapy.
Early switch from run-in treatment with vemurafenib plus cobimetinib to atezolizumab after 3 months leads to rapid loss of tumour control in patients with advanced BRAFV600-positive melanoma: The ImmunoCobiVem phase 2 randomised trial. [2023]Label="AIM">ImmunoCobiVem investigated whether a planned switch to atezolizumab after achieving tumour control during run-in with vemurafenib + cobimetinib improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to continuous targeted therapy (TT) in patients with previously untreated advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma.
Real-world experience with pembrolizumab toxicities in advanced melanoma patients: a single-center experience in the UK. [2022]We aimed to characterize the safety profile of pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma patients at our center to better reflect 'real-world' data on anti-PD-1 inhibitors.
Relatlimab and nivolumab in untreated advanced melanoma: insight into RELATIVITY. [2023]With the recent regulatory approvals, the relatlimab-nivolumab combination brings new expectations and opens avenues toward effective immunotherapy combination in advanced melanoma. This work provides a critical insight into the recent phase II-III RELATIVITY-047 trial (NCT03470922), including a comparison with the CheckMate 067 trial on the current standard ipilimumab-nivolumab combination, with a focus on immune-related adverse events. Some imbalances of rare toxicities were noted, deserving careful monitoring and assessment in the upcoming real-world use. The promising efficacy data, although still early, should be carefully balanced against these toxicities, thus making pharmacovigilance and global patient-level data sharing crucial to identify the target population, promote safer prescribing and eventually clarify its place in therapy.
Pembrolizumab in the management of metastatic melanoma. [2020]Pembrolizumab is a humanized IgG4 anti-PD-1 antibody that plays a major role in the treatment of advanced melanoma. Through blockade of PD-1, it leads to an increase in effector T-cell activity in the tumor microenvironment. Clinical trial outcomes for pembrolizumab in addition to pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of the compound are discussed in this article. Phase I trials have demonstrated safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab in advanced, pretreated melanoma patients. When compared with chemotherapy in a Phase II trial of ipilimumab-refractory patients, those treated with pembrolizumab showed superior progression-free survival. In addition, in the pivotal Phase III trial pembrolizumab improved overall survival compared with ipilimumab in patients naive to immune checkpoint inhibition. Pembrolizumab is well tolerated and has a favorable safety profile. Common adverse events are fatigue, rash, itching and diarrhea. Less frequent immune-related adverse events include hypothyroidism, colitis, hepatitis and pneumonitis.
An update on the safety of nivolumab for the treatment of advanced melanoma. [2021]Introduction: Due to its unique mechanism of action as an immune checkpoint inhibitor, nivolumab has high antitumor activity, but at the same time this mechanism is responsible for immune-related adverse events that may limit patients' safety and therapy continuation.Areas covered: Long-term safety of nivolumab including 5-year follow-up, safety of nivolumab treatment after ipilimumab therapy, safety of nivolumab in challenging subgroups (elderly, patients with brain metastases, patients with autoimmune disorders), safety of nivolumab in with rare melanoma subtypes (including mucosal melanoma), as well as specificity of AEs reported for nivolumab treatment in melanoma patients in comparison to other cancer types and other immunotherapy molecules, and impact of AEs on response rates and PFS on nivolumab treatment are discussed.Expert opinion: Search for biomarkers that would help us to identify patient populations that may suffer from severe nivolumab toxicity could help in selecting patients that should not be treated with this type of therapy. Novel combinations and immunotherapy drugs including use of NKTR-214 (IL-2 pathway), lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3), local injections of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), or systemic use of T-cell receptors agonists such as OX40, CD137, ICOS-1, could provide regimens with limited toxicity and higher activity.
Rare immune-related adverse events in patients with melanoma: incidence, spectrum, and clinical presentations. [2023]Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI). While common irAEs have been well characterized, there are more limited data on rare immune related adverse events (RirAEs) due to low incidence. Lack of characterization of these entities has led to difficulties in accurate diagnosis and management. Here, we conducted a multi-institution analysis of all patients with stage III/IV melanoma who developed RirAEs after being treated with ICIs (anti-PD-1/L1, anti-CTLA-4, and combination PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade) at three institutions (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Melanoma Institute of Australia). RirAEs were defined as those occurring in approximately <1% of patients treated with anti-PD-1 or <2% with combination. Of 2834 patients who received ICIs, 82 developed RirAEs and were more common with combination PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade (4.6%) vs. anti-PD-1/L1 agents (2.8%). Overall median time from ICI start to RirAE was 86 days (interquartile range 42-235 days) with significantly earlier onset in combination therapy (p < 0.001). The spectrum of RirAEs spanned across several organ systems. Most RirAEs were grade 2 (57 [41.3%]) and grade 3 (40 [29.0%]) with relatively few grade 4 (11 [8.0%]) or 5 (5 [3.6%]) events. Steroid re-escalation (21.4%) or additional immunosuppression (13.8%) were commonly required. RirAE recurrence occurred in 22.6% with ICI rechallenge; 37.1% had new irAEs with rechallenge. In conclusion, RirAEs associated with ICIs in melanoma patients occurred, in aggregate, in 2-5% of patients treated with anti-PD-1-based therapy. Steroid re-escalation and alternative immunosuppression use were frequently required but fatal irAEs were fairly uncommon.
Pembrolizumab joins the anti-PD-1 armamentarium in the treatment of melanoma. [2017]Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor on T cells and prevents binding to its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. Blocking this receptor frees T cells from the inhibitory effects of PD-L1 and allows them to mediate antitumor effects against cancer cells. In a large Phase I study of 411 patients with melanoma, high durable response rates over a range of doses and schedules have been shown with very little toxicity. A Phase III study of pembrolizumab comparing two schedules of administration with the current standard treatment with the anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody is in progress. Combinations with other checkpoint inhibitors as well as other anticancer agents are also being evaluated. Approval of pembrolizumab for the treatment of melanoma is expected.
Nivolumab (OPDIVOO) BRAF V600 mutation-negative metastatic or inoperable melanoma: survival advantage. [2019]Existing drugs are poorly effective in patients with inoperable or meta- static melanoma without a mutation in the BRAF gene at position V600. The first-line treatment of choice for patients with BRAF V600-positive melanoma is a combination of dabrafenib (a BRAF inhibitor) and trametinib. Nivolumab is a human monoclonal antibody designed to block receptors for PD-1 (programmed cell death-1) and thus to enhance T lymphocyte activity, especially against tumour cells. Nivolumab has been authorised in Europe as monotherapy for patients with inoperable or metastatic melanoma, regardless of BRAFV600 status. Nivolumab has not been compared with the dabrafenib + trametinib combination in patients with BRAF V600-positive melanoma. A randomised double-blind trial ver- sus dacarbazine involved 418 patients with inoperable or metastatic BRAF V600-negative melanoma who had not yet received medication for this stage of the disease.The trial was halted prematurely when an unscheduled analysis showed an improvement in one-year survival with nivolumab compared to dacarbazne(73% versus 42%, p
Very high-dose methylprednisolone for treatment of nivolumab-induced limbic encephalitis: A case report. [2022]Nivolumab is a programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of eight different cancers including metastatic melanoma. Immune checkpoint blockade may lead to a range of neurologic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with severity varying from mild to life-threatening, including encephalitis.
[Not Available]. [2018]ANTI-PD1 ROLE IN TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS MELANOMA: The treatment of metastatic melanoma dramatically changed over the last years. Two therapeutic revolutions emerged in parallel, targeted anti-BRAF and anti-MEK therapies, for patients BRAFV600 mutated and immunotherapy with immune checkpoint blockers using anti-CTLA-4 then anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies. Indeed, melanoma immunotherapy was a golden objective for many years but in spite of important efforts using cytokines (interferon, interleukin) and different vaccine approaches no objective improvement of patients 'prognosis was obtained. Ipilimumab, authorized in 2011, was the first drug which showed a benefit of overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma in spite a low response rate (10-15) and the occurrence of about 25% of serious toxicity. Anti-PD1 appear as a new generation of immune checkpoint blockade with response rates between 30 to 40% of the patients, a proven overall survival benefit as compared with chemotherapy or ipilimumab and less toxicity than ipilimumab. Two molecules, pembrolizumab and nivolumab were recently approved in monotherapy, for metastatic melanoma. Several questions remain unresolved: the respective indications of anti-PD1 and targeted therapies in first line therapy in patients with BRAF mutant melanoma, the benefit of combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy or with targeted therapies, the optimal treatment duration, and the benefit of the anti-PD1 in the adjuvant setting. The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab, recently approved by the FDA but not yet in Europ, shows an improvement of the objective response rates (50-57%) and progression free survival compared with nivolumab but is associated with an higer incidence of serious adverse events (more than 50%).