LDN for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
(LDN-CRPS Trial)
Recruiting in Palo Alto (17 mi)
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Travel: May Be Covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Academic
Recruiting
Sponsor: Stanford University
Must not be taking: Opioid analgesics
Disqualifiers: Allergy to naltrexone, Pregnancy, others
Trial Summary
What is the purpose of this trial?The investigators are testing treatment with low-dose naltrexone (LDN) for symptom relief of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Study participants will be randomly assigned to receive either LDN or placebo for a period of several weeks. During this period participants will be asked to attend either in-person or virtual study visits and complete questionnaires.
Will I have to stop taking my current medications?
The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications, but you must not be using prescription opioids or illegal opioids.
What evidence supports the effectiveness of the drug LDN (Low Dose Naltrexone) for treating Complex Regional Pain Syndrome?
Research on similar drugs suggests that opioid receptor agonists, like those in LDN, can help manage pain by reducing sensitivity to pain and inflammation. Studies on other opioid receptor drugs show they can be effective in treating chronic pain conditions with fewer side effects, which may indicate potential benefits for LDN in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.
12345Is low-dose naltrexone (LDN) safe for use in humans?
Current studies suggest that low-dose naltrexone (LDN) is generally safe for use in humans, with no severe adverse events reported in the majority of studies reviewed. However, more well-designed trials with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm its safety.
678910How does the drug LDN work for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome?
LDN (low-dose naltrexone) is unique for treating Complex Regional Pain Syndrome because it works by reducing inflammation in the nervous system through a specific pathway (Toll-like Receptor 4) and calming overactive immune cells (microglia), which is different from other treatments that often focus on pain relief or physical therapy.
1112131415Eligibility Criteria
This trial is for individuals with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) in an arm or leg, who have been on a stable treatment plan for at least 3 months and have had CRPS for over a year. They must meet specific criteria called the Budapest criteria to participate. People allergic to naltrexone or naloxone, using opioid painkillers or illegal opioids, or who are pregnant or planning pregnancy cannot join.Inclusion Criteria
I have CRPS in my arms and/or legs.
I have been on the same treatment for at least 3 months.
You have been diagnosed with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) according to specific criteria.
+1 more
Exclusion Criteria
I use prescription painkillers or have used illegal opioids.
Current of planned pregnancy
You are allergic to naltrexone or naloxone.
Trial Timeline
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
2-4 weeks
Treatment
Participants receive either low-dose naltrexone or placebo for symptom relief of complex regional pain syndrome
Several weeks
In-person or virtual study visits
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment
4 weeks
Participant Groups
The study is examining if low-dose naltrexone (LDN) can help relieve symptoms of CRPS compared to a placebo. Participants will be randomly chosen to receive either LDN or a placebo and will attend study visits and fill out questionnaires over several weeks.
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Placebo Group
Group I: LDNExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Naltrexone HCL, 4.5 mg, Once a day.
Group II: PlaceboPlacebo Group1 Intervention
Sugar pill
LDN is already approved in United States, European Union for the following indications:
🇺🇸 Approved in United States as Naltrexone for:
- Alcohol dependence
- Opioid dependence
🇪🇺 Approved in European Union as Naltrexone for:
- Alcohol dependence
- Opioid dependence
Find a Clinic Near You
Research Locations NearbySelect from list below to view details:
Stanford UniversityPalo Alto, CA
Loading ...
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
Stanford UniversityLead Sponsor
References
Dopamine D1-like Receptors Regulate Constitutive, μ-Opioid Receptor-Mediated Repression of Use-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity in Dorsal Horn Neurons: More Harm than Good? [2020]The current study reports on a synaptic mechanism through which D1-like receptors (D1LRs) modulate spinal nociception and plasticity by regulating activation of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR).D1LR stimulation with agonist SKF 38393 concentration-dependently depressed C-fiber-evoked potentials in rats receiving spinal nerve ligation (SNL), but not in uninjured rats. Depression was prevented by MOR- but not GABA-receptor blockade. Neurons expressing the D1 subtype were immunopositive for met-enkephalin and vesicular glutamate transporter VGLUT2, but not for GABAergic marker vGAT.Nerve ligation was followed by increased immunoreactivity for D1 in synaptic compartment (P3) in dorsal horn homogenates and presynaptic met-enkephalin-containing boutons. SNL led to increased immunoreactivity for met-enkephalin in dorsal horn homogenates, which was dose-dependently attenuated by selective D1LR antagonist SCH 23390. During blockade of either D1R or MOR, low-frequency (0.2 or 3 Hz) stimulation (LFS) to the sciatic nerve induced long-term potentiation (LTP) of C-fiber-evoked potentials, revealing a constituent role of both receptors in repressing afferent-induced synaptic plasticity. LFS consistently induced NMDA receptor-dependent LTP in nerve-injured rats. The ability of MOR both to prevent LTP and to modulate mechanical and thermal pain thresholds in behavioral tests was preserved in nerve-ligated rats that were postoperatively treated with SCH 23390. D1LR priming for 30 min sufficed to disrupt MOR function in otherwise naive rats via a mechanism involving receptor overuse.The current data support that, whereas D1LR-modulated MOR activation is instrumental in antinociception and endogenous repression of synaptic plasticity, this mechanism deteriorates rapidly by sustained use, generating increased vulnerability to afferent input.
Activation of naloxone-sensitive and -insensitive inhibitory systems in a human pain model. [2013]We investigated naloxone effects in a model of electrically induced pain and hyperalgesia. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, 15 volunteers underwent four 150-minute sessions of high-current-density electrical stimulation of their forearms. After 60 minutes, naloxone or placebo was given intravenously (increasing plasma concentrations of 0.1, 1, and 10 ng/mL; 30 minutes each) in 3 of the 4 sessions. Pain ratings and areas of mechanical hyperalgesia were assessed at regular intervals during all sessions. The low doses of naloxone did not cause any significant change of pain rating of areas of hyperalgesia. In terms of intrasession effects, pain ratings and areas of hyperalgesia significantly decreased during the sessions to 62% (pain rating), 70% (area of punctuate hyperalgesia), and 82% (area of allodynia) of the initial values. Naloxone (10 ng/ml) reversed these decreases. In terms of between-session effects, the time course of pain ratings remained constant from session to session. In contrast, the areas of punctate hyperalgesia successively decreased to 60% of initial value at the fourth repetition. The session effect was not reversed by naloxone. High-current-density electrical stimulation provokes central sensitization, but in addition inhibitory systems are activated that are only partly naloxone-sensitive.
Spinal administration of a delta opioid receptor agonist attenuates hyperalgesia and allodynia in a rat model of neuropathic pain. [2007]Neuropathic (NP) pain is a debilitating chronic pain disorder considered by some to be inherently resistant to therapy with traditional analgesics. Indeed, micro opioid receptor (OR) agonists show reduced therapeutic benefit and their long term use is hindered by the high incidence of adverse effects. However, pharmacological and physiological evidence increasingly suggests a role for deltaOR agonists in modulating NP pain symptoms. In this study, we examined the antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effects of the spinally administered deltaOR agonist, d-[Ala(2), Glu(4)]deltorphin II (deltorphin II), as well as the changes in deltaOR expression, in rats following chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve. Rats with CCI exhibited cold hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia over a 14-day testing period. Intrathecal administration of deltorphin II reversed cold hyperalgesia on day 14 and dose-dependently attenuated mechanical allodynia. The effects of deltorphin II were mediated via activation of the deltaOR as the effect was antagonized by co-treatment with the delta-selective antagonist, naltrindole. Western blotting experiments revealed no changes in deltaOR protein in the dorsal spinal cord following CCI. Taken together, these data demonstrate the antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effectiveness of a spinally administered deltaOR agonist following peripheral nerve injury and support further investigation of deltaORs as potential therapeutic targets in the treatment of NP pain.
A Novel Mu-Delta Opioid Agonist Demonstrates Enhanced Efficacy With Reduced Tolerance and Dependence in Mouse Neuropathic Pain Models. [2021]Numerous studies have demonstrated a physiological interaction between the mu opioid receptor (MOR) and delta opioid receptor (DOR) systems. A few studies have shown that dual MOR-DOR agonists could be beneficial, with reduced tolerance and addiction liability, but are nearly untested in chronic pain models, particularly neuropathic pain. In this study, we tested the MOR-DOR agonist SRI-22141 in mice in the clinically relevant models of HIV Neuropathy and Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN). SRI-22141 was more potent than morphine in the tail flick pain test and had equal or enhanced efficacy versus morphine in both neuropathic pain models, with significantly reduced tolerance. SRI-22141 also produced no jumping behavior during naloxone-precipitated withdrawal in CIPN or naïve mice, suggesting that SRI-22141 produces little to no dependence. SRI-22141 also reduced tumor necrosis factor-α and cyclooxygenase-2 in CIPN in the spinal cord, suggesting an anti-inflammatory mechanism of action. The DOR-selective antagonist naltrindole strongly reduced CIPN efficacy and anti-inflammatory activity in the spinal cord, without affecting tail flick antinociception, suggesting the importance of DOR activity in these models. Overall, these results provide compelling evidence that MOR-DOR agonists could have strong efficacy with reduced side effects and an anti-inflammatory mechanism in the treatment of neuropathic pain. PERSPECTIVE: This study demonstrates that a MOR-DOR dual agonist given chronically in chronic neuropathic pain models has enhanced efficacy with strongly reduced tolerance and dependence, with a further anti-inflammatory effect in the spinal cord. This suggests that MOR-DOR dual agonists could be effective treatments for neuropathic pain with reduced side effects.
Modulation of CNS pain circuitry by intravenous and sublingual doses of buprenorphine. [2013]Buprenorphine (BUP) is a partial agonist at μ-, δ- and ORL1 (opioid receptor-like)/nociceptin receptors and antagonist at the κ-opioid receptor site. BUP is known to have both analgesic as well as antihyperalgesic effects via its central activity, and is used in the treatment of moderate to severe chronic pain conditions. Recently, it was shown that intravenous (IV) administration of 0.2mg/70 kg BUP modulates the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) response to acute noxious stimuli in healthy human subjects. The present study extends these observations by investigating the effects of BUP dose and route of administration on central nervous system (CNS) pain circuitry. Specifically, the modulation of evoked pain BOLD responses and resting state functional connectivity was measured following IV (0.1 and 0.2mg/70 kg) and sublingual (SL) (2mg) BUP administration in healthy human subjects. While 0.1mg/70 kg IV BUP is sub-analgesic, both 0.2mg/70 kg IV BUP and 2.0mg SL BUP are analgesic doses of the drug. Evoked BOLD responses were clearly modulated in a dose-dependent manner. The analgesic doses of BUP by both routes of administration yielded a potentiation in limbic/mesolimbic circuitry and attenuation in sensorimotor/sensory-discriminative circuitry. In addition, robust decreases in functional connectivity between the putamen and the sensorimotor/sensory-discriminative structures were observed at the two analgesic doses subsequent to measuring the maximum plasma BUP concentrations (C(max)). The decreases in functional connectivity within the sensorimotor/sensory-discriminative circuitry were also observed to be dose-dependent in the IV administration cohorts. These reproducible and consistent functional CNS measures at clinically effective doses of BUP demonstrate the potential of evoked pain fMRI and resting-state functional connectivity as objective tools that can inform the process of dose selection. Such methods may be useful during early clinical phase evaluation of potential analgesics in drug development.
Low-dose naltrexone, an opioid-receptor antagonist, is a broad-spectrum analgesic: a retrospective cohort study. [2022]Aim: To evaluate the use of low-dose naltrexone (LDN) as a broad-spectrum analgesic. Methods: Retrospective cohort study from a single pain management practice using data from 2014 to 2020. Thirty-six patients using LDN for ≥2 months were matched to 42 controls. Pain scores were assessed at initial visit and at most recent/final documented visit using a 10-point scale. Results: Cases reported significantly greater pain reduction (-37.8%) than controls (-4.3%; p < 0.001). Whole sample multivariate modeling predicts 33% pain reduction with LDN, with number needed to treat (for 50% pain reduction) of 3.2. Patients with neuropathic pain appeared to benefit even more than those with 'nociceptive'/inflammatory pain. Conclusion: LDN is effective in a variety of chronic pain states, likely mediated by TLR-4 antagonism.
Low-dose naltrexone for the treatment of fibromyalgia: protocol for a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. [2021]Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) is used widely as an off-label treatment for pain despite limited evidence for its effectiveness. A few small trials with a high risk of bias have investigated the effect of LDN on pain associated with fibromyalgia in women, but larger and more methodologically robust studies are needed. The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate if 12 weeks of LDN treatment is superior to placebo in reducing the average pain intensity during the last 7 days in women with fibromyalgia.
The Safety and Efficacy of Low-Dose Naltrexone in Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review. [2023]Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain sensitivity syndrome characterized by diffuse musculoskeletal pain and many other systemic manifestations. Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) has been increasingly used as an off-label treatment option in FM. However, current evidence on the safety and efficacy of LDN in patients with FM is not well known. To systematically assess the current evidence on the safety and efficacy of LDN use in the treatment of FM. A comprehensive bibliographic search was conducted on EBM Reviews - Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EBM Reviews - Cochrane Database of Systematic, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, In-Data-Review & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Daily and Versions and Scopus databases in September 2022. Inclusion criteria were articles that were published in English, focusing on clinical trials involving LDN for the treatment of FM. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted the data. A qualitative analysis was used due to the high methodological heterogeneity between studies. The electronic search produced 805 articles. After applying the inclusion criteria, 9 articles (one RCT, two case reports, two case series, and four pilot trials) were selected for evaluation. LDN intervention protocols, study designs, and follow-up periods were different among the included studies. Overall, LDN was found to be effective in the symptomatic management of FM, and of the 78% of included studies that evaluated for safety, no severe adverse events were reported. Proving the efficacy and safety of low-dose naltrexone is a future possibility based on current study data, but the level of scientific evidence is limited. Future well-designed trials with large sample sizes are required.
A systematic literature review on the clinical efficacy of low dose naltrexone and its effect on putative pathophysiological mechanisms among patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia. [2023]Low dose naltrexone (LDN) is used off-label by many individuals with fibromyalgia to help manage their pain. There is no current systematic literature review summarising the evidence to support this use of LDN. The objectives of this study were to evaluate if patients with fibromyalgia prescribed LDN have reduced pain scores and greater quality of life compared with those allocated to placebo in randomized controlled trials. Secondly to determine if changes in inflammatory markers and brain structure and function are observed among patients with fibromyalgia taking LDN.
A sudden and unprecedented increase in low dose naltrexone (LDN) prescribing in Norway. Patient and prescriber characteristics, and dispense patterns. A drug utilization cohort study. [2022]Following a TV documentary in 2013, there was a tremendous increase in low dose naltrexone (LDN) use in a wide range of unapproved indications in Norway. We aim to describe the extent of this sudden and unprecedented increase in LDN prescribing, to characterize patients and LDN prescribers, and to estimate LDN dose sizes.
Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) using low dose naltrexone (LDN). [2021]Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a neuropathic pain syndrome, which involves glial activation and central sensitization in the central nervous system. Here, we describe positive outcomes of two CRPS patients, after they were treated with low-dose naltrexone (a glial attenuator), in combination with other CRPS therapies. Prominent CRPS symptoms remitted in these two patients, including dystonic spasms and fixed dystonia (respectively), following treatment with low-dose naltrexone (LDN). LDN, which is known to antagonize the Toll-like Receptor 4 pathway and attenuate activated microglia, was utilized in these patients after conventional CRPS pharmacotherapy failed to suppress their recalcitrant CRPS symptoms.
Haunting of the phantom limb pain abolished by buprenorphine/naloxone. [2023]Neuropathic opioid refractory phantom limb pain (PLP) following amputation can be a life long debilitating chronic pain syndrome capable of completely destroying a patient's life. The pain, its associated depression and sleep deprivation can make many patients suicidal. Ever changing and relentless, it is notoriously unresponsive to traditional cocktails of strong opioids, adjuvant pain medications, antidepressants, local anaesthetics, nerve stimulators, hypnotics and psychotropics. Drug effects are seldom more effective than placebo. We describe a successful sustained rescue of a difficult 2-year-long PLP case with sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone using the drug's potent multimodal mechanisms of action: potent long-acting mu agonist/antagonist, kapa receptor antagonist, delta receptor antagonist and novel opioid receptor-like 1 (OR-L1) agonist effects. Traditional escalating pure mu-opioid receptor agonists and adjuvant neuropathic pain cocktails often have disappointing efficacy in the treatment of resistant PLP. We suggest introducing buprenorphine/naloxone as an early effective opioid choice in PLP management.
Complex regional pain syndrome. [2022]Complex regional pain syndrome is a chronic pain condition characterized by autonomic and inflammatory features. It occurs acutely in about 7% of patients who have limb fractures, limb surgery, or other injuries. Many cases resolve within the first year, with a smaller subset progressing to the chronic form. This transition is often paralleled by a change from "warm complex regional pain syndrome," with inflammatory characteristics dominant, to "cold complex regional pain syndrome" in which autonomic features dominate. Multiple peripheral and central mechanisms seem to be involved, the relative contributions of which may differ between individuals and over time. Possible contributors include peripheral and central sensitization, autonomic changes and sympatho-afferent coupling, inflammatory and immune alterations, brain changes, and genetic and psychological factors. The syndrome is diagnosed purely on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms. Effective management of the chronic form of the syndrome is often challenging. Few high quality randomized controlled trials are available to support the efficacy of the most commonly used interventions. Reviews of available randomized trials suggest that physical and occupational therapy (including graded motor imagery and mirror therapy), bisphosphonates, calcitonin, subanesthetic intravenous ketamine, free radical scavengers, oral corticosteroids, and spinal cord stimulation may be effective treatments. Multidisciplinary clinical care, which centers around functionally focused therapies is recommended. Other interventions are used to facilitate engagement in functional therapies and to improve quality of life.
Outpatient intravenous ketamine for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: a double-blind placebo controlled study. [2022]Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a severe chronic pain condition that most often develops following trauma. The pathophysiology of CRPS is not known but both clinical and experimental evidence demonstrate the important of the NMDA receptor and glial activation in its induction and maintenance. Ketamine is the most potent clinically available safe NMDA antagonist that has a well established role in the treatment of acute and chronic pain. This randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous ketamine in the treatment of CRPS. Before treatment, after informed consent was obtained, each subject was randomized into a ketamine or a placebo infusion group. Study subjects were evaluated for at least 2 weeks prior to treatment and for 3 months following treatment. All subjects were infused intravenously with normal saline with or without ketamine for 4h (25ml/h) daily for 10 days. The maximum ketamine infusion rate was 0.35mg/kg/h, not to exceed 25mg/h over a 4h period. Subjects in both the ketamine and placebo groups were administered clonidine and versed. This study showed that intravenous ketamine administered in an outpatient setting resulted in statistically significant (p
Visual illusions modulate body perception disturbance and pain in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A randomized trial. [2021]Effective treatment of longstanding Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a challenge, as causal mechanisms remain elusive. People with CRPS frequently report distorted subjective perceptions of their affected limb. Evidence of pain reduction when the affected limb is visually altered in size suggests that visual illusions used to target central processing could restore coherence of this disrupted limb representation. We hypothesized that using virtual reality that alters hand image to match the patient's desired hand appearance would improve body perception disturbance and pain. Also, repeated exposure would maintain any therapeutic effect.