Your session is about to expire
← Back to Search
Comparative Study of the Sternal Patch System With a Conventional Holter Recorder
N/A
Waitlist Available
Research Sponsored by Children's National Research Institute
Eligibility Criteria Checklist
Specific guidelines that determine who can or cannot participate in a clinical trial Must have
Be younger than 65 years old
Timeline
Screening 3 weeks
Treatment Varies
Follow Up 24 hours
Awards & highlights
No Placebo-Only Group
Summary
This trial will compare the two methods of recording cardiac arrhythmias to see which is more effective.
Eligible Conditions
- Arrhythmia
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Fainting
Timeline
Screening ~ 3 weeks3 visits
Treatment ~ Varies
Follow Up ~ 24 hours
Screening ~ 3 weeks
Treatment ~ Varies
Follow Up ~24 hours
Treatment Details
Study Objectives
Study objectives can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.Primary study objectives
Difference in Cardiac Arrhythmia Detection Between Recording Systems
Difference in Signal Quality Between Recording Systems
Secondary study objectives
Difference in Skin Discomfort Between Recording Systems
Awards & Highlights
No Placebo-Only Group
All patients enrolled in this study will receive some form of active treatment.
Trial Design
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Application of Carnation Ambulatory Patch Monitoring SystemExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
The patient will wear a Standard Holter Monitor and the CAM Patch system simultaneously for 24 hours.
Group II: Application Conventional 24-Hour Holter Monitor RecorderExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
The patient will wear a Standard Holter Monitor and the CAM Patch system simultaneously for 24 hours.
Find a Location
Who is running the clinical trial?
Children's National Research InstituteLead Sponsor
223 Previous Clinical Trials
258,345 Total Patients Enrolled